Hi Daniel,
Op 26-6-2013 20:37, Daniel Kinzler schreef:
Am 25.06.2013 22:16, schrieb Maarten Dammers:
I think that the technology of Wikidata would be very useful for this, but that
the meta data should be maintained on Commons itself.
Why?
Because it makes sense that the meta-info is stored
On 28 June 2013 18:16, Maarten Dammers maar...@mdammers.nl wrote:
In the long run we should probably get rid of the categories.
Heh, that sounds like a proposal custom-designed to get bogged down in
process. Best to let them fade away :-)
- d.
___
Am 28.06.2013 19:16, schrieb Maarten Dammers:
Commons should be the interface to maintain the data. The actual data can be
stored in a different location.
yes, but it makes things easier to keep the meta data local to the primary data.
think of dumps, etc. i see no good reason to *not* have
Am 25.06.2013 22:16, schrieb Maarten Dammers:
I think that the technology of Wikidata would be very useful for this, but
that
the meta data should be maintained on Commons itself.
Why?
Because it makes sense that the meta-info is stored in the same place as and
maintained by the same people
Over the last year, we have seen some discussion about if and how Wikidata can
be useful for Wikimedia Commons. One aspect of this is maintaining meta data as
structured data.
I think that the technology of Wikidata would be very useful for this, but that
the meta data should be maintained on
Thank you for the information. Would it be possible to use Wikidata instead
of subject categories? I mean the biggest problem to get more participant
is category name on Commons are in English.
Regards,
Juandev
2013/6/25 Daniel Kinzler dan...@brightbyte.de
Over the last year, we have seen
On 25 June 2013 15:58, Juan de Vojníkov juandevojni...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/6/25 Daniel Kinzler dan...@brightbyte.de
Over the last year, we have seen some discussion about if and how Wikidata
can
be useful for Wikimedia Commons. One aspect of this is maintaining meta
data as
structured
Hoi,
Why not have tags (that are in effect references to Wikidata) they would in
effect be searchable in any language.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 25 June 2013 17:04, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 June 2013 15:58, Juan de Vojníkov juandevojni...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/6/25 Daniel
Am 25.06.2013 17:19, schrieb Gerard Meijssen:
Hoi,
Why not have tags (that are in effect references to Wikidata) they would in
effect be searchable in any language.
Even though that is not explicitly stated, the proposal already covers that. Add
properties like depicts or topic to allow for
toolspam
Complex queries on wikidata are possible to find what you want, albeit not
with wikidata itself (yet). Meanwhile:
Visual query builder : http://208.80.153.172/wdq/
API : http://208.80.153.172/api_documentation.html
/toolspam
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Otourly Wiki
Hi Daniel,
I like to focus on one thing: Where to store it.
Op 25-6-2013 14:30, Daniel Kinzler schreef:
Over the last year, we have seen some discussion about if and how Wikidata can
be useful for Wikimedia Commons. One aspect of this is maintaining meta data as
structured data.
I think that
11 matches
Mail list logo
