> VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
> this mail list thru a web archive?
>
> [X] +1 yes, let's make it readable
> [ ] 0 don't know/don't care
> [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
>
>
> - o -
>
>
> VOTE 2: would you lik
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
>
>
> Hmmm. I looked at the datestamp of the original vote message and it
> looked like I was under the 78 hour window for voting. But you are
> correct, it doesn't matter since I am just affirming the result.
>
>
I thought it was 72 hrs ? ;-)
Yeah, right, my mistake. 3 da
Hmmm. I looked at the datestamp of the original vote message and it
looked like I was under the 78 hour window for voting. But you are
correct, it doesn't matter since I am just affirming the result.
I thought it was 72 hrs ? ;-)
Glenn
-
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 04:29:16PM +0100, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> Glenn Nielsen wrote:
>
> > >VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
> > >this mail list thru a web archive?
> > >
> > > [X] +1 yes, let's make it readable
> > > [ ] 0 don't know/don't care
> > >
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
>VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
>this mail list thru a web archive?
>
> [X] +1 yes, let's make it readable
> [ ] 0 don't know/don't care
> [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
>
>
>- o -
>
>
>VOTE 2: would
> VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
> this mail list thru a web archive?
>
> [X] +1 yes, let's make it readable
> [ ] 0 don't know/don't care
> [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
>
>
> - o -
>
>
> VOTE 2: would you lik
> VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
> this mail list thru a web archive?
>
> [ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable
> [X] 0 don't know/don't care
> [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
>
>
> - o -
>
>
> VOTE 2: would you like to m
I wasn't trying to vote twice, but I thought the first attempt from this
email address would have been rejected. Sorry!
Glyn Normington
http://cvs.apache.org/~glyn
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
this mail list thru a web archive?
[X] +1 yes, let's make it readable
[ ] 0 don't know/don't care
[ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
- o -
VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible fo
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
this mail list thru a web archive?
[X] +1 yes, let's make it readable
[ ] 0 don't know/don't care
[ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
- o -
VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible fo
I agree with Stefan here. I think we need the transparency, but we want
to avoid the noise of too many people exposing their ideas. There are
better forums for them to express this. We need to keep this list
focused on what matters to us.
On Thursday, Oct 31, 2002, at 02:51 US/Pacific, Stefan B
> VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
> this mail list thru a web archive?
>
> [x] +1 yes, let's make it readable
> [ ] 0 don't know/don't care
> [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
>
>
> - o -
>
>
> VOTE 2: would you like
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
this mail list thru a web archive?
[ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable
[ ] 0 don't know/don't care
[X] -1 no, let's keep it private -sc
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
> this mail list thru a web archive?
>
> [ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable
> [ ] 0 don't know/don't care
> [X] -1 no, let's keep it private
>
>
>
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
this mail list thru a web archive?
[X] +1 yes, let's make it readable
[ ] 0 don't know/don't care
[ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
- o -
VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-co
On 31 Oct 2002, David Crossley wrote:
> > VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
> > this mail list thru a web archive?
>
> [X] +1 yes, let's make it readable
>
> > VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully
> > subscribe to this mai
On Wednesday, October 30, 2002, at 12:19 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
this mail list thru a web archive?
[ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable
[ ] 0 don't know/don't care
[X] -1 no, let's keep it private
On Wednesday, October 30, 2002, at 12:19 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
this mail list thru a web archive?
[x] +1 yes, let's make it readable
[ ] 0 don't know/don't care
[ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
VOTE 2: would you l
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
this mail list thru a web archive?
[X] +1 yes, let's make it readable
[ ] 0 don't know/don't care
[ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to
fully subscribe to thi
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 06:19:03PM +0100, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>
> VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
> this mail list thru a web archive?
>
> [X] +1 yes, let's make it readable
> [ ] 0 don't know/don't care
> [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
>
> VOTE
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
this mail list thru a web archive?
[X] +1 yes, let's make it readable
[ ] 0 don't know/don't care
[ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully
subscribe to this mai
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail
list thru a web archive?
[ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable
[ ] 0 don't know/don't care
[X] -1 no, let's keep it private
But I think it should be archived somewhere.
VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible fo
> VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
> this mail list thru a web archive?
>
> [X] +1 yes, let's make it readable
> [ ] 0 don't know/don't care
> [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
>
>
> - o -
>
>
> VOTE 2: would you lik
>VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
>this mail list thru a web archive?
>
> [ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable
> [ ] 0 don't know/don't care
> [X] -1 no, let's keep it private
>
>
>- o -
>
>
>VOTE 2: would you like to make it
10/30/2002 12:19:03 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to
>read this mail list thru a web archive?
>
> [x] +1 yes, let's make it readable
> [ ] 0 don't know/don't care
> [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
>
>VOTE 2:
Hey all,
--- Vadim Gritsenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Torsten Curdt wrote:
[snip]
> >>>VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for
> non-committers to
> >>>fully subscribe to this mail list?
