> On Jun 14, 2022, at 14:32 , Amin Dayekh wrote:
>
> Dear members,
> my attention was drawn to another misleading video of known sources who are
> taking maliciously all steps against the Members of AfriNIC and AfriNIC.
>
> in the Video I noticed a misleading statement about the "Government
Owen,
Don’t rush, all in good time.
Yes Misleading the public on claims and claims and claims with no single
piece of evidence!
AfriNic acted according to the Bylaw and court, allow me here to refresh
your memory, if the ipv4 is not restricted to ise in Africa then why the
proposals for inter RI
Owen,
One question which a yes or no question:
Is it allowed by afrinic with the provisions of bylaws written in Good
faith relying on the integrity of Members, is it Allowed to Sell IPV4 ?
On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 5:22 PM Amin Dayekh wrote:
> Owen,
>
> Don’t rush, all in good time.
>
> Yes Mis
> On Jun 15, 2022, at 09:22 , Amin Dayekh wrote:
>
> Owen,
>
> Don’t rush, all in good time.
>
> Yes Misleading the public on claims and claims and claims with no single
> piece of evidence!
>
> AfriNic acted according to the Bylaw and court, allow me here to refresh your
> memory, if th
> On Jun 15, 2022, at 09:29 , Amin Dayekh wrote:
>
> Owen,
>
> One question which a yes or no question:
>
> Is it allowed by afrinic with the provisions of bylaws written in Good faith
> relying on the integrity of Members, is it Allowed to Sell IPV4 ?
The bylaws are mute on this subject… I
Owen,
for the sake of time, I will quote and reply and highlighted in red from
your ext
*quote: ( Because many resource holders wish to be able to sell their
underutilized resources in a worldwide secondary market. ) *you used the
term sell, in another reply you denied selling, anyway whatever the
pls save this answer for later, just remember what you said here and i will
prove you wrong regardless the companies you mentioned as i have no
affiliation with them i dont comment on them.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 6:33 PM Owen DeLong wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 15, 2022, at 09:29 , Amin Dayekh wrote:
>
Hi Ish
Well no if Afrinic were subject to the laws of a different state the
litigation might fall away because of endemic corruption and political
malfeasance in that state. Mauritius is a proper jurisdiction (the country
is not perfect - I really wish I'd get to spend more time outside Port
Louis
On 15 Jun 2022, at 1:30 PM, Owen DeLong via Community-Discuss
mailto:community-discuss@afrinic.net>> wrote:
...
AFRINIC has not won or last any cases yet regarding the geographical
restriction of IP Utilization. This is more misinformation from you.
I expect that with regard to that particular
On Wed, 15 Jun 2022, 22:58 Paul Hjul, wrote:
> Hi Ish
>
> Well no if Afrinic were subject to the laws of a different state the
> litigation might fall away because of endemic corruption and political
> malfeasance in that state. Mauritius is a proper jurisdiction (the country
> is not perfect - I
In message
Amin Dayekh wrote:
>in the Video I noticed a misleading statement about the "Government of
>Pakistan" but when i paused and looked at the document it is the Pakistan
>tELECOM authority and not the government itself.
I'm glad that you brought that up, because I saw that video also, an
In message
Amin Dayekh wrote:
>AfriNic acted according to the Bylaw and court, allow me here to refresh
>your memory, if the ipv4 is not restricted to ise in Africa then why the
>proposals for inter RIR transfer and Other proposals from the Meeting which
>are available online?
With respect to t
In message
Paul Hjul wrote:
>This is why Badru would be opposed to Delaware. I don't think Delaware is
>the right jurisdiction for Afrinic because my understanding is even more so
>than Mauritius Delaware is "management friendly" so for a members based
>organization as opposed to a startup with
13 matches
Mail list logo
