> i said that, and i was at least partly wrong. see the attached
> message from roy.
Translation: I did the right thing for ASL v1.1, but only for policy
reasons?
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fo
Ah,
So if I'm right Roy's point is that if the current ASFL is not applicable by
reference then the copyright in the refrence is the only relevant statement. It
reserves all rights to the copyright holder (ASF), so code released like this
may be argued to be not Open Source, and that only the A
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Rich,
>
>> What is the rationale for the full text in each and every file?
>
> ASF Board directive, as it was told to me. I wasn't privy to the decision
> making process, but I assume that a determination was made that:
>
> /* Copyright (C) The Apache Software Foundati
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I think in general ./ or ./index.html should return a human readable
form and ./index.xml should give machine readable form of the following
Or use the Accept-type: as a selector.
Could you clarify your thoughts? I assume that you are refering to the
Accept: header as de
Rich,
> What is the rationale for the full text in each and every file?
ASF Board directive, as it was told to me. I wasn't privy to the decision
making process, but I assume that a determination was made that:
/* Copyright (C) The Apache Software Foundation. All rights reserved.
*
* This
> > I think in general ./ or ./index.html should return a human readable
> > form and ./index.xml should give machine readable form of the following
> Or use the Accept-type: as a selector.
Could you clarify your thoughts? I assume that you are refering to the
Accept: header as defined by RFC
As far as I understand it, the license itself isn't compatible to be
referenced from another file. It's quite 'direct' and always relates to
the document it is in. IANAL but I think we would need another phrase in
the license wich states something like the following:
"This license applies to an
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Just in case it would be of help to any other project(s), here is a link to
> a message I posted earlier tonight to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The message mentions
> the
> automated process by which I updated every Java file in James to have the
> full ASF Li
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > >Guys, does this have much to do with 'community' anymore? From what
> > >I've read, it looks like a Java specific project.
For the record - this is something which affects *all* committers and the
whole apache community - so community@ seems as g
> I think in general ./ or ./index.html should return a human readable
> form and ./index.xml should give machine readable form of the following
Or use the Accept-type: as a selector.
Dw.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL P
> Guys, does this have much to do with 'community' anymore? From what
> I've read, it looks like a Java specific project.
Actually - if done well - it could also be used to resolve APR
dependencies; or even (auth) module dependencies. I.e. be able
to do
./configure --with-module=mod_aut
> I'm in a "just do it" kind of mood.
+1
Dw
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dion,
can you please use the newly created [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list (thanks,
Sam) for this sort of topics?
Thanks and cheers,
Erik
Sam Ruby wrote:
I'm in a "just do it" kind of mood.
I just created a [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. Noel is the initial moderator.
If/when there is an infrastr
Nick Chalko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/03/2003 05:56:32 AM:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Nick,
> >
> > can you explain why there is a need for a subproject and not a
> > sub-subproject etc?
>
> Good question.
>
> This also releates to "what is a project" . Jakarta , avalon, turbin
"Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/03/2003 05:36:38
AM:
[snip]
> I've gotten bit by the opposite problem (changing version number in a
JAR
> filename causing broken build scripts) just as often.
>
> Wouldn't a reasonable approach to this problem be to make searches for
> "com
Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/03/2003 03:12:55 AM:
> On Sat, 1 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Having a file encode --.type has been
> very useful for us.
> >
> > Yes, it's often different from what the project creates and
> distributes, but I (and others)
> > have
"Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/03/2003 06:45:42 AM:
[snip]
> How much should be encoded in a URI, and how much in data associated
with
> the URI? You seem to be trying to encode all of the data into the URI
> naming space. Why not have a single URI for the target, and then
t
Hey Costin, tell me if I'm reading this right:
Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/03/2003 05:59:56 AM:
> On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
> > > Collaboration does happen, now. It's not a future waiting to
happen.
> > > Is there something that's not happening that spe
Nick Chalko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/03/2003 05:09:50 AM:
> A somewhat standard layout is the important part.
>
> If we are changing current practice I think
>
> project/[subproject]/version/(jar|zip|gz|docs|liscenses)
> is very good.
Sub project is, IMHO, way too fragile to be part of
> Craig R McClanahan writes:
> Wouldn't a reasonable approach to this problem be to make searches
> for "commons-foo.jar" return the latest released version, while
> searches for "commons-foo-x.y.jar" would return that particular
> version? Then, you can have it either way. On the former, one
Costin Manolache wrote:
On 1 Mar 2003, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 11:12, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is also redundant information - each jar has a well-defined Manifest
that should include version.
But I agree - re
Thansk Sam.
Sam Ruby wrote:
I'm in a "just do it" kind of mood.
I just created a [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. Noel is the
initial moderator.
If/when there is an infrastructure.apache.org set up, I'll move the
list to there. (currently it is [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
If there is significant disse
Yes. Stable URIs are a must.
Hence the subproject piece of the directory structure was left out of
the maven repository and we went with only.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog
Work: http://www.multitask.com.au
-"Noel J.
On 1 Mar 2003, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 11:12, Costin Manolache wrote:
> > On Sat, 1 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > It is also redundant information - each jar has a well-defined Manifest
> > that should include version.
> >
>
> Unfortunately practice and obs
24 matches
Mail list logo