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone
> >>> [ ] 0 don't know/don't care
> >>> [X] -1
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 06:19:03PM +0100, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
> this mail list thru a web archive?
>
[X] +1 yes, let's make it readable
[ ] 0 don't know/don't care
[ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
>
>
Torsten Curdt wrote:
[ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable
[X] 0 don't know/don't care
[ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to
fully subscribe to this mail list?
[ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone
[ ] 0 don't know/don't care
[X]
> VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
> this mail list thru a web archive?
>
> [ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable
> [ ] 0 don't know/don't care
> [X] -1 no, let's keep it private
>
>
> - o -
>
>
> VOTE 2: would you lik
> VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
> this mail list thru a web archive?
>
> [X] +1 yes, let's make it readable
> [ ] 0 don't know/don't care
> [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
>
>
> VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to full
> VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
> this mail list thru a web archive?
>
> [X] +1 yes, let's make it readable
> [ ] 0 don't know/don't care
> [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
>
> VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
> this mail list thru a web archive?
>
> [X] +1 yes, let's make it readable
> [ ] 0 don't know/don't care
> [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
>
> VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 04:19, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
> this mail list thru a web archive?
>
> [ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable
> [ ] 0 don't know/don't care
> [+1] -1 no, let's keep it private
>
> VOTE 2: would you li
Marc Slemko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to
> read this mail list thru a web archive?
>
>[ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable
>[X] 0 don't know/don't care
>[ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
>
> VOTE 2: would you like to m
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to
read this mail list thru a web archive?
[ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable
[X] 0 don't know/don't care
[ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to
fully subscribe to
>
> VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to
> read this mail list thru a web archive?
>
>[X] +1 yes, let's make it readable
>[ ] 0 don't know/don't care
>[ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
>
> VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to
read this mail list thru a web archive?
[X] +1 yes, let's make it readable
[ ] 0 don't know/don't care
[ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to
fully subscribe to this
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
this mail list thru a web archive?
[X] +1 yes, let's make it readable
[ ] 0 don't know/don't care
[ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to
fully subscrib
> VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to
> read this mail list thru a web archive?
>
>[X] +1 yes, let's make it readable
>[ ] 0 don't know/don't care
>[ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
>
> VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to
> fu
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to
read this mail list thru a web archive?
[X] +1 yes, let's make it readable
[ ] 0 don't know/don't care
[ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to
fully subscribe to this
> VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
> this mail list thru a web archive?
>
> [x] +1 yes, let's make it readable
> [ ] 0 don't know/don't care
> [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
>
> VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully
>
>
> --On Wednesday, October 30, 2002 6:19 PM +0100 Stefano Mazzocchi
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to
> > read this mail list thru a web archive?
> >
> > [ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable
> > [ ] 0 don't know/don't care
>
> VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
> this mail list thru a web archive?
>
> [ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable
> [ ] 0 don't know/don't care
> [X] -1 no, let's keep it private
>
>
>- o -
>
>
> VOTE 2: would you like to make
Title: RE: [VOTE] Openness
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
this mail list thru a web archive?
[X] +1 yes, let's make it readable
[ ] 0 don't know/don't care
[ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
+1
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
this mail list thru a web archive?
[ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable
[ ] 0 don't know/don't care
[X] -1 no, let's keep it private
-
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
this mail list thru a web archive?
[X] +1 yes, let's make it readable
[ ] 0 don't know/don't care
[ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
- o -
VOTE 2: would you like to ma
--- James Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why are you changing the vote here?
>
> I would like to vote but you have changed the
> direction of this vote, in a
> way that's really wierd.
>
> Currently, as i understand it, the last vote favored
> opening the list to
> invited experts, with a publ
> VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
> this mail list thru a web archive?
>
> [ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable
> [ ] 0 don't know/don't care
> [X] -1 no, let's keep it private
> VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully
>
> VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
> this mail list thru a web archive?
>
> [X] +1 yes, let's make it readable
> [ ] 0 don't know/don't care
> [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
>
>
> - o -
>
>
> VOTE 2: would you like t
* Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
> this mail list thru a web archive?
>
> [ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable
> [x] 0 don't know/don't care
> [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
> VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible fo
Morgan Delagrange wrote:
--- Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please, allow me to restart the voting in order to
make it easier to
reach some consensus since it's hard to interpret
the results of the
previous one.
+1. The last vote had way too many permutations.
+1 yes it
+1 to both.
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Please, allow me to restart the voting in order to make it easier to
reach some consensus since it's hard to interpret the results of the
previous one.
- o -
There are two different concerns for openness:
- open to read
- open
> > [ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable
> > [X] 0 don't know/don't care
> > [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
> > VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to
> > fully subscribe to this mail list?
> >
> > [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone
> > [ ] 0 don't know/don't c
Why are you changing the vote here?
I would like to vote but you have changed the direction of this vote, in a
way that's really wierd.
Currently, as i understand it, the last vote favored opening the list to
invited experts, with a public archive. How would I vote that here?
-- james
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Brad Nicholes wrote:
> VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
> this mail list thru a web archive?
