RE: [patch] for Bug 16864

2003-02-09 Thread Adrian Sutton
pClient Project Subject: Re: [patch] for Bug 16864 I guess no comments are good comments ;-) I'll check in the patch. Jeffrey Dever wrote: > I was too hot on the send button. This'll help ;-) > > I have tests that I'm just committing now ... > > Adrian Sutton wro

Re: [patch] for Bug 16864

2003-02-07 Thread Jeffrey Dever
Thanks for the quick response, I'm sure the user will appreciate it greatly! :) Adrian Sutton, Software Engineer Ephox Corporation www.ephox.com -Original Message- From: Jeffrey Dever [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 7 February 2003 2:33 PM To: Commons HttpClient Project Subj

Re: [patch] for Bug 16864

2003-02-06 Thread Jeffrey Dever
utton, Software Engineer Ephox Corporation www.ephox.com -Original Message- From: Jeffrey Dever [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 7 February 2003 2:33 PM To: Commons HttpClient Project Subject: [patch] for Bug 16864 I created some tests for this issue and checked them in. Attache

RE: [patch] for Bug 16864

2003-02-06 Thread Adrian Sutton
Sent: Friday, 7 February 2003 2:33 PM To: Commons HttpClient Project Subject: [patch] for Bug 16864 I created some tests for this issue and checked them in. Attached is a patch to fix the issue and make the tests pass, but it needs to be reviewed. I changed slightly the semantics of one very impo

[patch] for Bug 16864

2003-02-06 Thread Jeffrey Dever
I created some tests for this issue and checked them in. Attached is a patch to fix the issue and make the tests pass, but it needs to be reviewed. I changed slightly the semantics of one very important method: HttpConnection.readLine(). It now requires the a "\r\n" be present as a pair to t