RE: refresh header proxy

2004-01-12 Thread Tim Reilly
Not to beat a dead horse... but I was surprised this is a non-standard header so for anyone interested here are my "of interest" links. As Odi mentions Netscape introduced the header (the meta tag is the html equivalent to the (non-standard) http header.) Early draft refers to the Refresh header b

Re: refresh header proxy

2004-01-12 Thread Ortwin Glück
Roland Weber wrote: It is common (maybe even standard?) behaviour for browsers to interpret this meta tag, which does not mean they interpret the corresponding HTTP header. Roland, it may interest you that http-equiv meta parameters are actually meant to be treated as if they were sent as HTTP

RE: refresh header proxy

2004-01-12 Thread David Rosenstark
nd IE -Original Message- From: Roland Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon, January 12, 2004 5:18 PM To: Commons HttpClient Project Subject: RE: refresh header proxy Hello David, are you sure the browsers are handling the HTTP header field and not the contents of the HTML document ret

RE: refresh header proxy

2004-01-12 Thread Roland Weber
AIL PROTECTED]> 12.01.2004 15:16 Please respond to "Commons HttpClient Project" To: "Commons HttpClient Project" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject:RE: refresh header proxy ok, good point. I tried out just resending the requests twice and

RE: refresh header proxy

2004-01-12 Thread David Rosenstark
ok, thanks. I will try to give it a try and let you know if it helps. -Original Message- From: Kalnichevski, Oleg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon, January 12, 2004 4:37 PM To: Commons HttpClient Project Subject: RE: refresh header proxy All right. After having examined the wirelog

RE: refresh header proxy

2004-01-12 Thread Kalnichevski, Oleg
that makes any difference Cheers Oleg -Original Message- From: David Rosenstark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 15:17 To: Commons HttpClient Project Subject: RE: refresh header proxy ok, good point. I tried out just resending the requests twice and it did

Re: refresh header proxy

2004-01-12 Thread Mike Moran
Kalnichevski, Oleg wrote: I think all you need to know is what the header looks like, as i did look at the logs. It simply ignores the header. The header looks like this: Refresh: 0; URL=https:// Well, things _may_ be a little bit more complicated than that. [ ... ] I had to do some par

RE: refresh header proxy

2004-01-12 Thread David Rosenstark
: Commons HttpClient Project Subject: RE: refresh header proxy > I think all you need to know is what the header looks like, as i did look at > the logs. It simply ignores the header. The header looks like this: > > Refresh: 0; URL=https:// Well, things _may_ be a little bit more

RE: refresh header proxy

2004-01-12 Thread Kalnichevski, Oleg
January 12, 2004 2:51 PM To: Commons HttpClient Project Subject: RE: refresh header proxy David, No, it is not. However, as we are currently in the process of reengineering authentication/proxy code, if you provide the wirelog/debug of the HTTP session in question, we might be able to add such feat

Re: refresh header proxy

2004-01-12 Thread Ortwin Glück
Kalnichevski, Oleg wrote: There is not anything like a refresh header in HTTP. You probably mean Odi, that quite well may be, but to my best knowledge certain widely used proxy headers are not really defined by any RFCs. There are just common practices that most of the leading proxy servers a

RE: refresh header proxy

2004-01-12 Thread David Rosenstark
wire - << "Refresh: 0; URL=https://reports..com/users//file.csv[\r][\n]"; 2004-01-12 15:21:14,406 [main] DEBUG httpclient.wire - << "Connection: Close[\r][\n]" -Original Message- From: Kalnichevski, Oleg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon, January 12,

RE: refresh header proxy

2004-01-12 Thread David Rosenstark
" and request the page. Do you need more info than this? -Original Message- From: Kalnichevski, Oleg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon, January 12, 2004 2:51 PM To: Commons HttpClient Project Subject: RE: refresh header proxy David, No, it is not. However, as we are currently in t

RE: refresh header proxy

2004-01-12 Thread Kalnichevski, Oleg
> There is not anything like a refresh header in HTTP. You probably mean Odi, that quite well may be, but to my best knowledge certain widely used proxy headers are not really defined by any RFCs. There are just common practices that most of the leading proxy servers adhere to (to an extent) li

Re: refresh header proxy

2004-01-12 Thread Ortwin Glück
David Rosenstark wrote: Is the refresh header supposed to be supported by httpclient (latest version)? There is not anything like a refresh header in HTTP. You probably mean the refresh feature of HTML. HTML is transported by HTTP as the message body. HttpClient does not try to interprete the

RE: refresh header proxy

2004-01-12 Thread Kalnichevski, Oleg
David, No, it is not. However, as we are currently in the process of reengineering authentication/proxy code, if you provide the wirelog/debug of the HTTP session in question, we might be able to add such feature to the development branch of HttpClient in the forthcoming weeks For details on l