Re: IAX2/Asterisk + Openmoko FreeRunner

2008-05-18 Thread Al Johnson
On Sunday 18 May 2008, Brandon Kruse wrote: > On May 18, 2008, at 9:09 AM, Al Johnson > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I never said it was perfect, just another option. I have no > > affiliation to > > either digium or trixbox, but I did try both ISOs when i was > > starting out > > with asterisk

Re: IAX2/Asterisk + Openmoko FreeRunner

2008-05-18 Thread Brandon Kruse
On May 18, 2008, at 11:40 AM, Andy Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sunday 18 May 2008 16:15, Brandon Kruse wrote: I have to make a clean install tonight, so I will work on it ;) like I said, my build environment was not standard. :D good stuff Totally. Hopefully the end result wil

Re: IAX2/Asterisk + Openmoko FreeRunner

2008-05-18 Thread Andy Powell
On Sunday 18 May 2008 16:15, Brandon Kruse wrote: > > I have to make a clean install tonight, so I will work on it ;) like I > said, my build environment was not standard. :D good stuff > > I had portaudio in its own ipkg, I hope someone can fix that :) essentially thats what I ended up doin

Re: IAX2/Asterisk + Openmoko FreeRunner

2008-05-18 Thread Brandon Kruse
On May 18, 2008, at 9:09 AM, Al Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I never said it was perfect, just another option. I have no affiliation to either digium or trixbox, but I did try both ISOs when i was starting out with asterisk. I don't use either any more - CentOS, asterisk, vi. I di

Re: IAX2/Asterisk + Openmoko FreeRunner

2008-05-18 Thread Brandon Kruse
On May 18, 2008, at 3:45 AM, Stroller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 17 May 2008, at 18:16, Doug Hawkins wrote: ... There are a few "hassles" with the Nokia software that I'm looking forward to making sure are "clean" with the OpenMoko system when I get to start playing on one. One is that

Re: IAX2/Asterisk + Openmoko FreeRunner

2008-05-18 Thread Brandon Kruse
Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Saturday 17 May 2008 23:42, Brandon Kruse wrote: The freerunner images would be great, Ok, I'll do that soon. and its great that you can get it to build with the latest toolchain stuff, etc. I might build a Ahh well, no. Not quite. I can get the suppor

Re: IAX2/Asterisk + Openmoko FreeRunner

2008-05-18 Thread Brandon Kruse
On May 18, 2008, at 9:09 AM, Al Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I never said it was perfect, just another option. I have no affiliation to either digium or trixbox, but I did try both ISOs when i was starting out with asterisk. I don't use either any more - CentOS, asterisk, vi. I didn

Re: IAX2/Asterisk + Openmoko FreeRunner

2008-05-18 Thread Al Johnson
I never said it was perfect, just another option. I have no affiliation to either digium or trixbox, but I did try both ISOs when i was starting out with asterisk. I don't use either any more - CentOS, asterisk, vi. I didn't give AsteriskNOW much time because it wouldn't play easily with the no

Re: Wireless Radio/Accelerometer-based Triggers (was: IAX2/Asterisk + Openmoko FreeRunner)

2008-05-18 Thread Brandon Kruger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stroller wrote: | | On 17 May 2008, at 18:16, Doug Hawkins wrote: |> ... |> There are a few "hassles" with the Nokia software that I'm looking forward to making sure are "clean" with the OpenMoko system when I get to start playing on one. One is th

Re: IAX2/Asterisk + Openmoko FreeRunner

2008-05-18 Thread Andy Powell
On Saturday 17 May 2008 23:42, Brandon Kruse wrote: > > The freerunner images would be great, Ok, I'll do that soon. > and its great that you can get > it to build with the latest toolchain stuff, etc. I might build a Ahh well, no. Not quite. I can get the supporting libs to build just not the

Re: IAX2/Asterisk + Openmoko FreeRunner

2008-05-18 Thread Stroller
On 17 May 2008, at 18:16, Doug Hawkins wrote: ... There are a few "hassles" with the Nokia software that I'm looking forward to making sure are "clean" with the OpenMoko system when I get to start playing on one. One is that on some "free" (airport & community) WiFi systems, you have to o

Re: IAX2/Asterisk + Openmoko FreeRunner

2008-05-17 Thread Brandon Kruse
On May 17, 2008, at 4:19 PM, Andy Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Saturday 17 May 2008 20:55, Brandon Kruse wrote: I think that it's a dialer function - however it would be nice if other applications could tell the dialer how to dial. Since dbus seems to be the interface that's goi

