Re: Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts

2007-07-20 Thread Santiago Crespo
El lun, 16-07-2007 a las 13:10 -0400, Ian Darwin escribió: Calling it the free(d) phone to consumers (as opposed to developers) is going to engender an enormous amount of confusion and ill-will. Call it something else in the consumer market. The Flexible Phone. The

Re: Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts

2007-07-20 Thread Ted Lemon
On Jul 20, 2007, at 2:31 AM, Santiago Crespo wrote: I like the spanish term: libre (like in ubuntu cd-box). It's not a bad word, but unfortunately when I hear it I get an image of a guy wearing army fatigues and carrying an automatic weapon. To some extent I think choosing a branding

Re: Not the free phone

2007-07-18 Thread Arndt Heuvel
Am Montag, 16. Juli 2007 22:14 schrieb Ken Young: How 'bout For those who prefer JTAG to Bluetooth. or It's not just a phone, it's a hobby. or Get one before the phone companies figure out what they are. OpenMoko - and you even own the ghost in

Re: Not the free phone

2007-07-17 Thread ramsesoriginal
On 7/16/07, Visti Andresen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Perhaps a different name different locations ;o) The Phone for The Matrix tm. The One Phone for Mddle-earth. The Next Generation Phone for Star Trek tm conventions. The True Phone for religious occasions. Ok, that's not a bad idea.

Re: Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts

2007-07-17 Thread ramsesoriginal
The Open Phone Our Phone The Human Phone (ok, sounds a bit like Ubuntu) Free your Phone (wich obviously is not the same as The free phone. It sounds good, and is already used in the youtube ads) More then a Phone Phone++ The Phone from people to people The Freedom Phone Teh ub3rz h4ck70r7

Re: Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts

2007-07-17 Thread Mikko Rauhala
ti, 2007-07-17 kello 09:59 +0200, ramsesoriginal kirjoitti: p.s. i hate the way gmail handles this list. couldn't we have the respond-to adress set to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hate gmail and complain to them all you want, please don't imply the list should be broken because of that. I shan't continue

Re: Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts

2007-07-17 Thread Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik
On 13:25:09 2007-07-17 Robin Paulson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/17/07, Mikko Rauhala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ti, 2007-07-17 kello 09:59 +0200, ramsesoriginal kirjoitti: p.s. i hate the way gmail handles this list. couldn't we have the respond-to adress set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts

2007-07-17 Thread Jim Paris
p.s. i hate the way gmail handles this list. couldn't we have the respond-to adress set to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Having the list server change the reply-to header is wrong. Please read http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful I don't use Gmail, but a quick google search tells me

Re: Not the free phone

2007-07-17 Thread Mark Chandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Giles Jones wrote: On 16 Jul 2007, at 19:49, Ryan Prior wrote: I like the tagline Your phone, your way. The idea is that we are putting the consumer in control - this line may mean different things to a techie and non-techie, but that's okay - it ties in with the

Re: Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts

2007-07-17 Thread digger vermont
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 09:59 +0200, ramsesoriginal wrote: The Open Phone Our Phone Just oPhone I've always dislike the I and My stuff. digger ___ OpenMoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org

Re: Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts

2007-07-17 Thread Luit van Drongelen
oPhone sounds great too... but not this oPhone: http://soapbox.msn.com/video.aspx?vid=79996a20-e2de-4757-8d22-dfc5a44acfc7 -- Luit On 7/17/07, digger vermont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 09:59 +0200, ramsesoriginal wrote: The Open Phone Our Phone Just oPhone I've

Re: Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts

2007-07-17 Thread Giles Jones
Digger Vermont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : Just oPhone I've always dislike the I and My stuff. Not even sure it should be branded as just a phone. Always preferred the communicator label myself :) --- G O Jones ___ OpenMoko community mailing

Re: Not the free phone

2007-07-17 Thread Ben Burdette
Great video! the OFone, which way is up on this thing? I'd rather not go with oPhone, it sounds derivative of the iPhone. Like the openmoko phone is a cheap wannabe iPhone. I don't people to have that impression. What about a nice industrial-style alphanumeric designation - like the 'FIC

Re: Not the free phone

2007-07-17 Thread Ian Darwin
Ben Burdette wrote: Great video! the OFone, which way is up on this thing? I'd rather not go with oPhone, it sounds derivative of the iPhone. Like the openmoko phone is a cheap wannabe iPhone. I don't people to have that impression. What about a nice industrial-style alphanumeric

