On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 23:10:39 +0200
(Subject: Re: The board is not responsible!)
Santiago Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Should there perhaps be such a PMC, or a PMC responsible for all
> > mailing lists not managed by any other PMCs?
> Who manages those managers that don't manage themselves?
Steven Noels wrote:
> Santiago Gala wrote:
>>> Just tell them. I think they are all PMC Chairs are subscribed to
>>> board, so it should be easy to tell them there to
>
> Sideway comment from my little peanut gallery: this is (only) the second
> time I overheard that PMC chairs can subscribe t
Santiago Gala wrote:
When I said:
Just tell them. I think they are all PMC Chairs are subscribed to
board, so it should be easy to tell them there to
Sideway comment from my little peanut gallery: this is (only) the second
time I overheard that PMC chairs can subscribe to board@ - in three
year
El miércoles, 22 octu, 2003, a las 15:31 Europe/Madrid, Magnus ?or
Torfason escribió:
Should there perhaps be such a PMC, or a PMC responsible for all
mailing lists not managed by any other PMCs?
Who manages those managers that don't manage themselves?
XXIst century version of the Barber's parado
El miércoles, 22 octu, 2003, a las 06:18 Europe/Madrid, Phil Steitz
escribió:
Maybe I am way off base here, but I see the whole community as
responsible. The Board and PMCs (relatively stable "authorities") have
to exist for legal reasons and to make program-level decisions
(including how
El martes, 21 octu, 2003, a las 07:03 Europe/Madrid, Craig R.
McClanahan escribió:
One of the hardest things for many newcomers to Apache (or other open
source cultures that operate similarly) is the brusque-sounding tone
of many comments. It's not personal -- it's based on a (shared) goal
to
Hi,
just FYI: the European Commission has published a guide
discussing OSS including information about migration from
proprietary software to OSS, e.g., it includes a chapter
on how to migrate from ISS to the Apache httpd.
Further, it mentions Apache James.
http://europa.eu.int/ISPO/ida/jsps/inde
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > 1. website (www.apache.org/ "site" module) maintenance
> > and improvements/suggestions of userfriendliness of each $tlp sites.
>
> I believe the website needs to be ultimately controlled by the infrastructure
> committee. We used to have a separ
I don't want to be an "enthusiasm blocker" but I have to agree with
what Justin already said. Tetsuya, do you think that the suggested
split-ups are reducing the amount of bureaucracy we already have in
ASF-land? If so, can you please be so kind and elaborate further on
this?
I'd be fine with
--On Thursday, October 23, 2003 11:44 AM +0900 Tetsuya Kitahata
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
?? ... press@ can't be found at http://www.apache.org/mail/
neither eyebrowse.
Where can i find the archive (log), by the way?
press@ is not a public list. It is the place where PR firms can (and do)
cont
--On Wednesday, October 22, 2003 12:37 PM -0400 "Noel J. Bergman"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As for internationalization, I don't see why it should not be part of Apache
Commons. I think that it is exactly the correct place for it. I don't know
that it needs a CVS module, but I'm not opposed to
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 09:32:49 -0700 (PDT)
(Subject: Press PR (was Re: The board is not responsible!))
Dirk-Willem van Gulik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 'Public Relations Committee' ... Sounds reasonable.
> We've long had the press@ mailing list. We could inflate this in a
> slightly bigger PR
Title: email
LATEST BREAKTHROUGH - NEWS FLASH
The BAD News: As you Age your body produces less hormones causing you to look older, feel older and be weaker!
The GOOD News: Experts in the New England Journal of Medicine, report that Human Growth Hormone therapy makes you look and
13 matches
Mail list logo
