On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 17:20 +0900, W.Kenworthy wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 22:31 +0100, Florian Hackenberger wrote:
> > On Thursday 26 February 2009 18:08:54 Marco Trevisan (Treviño) wrote:
> > > Check your uboot commandline loglevel value... It highly impacts on the
> > > suspend/resume time. I
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 22:31 +0100, Florian Hackenberger wrote:
> On Thursday 26 February 2009 18:08:54 Marco Trevisan (Treviño) wrote:
> > Check your uboot commandline loglevel value... It highly impacts on the
> > suspend/resume time. I've set it to 3 (but some time ago was set by the
> > system t
Only part of the problem :(
There is also firmware upgrade - since moko11 (tried ~1 week) I did not
lose any calls/sms. I then moved to shr-unstable and its finally
working almost like a phone
BillK
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 17:50 -0500, Warren Baird wrote:
> Interesting!
>
> Would this
Interesting!
Would this impact resume from suspend on an incoming phone call? The
reason I abandoned the 2008.X family was that I was missing 3/4 of my
incoming calls because by the time the phone unsuspended I had missed the
call... If this will fix it, maybe I can finally move off QtE...
Wa
On Thursday 26 February 2009 18:08:54 Marco Trevisan (Treviño) wrote:
> Check your uboot commandline loglevel value... It highly impacts on the
> suspend/resume time. I've set it to 3 (but some time ago was set by the
> system to 8, and I had to wait more than 6-7 seconds to wake the phone,
> while
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:08 PM, "Marco Trevisan (Treviño)"
wrote:
> Florian Hackenberger wrote:
>> I noticed that suspending / resuming on 2008.12 is quite fast compared
>> to SHR. The difference which is most noticeable is that SHR switches to
>> a virtual terminal before and right after suspen
Florian Hackenberger wrote:
> I noticed that suspending / resuming on 2008.12 is quite fast compared
> to SHR. The difference which is most noticeable is that SHR switches to
> a virtual terminal before and right after suspending, as opposed to
> 2008.12 which resumes right into X. Is there a wa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
|
|>> I don't think that they simply disable the backlight. Resuming from SHR
|>> unstable takes about 5-6 seconds (no incoming call), while 2008.12
resumes
|>> under 3 seconds.
Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
>> I don't think that they simply disable the backlight. Resuming from SHR
>> unstable takes about 5-6 seconds (no incoming call), while 2008.12 resumes
>> under 3 seconds. While this is not a scientific measurement, 2008.12 surely
>> is a lot faster. Any other ide
> It'll just be different loglevel= or console= on kernel commandline
> depending on which bootloader and where you're booting from.
which for which and where to find information on the parameters?
and btw: is there a way to do that to an already running system, sysfs or
so? i never had any luck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| Are you booting from NAND or NOR flash? I know when I boot from NAND
| flash I see a bunch of text scroll by on resume. I don't see that
| when booted from NOR. I don't know why... Have you tried that?
Are you booting from NAND or NOR flash? I know when I boot from NAND
flash I see a bunch of text scroll by on resume. I don't see that
when booted from NOR. I don't know why... Have you tried that?
-Steven
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 2:32 AM, Florian Hackenberger
wrote:
> I suspect that we could
Am Mittwoch, den 25.02.2009, 19:05 +0100 schrieb Florian Hackenberger:
> On Monday 23 February 2009 12:08:10 Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
> > Am Montag, den 23.02.2009, 09:32 +0100 schrieb Florian Hackenberger:
> > > I noticed that suspending / resuming on 2008.12 is quite fast compared
> > > to S
On Monday 23 February 2009 12:08:10 Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
> Am Montag, den 23.02.2009, 09:32 +0100 schrieb Florian Hackenberger:
> > I noticed that suspending / resuming on 2008.12 is quite fast compared
> > to SHR. The difference which is most noticeable is that SHR switches to
> > a virtu
Am Montag, den 23.02.2009, 09:32 +0100 schrieb Florian Hackenberger:
> I noticed that suspending / resuming on 2008.12 is quite fast compared
> to SHR. The difference which is most noticeable is that SHR switches to
> a virtual terminal before and right after suspending, as opposed to
> 2008.12
Florian Hackenberger writes:
> behaviour on SHR? I suspect that we could save at least a second of
Are you sure? To me it seemed that 2008.12 just turned the backlight
on only when you were already in X?
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@l
Hi!
I noticed that suspending / resuming on 2008.12 is quite fast compared
to SHR. The difference which is most noticeable is that SHR switches to
a virtual terminal before and right after suspending, as opposed to
2008.12 which resumes right into X. Is there a way to replicate this
behaviour
17 matches
Mail list logo