Re: IAX2/Asterisk + Openmoko FreeRunner

2008-05-17 Thread Brandon Kruse
On May 17, 2008, at 5:26 PM, Andy Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Saturday 17 May 2008 23:09, Andy Powell wrote: On Saturday 17 May 2008 22:19, Andy Powell wrote: libogg, portaudio and libspeex compiled ok, although I have to change libtool to say where arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-ranlib

Re: IAX2/Asterisk + Openmoko FreeRunner

2008-05-17 Thread Andy Powell
On Saturday 17 May 2008 23:09, Andy Powell wrote: > On Saturday 17 May 2008 22:19, Andy Powell wrote: > > libogg, portaudio and libspeex compiled ok, although I have to change > > libtool to say where arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-ranlib was located. > > > > iaxclient_moko however refuses to find the

Re: IAX2/Asterisk + Openmoko FreeRunner

2008-05-17 Thread Andy Powell
On Saturday 17 May 2008 22:19, Andy Powell wrote: > libogg, portaudio and libspeex compiled ok, although I have to change > libtool to say where arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-ranlib was located. > > iaxclient_moko however refuses to find the installed portaudio > Managed to sort that out, then neede

Re: IAX2/Asterisk + Openmoko FreeRunner

2008-05-17 Thread Andy Powell
On Saturday 17 May 2008 20:55, Brandon Kruse wrote: > > > > I think that it's a dialer function - however it would be nice if other > > applications could tell the dialer how to dial. Since dbus seems to be > > the interface that's going to be used it might be nice to have the option > > there t

Re: IAX2/Asterisk + Openmoko FreeRunner

2008-05-17 Thread Brandon Kruse
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Andy Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday 17 May 2008 18:07, Brandon Kruse wrote: > > > > > > > That's not always a good thing. > > > > I agree. > > Compliance has been extremely difficult. > > > > Amen! Another "ugh" for compliance across browsers :(

Re: IAX2/Asterisk + Openmoko FreeRunner

2008-05-17 Thread Andy Powell
On Saturday 17 May 2008 18:07, Brandon Kruse wrote: > > > > That's not always a good thing. > > I agree. > Compliance has been extremely difficult. > Amen! > >> Trixbox uses PHP/mysql/apache2, whereas the AsteriskGUI uses the > >> builtin > >> Asterisk HTTP Server, and javascript files (because

Re: IAX2/Asterisk + Openmoko FreeRunner

2008-05-17 Thread Doug Hawkins
Hi Brandon, This sounds great! I currently run two Nokia E-series phones (mine & my wife's) that are connected to both WiFi & GSM doing exactly this (incoming calls on both networks, outgoing preferred over one of several VoIP connections). Also, I switch WiFi networks regularly throughout

Re: IAX2/Asterisk + Openmoko FreeRunner

2008-05-17 Thread Brandon Kruse
On May 17, 2008, at 10:31 AM, Andy Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Saturday 17 May 2008 01:06, Brandon Kruse wrote: One more thing, The Digium Asterisk-GUI was designed ALL clientside (It is ALL javascript). That's not always a good thing. I agree. Compliance has been extremely diff

Re: IAX2/Asterisk + Openmoko FreeRunner

2008-05-17 Thread Andy Powell
On Saturday 17 May 2008 01:06, Brandon Kruse wrote: > One more thing, > > The Digium Asterisk-GUI was designed ALL clientside (It is ALL javascript). That's not always a good thing. > Trixbox uses PHP/mysql/apache2, whereas the AsteriskGUI uses the builtin > Asterisk HTTP Server, and javascript f

Re: IAX2/Asterisk + Openmoko FreeRunner

2008-05-16 Thread Brandon Kruse
One more thing, The Digium Asterisk-GUI was designed ALL clientside (It is ALL javascript). Trixbox uses PHP/mysql/apache2, whereas the AsteriskGUI uses the builtin Asterisk HTTP Server, and javascript files (because we believe that there should never be unneeded load on the box that your phone c

Re: IAX2/Asterisk + Openmoko FreeRunner

2008-05-16 Thread Brandon Kruse
Heh, Try to actually edit the config files and then use it :P >From experience, asteriskNOW is my favorite, and the first platform I am going to get the client to work with automatically. (I am going to add an 'openmoko' option in the AsteriskGUI) AsteriskNOW Also has Digital / Analog card supp

