On 29 October 2010 02:11, Neil Kandalgaonkar ne...@wikimedia.org wrote:
The debate I see on Commons and elsewhere focuses on trying to fix
Categories, but frankly IMO it would be better to migrate them to some
other systems entirely.
:Let me precis several years' wishlisting on the topic:
*
Hoi,
Yes, tags can be translated too.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 29 October 2010 09:32, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 October 2010 02:11, Neil Kandalgaonkar ne...@wikimedia.org wrote:
The debate I see on Commons and elsewhere focuses on trying to fix
Categories, but frankly IMO
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 8:32 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 October 2010 02:11, Neil Kandalgaonkar ne...@wikimedia.org wrote:
The debate I see on Commons and elsewhere focuses on trying to fix
Categories, but frankly IMO it would be better to migrate them to some
other
Op 29 okt 2010, om 10:13 heeft Magnus Manske het volgende geschreven:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 8:32 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 29 October 2010 02:11, Neil Kandalgaonkar ne...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
The debate I see on Commons and elsewhere focuses on trying to fix
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Krinkle krinklem...@gmail.com wrote:
For one, tags would not be hierarchical and not stored under a name,
rather a number (an id if you will).
I would store the tag-i18n definitions in a separate Tag: namespace.
Then you don't need to create the history tracking
Op 29 okt 2010, om 14:51 heeft Magnus Manske het volgende geschreven:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Bryan Tong Minh
bryan.tongm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Krinkle krinklem...@gmail.com
wrote:
For one, tags would not be hierarchical and not stored under a name,
Op 29 okt 2010, om 15:01 heeft Bryan Tong Minh het volgende geschreven:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Magnus Manske
magnusman...@googlemail.com wrote:
Multilanguage tags, as well as synonyms, could simply be implemented
as #REDIRECTs, maybe. [[Tag:Blume]] would redirect to [[Tag:Flower]],
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Krinkle krinklem...@gmail.com wrote:
Op 29 okt 2010, om 14:51 heeft Magnus Manske het volgende geschreven:
Multilanguage tags, as well as synonyms, could simply be implemented
as #REDIRECTs, maybe. [[Tag:Blume]] would redirect to [[Tag:Flower]],
so a search
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Krinkle krinklem...@gmail.com wrote:
So [[Tag:Blume]] would never appear in wiki-text. Instead
[[Tag:Flower]] or [[Tag:100]] (depending
on the sytem we decide to use). And in sidebar (and whereever else
tag_i18n is consulted) the currect language
appears.
Op 29 okt 2010, om 15:10 heeft Magnus Manske het volgende geschreven:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Krinkle krinklem...@gmail.com
wrote:
Op 29 okt 2010, om 14:51 heeft Magnus Manske het volgende geschreven:
Multilanguage tags, as well as synonyms, could simply be implemented
as
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Magnus Manske
magnusman...@googlemail.com wrote:
Another idea: Instead of inventing new syntax or pseudo-HTML tags, why
not use language links? On [[Tag:Flower]]
[[en:Flower]]
[[de:Blume]]
Because you want to avoid using a single syntax for multiple purposes
Op 29 okt 2010, om 15:13 heeft Magnus Manske het volgende geschreven:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Krinkle krinklem...@gmail.com
wrote:
So [[Tag:Blume]] would never appear in wiki-text. Instead
[[Tag:Flower]] or [[Tag:100]] (depending
on the sytem we decide to use). And in sidebar (and
Hoi,
Typically I am happy with hacks but this is an exception. The terminology
used in the categories are not optimal. The use of plural, the use of latin
names for organisms.. It is better for people to add new tags because
otherwise they think it has to be like that.
Thank,
GerardM
On 29
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Gerard Meijssen
gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi,
Typically I am happy with hacks but this is an exception. The terminology
used in the categories are not optimal. The use of plural, the use of latin
names for organisms.. It is better for people to add new
Today I attended yet another workshop where a brave
volunteer tried to explain the usefulness of
Wikimedia Commons to teachers/scientists. During
the following exercise, a very computer literate
senior geneticist tried to access wikimedia.org
and landed on the Wikimedia Foundation website.
After
On 28 October 2010 21:21, Lars Aronsson l...@aronsson.se wrote:
Now, the second part. Finding pictures in Commons
is really hard. It seems that categories and textual
descriptions are added by the uploader, and rarely
modified or enhanced by others. Finding a map of bird
migration paths
Galleries need to be encouraged to higher degree, these galleries work well
as a guide but also as a way for potential contributors to identify areas
where theres a short fall in available media.
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Banksia --- which then links to the
species categories directly
oops wrong button hit when new message appeared [?]
On 29 October 2010 13:18, Gnangarra gnanga...@gmail.com wrote:
Galleries need to be encouraged to higher degree, these galleries work well
as a guide but also as a way for potential contributors to identify areas
where theres a short fall in
18 matches
Mail list logo