Re: Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts

2007-07-17 Thread Joe Pfeiffer
Robin Paulson writes: it's nothing to do with gmail. the reply-to field has not been set on the openmoko mail server, so replies to messages default to the sender. this is fine in most cases, but not on mailing lists This has been discussed to death in the past, with no consensus on what proper

Re: Not the free phone

2007-07-17 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
On Tuesday 17 July 2007 16:54:45 Ian Darwin wrote: What about a nice industrial-style alphanumeric designation - like the 'FIC A1'. Or OM1. Or FS1, whatever. Well, you know, we're pretty far off the topic I started here. The phone being sold now *is* called the FIC Neo1973, period. IMHO

Re: Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts

2007-07-17 Thread Ted Lemon
On Jul 17, 2007, at 12:59 AM, ramsesoriginal wrote: Teh ub3rz h4ck70r7 Ph0n3!!11oneeleven Perfect. :') Honestly, I don't think this is something that one needs to worry about. What's going to happen if OpenMoko really becomes usable is that various vendors will adopt it in markets

Re: Not the free phone

2007-07-16 Thread Mike
Ian Darwin wrote: Call it something else in the consumer market. The Flexible Phone. The Does-what-you-want-not-what the big corporations want. I don't know. How about The Freedom Phone. ___ OpenMoko community mailing list

Re: Not the free phone

2007-07-16 Thread Dirk Bergstrom
Mike wrote: How about The Freedom Phone. Makes me think of American flags and jingoistic phrases. Probably a non-starter in the US... ___ OpenMoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org

Re: Not the free phone

2007-07-16 Thread Dirk Bergstrom
Ian Darwin wrote: The phrase free phone already means the opposite of what we want it to mean. It's done, finished, over. Move on. Ugh, Ian's right. That phrase has been violently co-opted by the carriers. Much as I like The free(d) phone, I don't think we can use that anywhere outside the

Re: Not the free phone

2007-07-16 Thread Pius A. Uzamere II
I agree with your first sentence, but came up with precisely the opposite conclusion! I think Freedom Phone would work extremely well in the US. On 7/16/07, Dirk Bergstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mike wrote: How about The Freedom Phone. Makes me think of American flags and jingoistic

Re: Not the free phone

2007-07-16 Thread Dirk Bergstrom
Pius A. Uzamere II wrote: I agree with your first sentence, but came up with precisely the opposite conclusion! I think Freedom Phone would work extremely well in the US. The set of people who would want a Freedom Phone probably does not have much overlap with the set of people who would

Re: Not the free phone

2007-07-16 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
On Monday 16 July 2007 19:19:49 Mike wrote: Ian Darwin wrote: Call it something else in the consumer market. The Flexible Phone. The Does-what-you-want-not-what the big corporations want. I don't know. How about The Freedom Phone. How about centering around liberty instead of free (which

Re: Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts

2007-07-16 Thread Vincent
On 16/07/07, Ian Darwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I completely agree. My idea is to make two advertisment campains: one on maisntream media: maybe tv, maybe radio, flyre, poster, newspapers, wathever. This ads would be something like: The free phone, OpenMoko. The only one with The

Re: Not the free phone

2007-07-16 Thread Pius A. Uzamere II
We definitely don't want to get into politics here. :D All I'll say is that the people who want an open source phone will get it as soon as they hear that the phone will run their own apps. It's the non-technical people to whom we'll need to make a case. On 7/16/07, Dirk Bergstrom [EMAIL

Re: Not the free phone

2007-07-16 Thread Visti Andresen
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 10:20:24 -0700 Dirk Bergstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mike wrote: How about The Freedom Phone. Makes me think of American flags and jingoistic phrases. Probably a non-starter in the US... Yes Freedom has a slightly bitter taste these days... How about The Liberated

RE: Not the free phone

2007-07-16 Thread John Seghers
Dirk Bergstrom wrote: Ian Darwin wrote: The phrase free phone already means the opposite of what we want it to mean. It's done, finished, over. Move on. Ugh, Ian's right. That phrase has been violently co-opted by the carriers. Much as I like The free(d) phone, I don't think we can

Re: Not the free phone

2007-07-16 Thread kent
How about Your Own Phone, or maybe just Your Phone, meaning that you really own it? Regarding reply-to munging -- don't want to revisit this ancient debate, but -- please don't :-) Best Regards Kent ___ OpenMoko community mailing list

