> Changes made to the Cocoon wiki are mailed to the cocoon-docs mailing
> list, so inappropriate changes are spotted much more quickly. Perhaps
> a similar setup could be adopted for the Apache wiki?
The ASF wiki has that ability, with two issues:
- The Wiki is ASF-wide, and almost no one wants
> From: Andrew Savory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andrew
> Savory
> Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 12:31 PM
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 7 Jun 2003, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
>
> > However if we start seeing de-facings which take days to be noticed; then
> > we'll propably need to start adding some
Hi,
On Sat, 7 Jun 2003, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
> However if we start seeing de-facings which take days to be noticed; then
> we'll propably need to start adding some more hurdles/login's.
Changes made to the Cocoon wiki are mailed to the cocoon-docs mailing
list, so inappropriate changes
On 7/06/2003 23:43 Noel J. Bergman wrote:
The discussion of what to do about it is over on infrastructure. I'm fairly
sure from prior discussions that you are subscribed there, but just in case
...
Yep, saw that. Thanks!
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerth
On 7/06/2003 18:40 Santiago Gala wrote:
One nice thing about wikis is that they use to be self-healing. For
instance, someone (Marc?) corrected my mispelling of Marc Portier's name
in my wiki here. I noticed like one week later. Thanks.
It was me. ;-D
--
Steven Noelsh
Santiago Gala escribió:
http://c2.com/cgi/quickDiff?FrontPage (21 hours ago when this mail was
sent).
Different IP (24.49.157.156), same kind of people.
Sorry, I got it wrong. The IP up was the one restoring. The vandalism
actually came from the same IP as here.
--
Santiago Gala
High Sierra Tec
Steven Noels escribió:
The Cocoon Wiki has been the victim of exactly the same disgusting
defacement, approximately at the same moment I guess. *sigh*
http://c2.com/cgi/quickDiff?FrontPage (21 hours ago when this mail was
sent).
Different IP (24.49.157.156), same kind of people.
The image, BTW
> The Cocoon Wiki has been the victim of exactly the same disgusting
> defacement, approximately at the same moment I guess. *sigh*
The discussion of what to do about it is over on infrastructure. I'm fairly
sure from prior discussions that you are subscribed there, but just in case
...
On 7/06/2003 11:41 Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
But I am *COMPLETELY* *DISGUSTED* by what I in the page changes.
It's the most revolting pic I've EVER seen!
The Cocoon Wiki has been the victim of exactly the same disgusting
defacement, approximately at the same moment I guess. *sigh*
--
Steven Noel
If you don't have any PKI infrastructure yet and just aim for a "give me
some certificates" approach that doesn't really need to have strong
security needs, you might want to check out TinyCA
(http://tinyca.sm-zone.net/) which is a really nice, easy to use and
handy CA tool. It needs OpenSSL and pe
Noel wrote:
> My own opinion is that we could require end users to register, just as they
> have to register for a mailing list. The registration process would e-mail
> a unique SSL cert to install into a browser. With that SSL cert in place,
> users can update the Wiki. Without it, they are r
> the ASF as a US organisation should have resonable and
> demonstratable oversight over its publicly visible site.
If Wiki vandalism becomes an issue, I have a two part proposal, each part
being independent of the other:
1. Require end users to register, just as they have to
register for
> > > this opens the question of "leaving the door open with no lock" really
> > > works in the long run or if we must live with "wiki terrorists".
> > The wiki theory is that it is so easy to repair vandalism that the
immature
> > cretins basically lose interest in their juvenile activities. For
On Sat, 7 Jun 2003, Santiago Gala wrote:
> One nice thing about wikis is that they use to be self-healing. For
> instance, someone (Marc?) corrected my mispelling of Marc Portier's name
> in my wiki here. I noticed like one week later. Thanks.
Aye - but the ASF as a US organisation should have
BTW, I just noticed this page
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?WikiVandals
and added today's incident, as well as helping with the translation of
the previous vandals (some negihbours from Spain, quite possibly ADSL
from Telefonica or some company using Telefonica Data as provider).
Nicola Ken Barozzi escribió:
(...)
I think that the rule must change ASAP to use passwords, even if they
only have to be requested to the respective PMC.
:,-(
1. The page has been working very well for a lot of time. Don't panic!
(TM) ;-)
2. We could report to the ISP to which this (apparent) pp
Henning Schmiedehausen wrote, On 07/06/2003 11.10:
On Sat, 2003-06-07 at 10:40, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
...
The wiki theory is that it is so easy to repair vandalism that the immature
cretins basically lose interest in their juvenile activities. For more
discourse on the subject, see:
http://c2.com
On Sat, 2003-06-07 at 10:40, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Fixed. Someone beat me to it by a few minutes, and then I fixed up the
> formatting. If you should see something like this again, the easy thing is
> to view the most recent good version, click to edit, and then just save.
>
> > this opens th
Fixed. Someone beat me to it by a few minutes, and then I fixed up the
formatting. If you should see something like this again, the easy thing is
to view the most recent good version, click to edit, and then just save.
> this opens the question of "leaving the door open with no lock" really
> wo
* Henning Schmiedehausen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> The current homepage of the Apache Wiki
> (http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi) easily qualifies as one
> of the more disgusting pages that I had the misfortune to see this year.
>
> While it would be nice to change it back to a more
Unless put back by a daemon, has been deleted.
-ph
__
Yahoo! Plus - For a better Internet experience
http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/yplus/yoffer.html
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMA
21 matches
Mail list logo
