Brian Behlendorf wrote:
We don't appear to, but I would be +1 on setting something like this up.
Freebsd.org has one, not sure who else might.
Setting it up is one thing, but maintaining it
and keeping oversight on fake entries, removing
old stuff, is the hard part.
By the way, a while ago i
David Crossley wrote:
Brian Behlendorf wrote:
We don't appear to, but I would be +1 on setting something like this up.
Freebsd.org has one, not sure who else might.
Setting it up is one thing, but maintaining it
and keeping oversight on fake entries, removing
old stuff, is the hard part.
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Setting it up is one thing, but maintaining it
and keeping oversight on fake entries, removing
old stuff, is the hard part.
Couldn't it be delegated down to PMCs and its CVS/SVN repo and the
'system' aggregates or links the content centrally.
On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 19:57, David Crossley wrote:
Brian Behlendorf wrote:
We don't appear to, but I would be +1 on setting something like this up.
Freebsd.org has one, not sure who else might.
Setting it up is one thing, but maintaining it
and keeping oversight on fake entries, removing
David Crossley wrote:
Would that make the PMCs responsible if something went haywire?
If so, yikes.
Even so, i cannot see that as sustainable. How would the PMCs
find the energy to verify that jobs were legitimate?
Why can't the PMC be responsible if the committers are the one the
place the stuff
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Would that make the PMCs responsible if something went haywire?
If so, yikes.
Even so, i cannot see that as sustainable. How would the PMCs
find the energy to verify that jobs were legitimate?
Why can't the PMC be responsible if the
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Martin Cooper wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Why can't the PMC be responsible if the committers are the one the place the
stuff (I see that all 'content' goes into CVS/SVN).
Perhaps some PMC members are happy to spend their time verifying job
As I understand this, OASIS wants to grant Apache members (i.e.
committers), the ability to join OASIS committees as if Apache were a
member company. This would be really handy for ASF committers who are
either independent or work for a company that does not belong to OASIS.
This is a good
Hello,
Could you (someone who *can* access to Hermes.Apache.Org -- CLOSED
server in OPEN SOURCE community -- or minotaur.apache) please
change that 552 error message from
Message rejected as it is spam
to
Message rejected as it is spam or perhaps it is written in
non-latin-language
?
We
Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
Could you (someone who *can* access to Hermes.Apache.Org -- CLOSED
server in OPEN SOURCE community -- or minotaur.apache)
Yes, we should telnet instead of ssh. And publish that pesky root password.
That would open up the source.
please change that 552 error message
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 16:50:53 -0400
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
As for the problem, it seems to be in spamwatch, and will be addressed.
--- Noel
Aye. Thanks a ton. By the way, can I suggest it that --
if your team (infrastructure team) would have conducted
*critical* infrastructural affairs,
11 matches
Mail list logo