Re: Not the free phone

2007-07-16 Thread Mickael Faivre-Macon
free in it. Exercice left to the reader :) On 7/16/07, Marc-Olivier Barre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Damn... hit reply, needed reply-to all ;-) -- Forwarded message -- From: Marc-Olivier Barre [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Jul 16, 2007 7:54 PM Subject: Re: Not the free phone To: Dirk

Re: Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts

2007-07-16 Thread Shawn Rutledge
How about simply the youPhone, or uPhone? On 7/16/07, Ian Darwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I completely agree. My idea is to make two advertisment campains: one on maisntream media: maybe tv, maybe radio, flyre, poster, newspapers, wathever. This ads would be something like: The free phone,

Re: Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts

2007-07-16 Thread Marc-Olivier Barre
On 7/16/07, Shawn Rutledge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How about simply the youPhone, or uPhone? First thing I thought about when I saw youPhone was youTube... it seems a bit to obvious, sorry. __ Marc-Olivier Barre. ___ OpenMoko

Re: Not the free phone

2007-07-16 Thread Ryan Prior
I like the tagline Your phone, your way. The idea is that we are putting the consumer in control - this line may mean different things to a techie and non-techie, but that's okay - it ties in with the spirit of freedom. On 7/16/07, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ian Darwin wrote: Call it

Re: Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts

2007-07-16 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
On Monday 16 July 2007 20:24:18 Shawn Rutledge wrote: How about simply the youPhone, or uPhone? u is often short for the Greek letter \mu (in Latex notation) which in turn is used as a sign for micro in many places. That may confuse people as it might mean microphone then? pgpPDRRoFs3Pl.pgp

Re: Not the free phone

2007-07-16 Thread Giles Jones
On 16 Jul 2007, at 19:49, Ryan Prior wrote: I like the tagline Your phone, your way. The idea is that we are putting the consumer in control - this line may mean different things to a techie and non-techie, but that's okay - it ties in with the spirit of freedom. Maybe, but then I

Re: Not the free phone

2007-07-16 Thread Ryan Prior
That is absolutely true! No amount of marketing to non-techies will help until we have a solid software stack which includes UI responsiveness and a tested user interface. The idea is not to start a ad campaign immediately -- the idea is to be ready when the time for advertising comes! Speaking

Re: Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts

2007-07-16 Thread Tim Newsom
OK.. Great minds think alike... Or maybe not. /grin On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 12:11, Shawn Rutledge wrote: How about simply the youPhone, or uPhone? On 7/16/07, Ian Darwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I completely agree. My idea is to make two advertisment campains: one on maisntream media: maybe

Re: Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts

2007-07-16 Thread Shawn Rutledge
I thought of that too but don't see it as a problem. Still seems like a euphonious name to me. On 7/16/07, Marc-Olivier Barre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/16/07, Shawn Rutledge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How about simply the youPhone, or uPhone? First thing I thought about when I saw

Re: Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts - unleash

2007-07-16 Thread Eric Smith
Unleash your phone. Original Message Shawn Rutledge on Mon-16-Jul 07 8:24PM A consumer ad campaign is NOT the place to push the free as in beer vs free as in speech argument. The phrase free phone already means the opposite of what we want it to mean. It's done, finished, over. Move on.

Re: Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts - unleash

2007-07-16 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On 7/16/07, Eric Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unleash your phone. Neo 1973 : phone - and more OpenMoko : not just a phone -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen, Norway ___ OpenMoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org

Re: Not the free phone

2007-07-16 Thread David \Lefty\ Schlesinger
Giles Jones wrote: Maybe, but then I think all the marketing is academic without the software being there and working. Oh, finally. Thanks, Giles. I'd have to say that academic is an understatement: if you actually sold one to someone who wasn't capable of building and installing a Linux system

Re: Not the free phone (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts - unleash

2007-07-16 Thread Giles Jones
On 16 Jul 2007, at 22:13, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: On 7/16/07, Eric Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unleash your phone. Neo 1973 : phone - and more OpenMoko : not just a phone Neo 1973 - The phone you truly own. ___ OpenMoko community mailing

Re: Not the free phone

2007-07-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Giles Jones wrote: On 16 Jul 2007, at 19:49, Ryan Prior wrote: I like the tagline Your phone, your way. The idea is that we are putting the consumer in control - this line may mean different things to a techie and non-techie, but that's okay - it ties in with the spirit of freedom.

Re: Not the free phone

2007-07-16 Thread Daniel Robinson
Let's make it work first. On 7/16/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Giles Jones wrote: On 16 Jul 2007, at 19:49, Ryan Prior wrote: I like the tagline Your phone, your way. The idea is that we are putting the consumer in control - this line may mean different things to a