>
> [ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable
> [ ] 0 don't know/don't care
> [X] -1 no, let's keep it private
>
> VOTE 2: would you like to mak
On Wednesday, October 30, 2002, at 05:19 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
this mail list thru a web archive?
[X] +1 yes, let's make it readable
[ ] 0 don't know/don't care
[ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
reason: if we need a
> VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
> this mail list thru a web archive?
>
> [X] +1 yes, let's make it readable
> [ ] 0 don't know/don't care
> [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
>
>
> - o -
>
>
> VOTE 2: would you lik
"Danny Angus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
> > > this mail list thru a web archive?
> > >
> > > [X ] +1 yes, let's make it readable
> > > [ ] 0 don't know/don't care
> > > [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
> > >
> > >
> VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for
> non-committers to read
> this mail list thru a web archive?
>
> [X] +1 yes, let's make it readable
> [ ] 0 don't know/don't care
> [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
>
>
> - o -
>
>
> VOTE 2: would you
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
this mail list thru a web archive?
[ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable
[ ] 0 don't know/don't care
[X] -1 no, let's keep it private
- o -
VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible
> VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
> this mail list thru a web archive?
>
> [ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable
> [ ] 0 don't know/don't care
> [X] -1 no, let's keep it private
> VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 06:19:03PM +0100, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>...
> VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
> this mail list thru a web archive?
>
> [ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable
> [ ] 0 don't know/don't care
> [X] -1 no, let's keep it private
>...
> VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
> this mail list thru a web archive?
>
> [X] +1 yes, let's make it readable
> [ ] 0 don't know/don't care
> [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
>
>
> - o -
>
>
> VOTE 2: would you li
* Stefano Mazzocchi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
>
> VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
> this mail list thru a web archive?
>
> [ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable
> [X] 0 don't know/don't care
> [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
>
>
>
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
this mail list thru a web archive?
[ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable
[ ] 0 don't know/don't care
[X] -1 no, let's keep it private
- o -
VOTE 2: would you like to m
--On Wednesday, October 30, 2002 6:19 PM +0100 Stefano Mazzocchi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to
read this mail list thru a web archive?
[ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable
[ ] 0 don't know/don't care
[X] -1 no, let's keep it priv
I agree:
> > VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
> > this mail list thru a web archive?
> >
> > [X ] +1 yes, let's make it readable
> > [ ] 0 don't know/don't care
> > [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
> >
> >
> >- o -
> >
> >
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
this mail list thru a web archive?
[X] +1 yes, let's make it readable
[ ] 0 don't know/don't care
[ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
- o -
VOTE 2: would you like to m
> > VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
> > this mail list thru a web archive?
> >
> >
> > [X] +1 yes, let's make it readable
> > [ ] 0 don't know/don't care
> > [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
> >
> >
> > - o -
> >
> >
> On Wednesday, October 30, 2002, at 10:19 AM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> >
> > VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for
> non-committers to read
> > this mail list thru a web archive?
> >
> > [X ] +1 yes, let's make it readable
> > [ ] 0 don't know/don't care
> > [ ] -1 no, let's keep
On Wednesday, October 30, 2002, at 10:19 AM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
this mail list thru a web archive?
[X ] +1 yes, let's make it readable
[ ] 0 don't know/don't care
[ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
this mail list thru a web archive?
[X] +1 yes, let's make it readable
VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully
subscribe to this mail list?
[X] 0 don't know/don't ca
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
this mail list thru a web archive?
[ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable
[ ] 0 don't know/don't care
[X] -1 no, let's keep it private
VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committe
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
this mail list thru a web archive?
[x] +1 yes, let's make it readable
[ ] 0 don't know/don't care
[ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
- o -
VOTE 2: would you like to ma
--- Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please, allow me to restart the voting in order to
> make it easier to
> reach some consensus since it's hard to interpret
> the results of the
> previous one.
+1. The last vote had way too many permutations.
[snip]
>
>
> Please, allow me to restart the voting in order to make it easier to
> reach some consensus since it's hard to interpret the results of the
> previous one.
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
this mail list thru a web archive?
[x] +1 yes, let's make it reada
De : Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for
> non-committers to read
> this mail list thru a web archive?
>
> [X] +1 yes, let's make it readable
> [ ] 0 don't know/don't care
> [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
>
>
>
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
this mail list thru a web archive?
[X] +1 yes, let's make it readable
[ ] 0 don't know/don't care
[ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully
subscribe to this
Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
> this mail list thru a web archive?
>
>
> [ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable
> [X] 0 don't know/don't care
> [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
>
>
>
+1 for open read and write.
Sanjiva.
- Original Message -
From: "Stefano Mazzocchi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 11:19 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Openness
> Please, allow me to restart the voting in order to make it easier to
> reach some consensus since it's har
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
this mail list thru a web archive?
[x] +1 yes, let's make it readable
VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully
subscribe to this mail list?
[x] +1 yes, let's open it
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
> this mail list thru a web archive?
>
> [ X ] +1 yes, let's make it readable
> [ ] 0 don't know/don't care
> [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
>
>
>
82 matches
Mail list logo