Re: IAX2/Asterisk + Openmoko FreeRunner

2008-05-16 Thread Al Johnson
Another bootable ISO to look at its trixbox http://www.trixbox.com/products/trixbox-ce/features Both make setting up an asterisk server very easy. They also run reasonably in a virtual machine. trixbox has a few more bells and whistles; whether this is good or bad is a matter of opinion, as is p

Re: IAX2/Asterisk + Openmoko FreeRunner

2008-05-15 Thread Vinc Duran
Thanks Brian, That sounds very cool. I was wondering how that would work. I'm very excited to see how it all works out. V On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 6:39 PM, Brandon Kruse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Vinc Duran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hi Brandon, >> I'm an e

Re: IAX2/Asterisk + Openmoko FreeRunner

2008-05-15 Thread Brandon Kruse
I will do Michael. That could have been the problem with my 1973 prototype, so thank you for keeping me updated. I am hoping to have the packages rebuilt by Friday and start the overall integration, at least giving the end user a simple console application to start testing :) I passed a call via

Re: IAX2/Asterisk + Openmoko FreeRunner

2008-05-15 Thread Brandon Kruse
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Vinc Duran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Brandon, > I'm an end-user for the most part. > Do you think you can get the freerunner to emulate a common ip phone? > I'm imagining using it with TalkSwitch or any general ip based system. > Thanks > > On Thu, May 15, 20

Re: IAX2/Asterisk + Openmoko FreeRunner

2008-05-15 Thread Brandon Kruse
D] *On Behalf Of *Brandon Kruse > *Sent:* Thursday, May 15, 2008 2:00 PM > *To:* List for Openmoko community discussion > *Subject:* IAX2/Asterisk + Openmoko FreeRunner > > > > Hey Guys, > > Just want to keep the community updated. > > I was one of the few developers

Re: IAX2/Asterisk + Openmoko FreeRunner

2008-05-15 Thread Brandon Kruse
Yes, The iaxclient library I am implementing it in supports very very low bandwidth protocols. I have made a call of GPRS before, the only thing is the latency, but it's somewhat useable still. I have worked on the GUI for Digium, so go here and install asterisk + the asteriskGUI (AsteriskNOW bo

Re: IAX2/Asterisk + Openmoko FreeRunner

2008-05-15 Thread Brandon Kruse
Great! Basically, when the source can be built into an ipkg pretty easily. I want someone to test the "testcall" application I ported to see about audio quality, controls, etc. -bk On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Steven Kurylo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Bran

Re: IAX2/Asterisk + Openmoko FreeRunner

2008-05-15 Thread Michael Shiloh
Hi Brandon, Thanks for the update. This might be the excuse I'm looking for to set up Asterisk at home. Although I tested your phone before I sent it to you. Unless I made a mistake, it worked then. What concerns me is that I do have one other phone that doesn't seem to take sound in via the

Re: IAX2/Asterisk + Openmoko FreeRunner

2008-05-15 Thread Vinc Duran
Hi Brandon, I'm an end-user for the most part. Do you think you can get the freerunner to emulate a common ip phone? I'm imagining using it with TalkSwitch or any general ip based system. Thanks On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Brandon Kruse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey Guys, > > Just want to

RE: IAX2/Asterisk + Openmoko FreeRunner

2008-05-15 Thread steve
Thanks Brandon, we appreciate your contributions. _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brandon Kruse Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 2:00 PM To: List for Openmoko community discussion Subject: IAX2/Asterisk + Openmoko FreeRunner Hey Guys, Just want

Re: IAX2/Asterisk + Openmoko FreeRunner

2008-05-15 Thread Steven Kurylo
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Brandon Kruse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The goal of this project is to seamlessly tie into the openmoko dialer > application as a 'gateway', so that you could chose to dial out over GSM or > dial out over IAX2 (wifi, possibly GPRS). > > If you would like to help

Re: IAX2/Asterisk + Openmoko FreeRunner

2008-05-15 Thread Travis Tabbal
As a future user, I'm glad to hear about progress in this area. It might get me to actually set up an Asterisk server. :) Can we really get the datastream small enough for GPRS? ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists

IAX2/Asterisk + Openmoko FreeRunner

2008-05-15 Thread Brandon Kruse
Hey Guys, Just want to keep the community updated. I was one of the few developers who have received a freerunner (gta02) in the mail a couple days back. Since then I have been updating all my latest packages (http://bkruse.com, and the mokoiax project page), will check in my code tonight. The