Do we have any more time/date thoughts on this? I know Mr. Dynomite
and would love to invite him over.
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 11:48 +0200, Jukka Zitting wrote
I was thinking of potential cross-project meetup plans for the
CCHits ( http://cchits.ning.com/ ) is designed to be a digg like
thing for creative commons licensed music. Might be helpful.
-Brian
On Jun 2, 2006, at 7:41 AM, david reid wrote:
Some of you may have noticed that Rich and I finally got our act
together and launched feathercast
Happily! Let me know what is done now, and I'll see if I can make it
more easily automated.
-Brian
On Jul 18, 2004, at 5:12 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
the list was made the moment it was needed. It
*could* be created the moment it was needed.
It would be nice if we had such a mechanism. At the
This discussion, and a recent comment about the new
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have had me thinking about ASF
infrastructure, etc.
The question was asked why start discussion about continuations in the
JVM on a codehaus list when most of the people initially involved are
ASF'ers, etc?
The answer was
We hit this a number of times with svn+ssh until we got everyone to
properly set their umask. haven't had it happen since then, however.
-Brian
On Jun 11, 2004, at 2:15 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 11 Jun 2004, at 22:02, Jim Moore wrote:
Actually, the all or nothing part
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mccallister]$ umask
umask 0002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mccallister]$ umask -S
u=rwx,g=rwx,o=rx
and set the group sticky bit on the repository home so that group is
preserved
-Brian
On Jun 11, 2004, at 3:00 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Brian McCallister wrote:
We hit this a number
I suspect that getting a consensus from the ASF members, much less the
community at large, as to a stance on open source Java will be pretty
difficult. The ASF is made up of individuals, not a small number of
which are intimately involved with each of the major JVM providers.
I do think that
On Mar 18, 2004, at 9:49 AM, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
I have just a question: If Java goes GPL (as suggested by many opinion
writters), it can clash with the ASF license? I remember discussions
about
the viral nature of (L)GPL in Java language. Then if Java goes
(L)GPL it
will infect the java
I saw a link floating around a while back, but cannot find it now, to a
script to munge java sources from 1.1 to 2.0 license. Anyone have that?
Thanks,
Brian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Probably them DB people. Sketchy crowd ;-)
-Brian
On Feb 9, 2004, at 5:20 PM, Leo Simons wrote:
Thom May wrote:
malicious users
huh? Who would that be?
--
cheers,
- Leo Simons
---
Weblog -- http://leosimons.com/
IoC
On Jan 22, 2004, at 12:03 PM, Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
That said, I'm starting to feel the need
to champion the cause of disenfranchised computer bloggers. ;-)
AliceBlog!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
If we want an apache blog aggregator that is clearly NOT apache.org,
the apacheblogs.* domains are still available and the
[foo]blogs.[com|org|net] naming convention for aggregators is pretty
common.
-Brian
On Jan 8, 2004, at 11:24 AM, Ben Hyde wrote:
Cool.
Krell already scraps the rss feed
On Jan 8, 2004, at 1:38 PM, Ted Leung wrote:
Let's just register planetapache.org and be done with it.
+1
Next someone will insist that this has to go through the incubator.
It will be easier to just do it at planetapache.org and offer to
aggregate people's blogs. Apache is made up of
13 matches
Mail list logo
