I think your money is safe.
I'm not sure if the first milestone has been reached, can Mogo actually
beat you under similar conditions in a 9x9 match?I don't mean just
to win games, but can it win a long match?
Until you can be beaten pretty consistently at 9x9, I believe there is
little
On 5/25/07, Don Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there some kind of bet on this?When did that happen? What is
the bet exactly?
Somewhere around 2000, I claimed I would not be beaten by a computer
under match conditions (eg. 10 games at 1hr per side + byo-yomi)
within 10 years. Which D
Is there some kind of bet on this?When did that happen? What is
the bet exactly?
- Don
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 20:47 -0400, John Tromp wrote:
> On 5/24/07, Darren Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > P.S. John, it says the new algorithm can topple strong players - shall
> > we just believe th
On 5/24/07, Darren Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
P.S. John, it says the new algorithm can topple strong players - shall
we just believe them and say I won that bet? We don't really need to
play the games out to prove it do we ;-).
On 9x9 they definitely can. I've lost a few games myself to th
I have been running GnuGo3.7.10 as one of the anchors on the CGOS 19x19 server,
and there don't
seem to be a lot of non-gnu players on the server over the last few days.
Since the load on my dual-core machine is negligible, I'd like to volunteer to
host an additional Go player, the better to hel
I googled "unpruning", and the one reference found at
http://socrates.berkeley.edu:7047/cgi-bin/dbi_view?xy=12&page_idx=79&m_area_idx=2&key_idx=1102
uses "unprune" to refer to the decision not to prune a plant at all. Therefore,
some plants would be pruned, while other plants would be "unpruned"
While grafting is almost always something foreign ( "scion" ) wed to a root
stock, there are examples of arborscuplture, where all parts of the graft
appear to be of the same stock:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Neadle.jpg
On the other hand, the method under discussion appears to be a meth
On 5/24/07, Chaslot G (MICC) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Question for native English speakers: do you think this technique is best
described by "progressive unpruning" or "progressive widening"?
Widening and pruning have different implications, at least to me (a
native English speaker).
Wideni
On 5/25/07, Peter Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was under the impression that grafting was used more often for attaching
a foreign branch (e.g., to make a pear grow on an apple tree) than for
repair. I'm probably wrong about this.
That's the same that I've heard. It may be the norm tha
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Richard Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes
Nick Wedd wrote:
I prefer "unprune" to "graft".
"Graft" implies adding something to a tree which does not naturally
belong there.
Not "naturally"?
Consider a tree, to which you, the tree surgeon, have taken a pair of
Since I'm on a Mac ("It'll be beautiful, but we're not giving it to
you until it's good and ready!"), I'm still using Java 5.
Peter Drake
http://www.lclark.edu/~drake/
On May 25, 2007, at 10:17 AM, Brian Slesinsky wrote:
Have you noticed a difference between Java 5 and 6? I've heard some
I was under the impression that grafting was used more often for
attaching a foreign branch (e.g., to make a pear grow on an apple
tree) than for repair. I'm probably wrong about this.
Still, in a graft, the thing being grafted on exists and is attached
to the tree. The algorithm in questio
Have you noticed a difference between Java 5 and 6? I've heard some
programs get a nice boost.
- Brian
On 5/25/07, Peter Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For what it's worth, I'm getting over 25k playouts per second in Java on my
4-core 3GHz machine using Orego.
Single easiest improvement: us
>From the www page, this python effort actually does use Lukasz' libraries for
>efficiency.
From: Don Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I don't believe this is a truly workable model. It's often stated as a
fundamental working model (especially for language advocates of tcl,
ruby, python, etc.) but
Nick Wedd wrote:
I prefer "unprune" to "graft".
"Graft" implies adding something to a tree which does not naturally
belong there.
Not "naturally"?
Consider a tree, to which you, the tree surgeon, have taken a pair of shears,
and lopped off a branch. What has been pruned, has been pruned.
For what it's worth, I'm getting over 25k playouts per second in Java
on my 4-core 3GHz machine using Orego.
Single easiest improvement: use the -server command line option to
Java. This turns on the just-in-time compiler, roughly doubling speed.
Peter Drake
http://www.lclark.edu/~drake/
I don't believe this is a truly workable model. It's often stated as a
fundamental working model (especially for language advocates of tcl,
ruby, python, etc.) but in practice I have found it difficult at best.
At least if your are looking for a high performance program. It's a
nice way to get
I will try to do my best. :)
Selection algorithm in MC is the part you want
improve. If you do that in Python, it will be slow.
Also, its the part of your code that will be more
prune to memory leaks, and errors. because of fast
prototyping and changes.
I have found that Java is good enough for
p
We'll be the judges of that nice&elegant bit ;)
I think using the ease of python to get started with algorithms and then
later pushing the performance critical sections to C and wrapping with SWIG
is a great idea.
On 5/25/07, Eduardo Sabbatella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No, but soon I will pu
No, but soon I will publish to the public a Java Go
engine including a nice and elegant set of go base
classes.
--- George Dahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Does anyone know of any open source Go AI's written
> in pure python?
>
> Thanks,
> George
> > _
20 matches
Mail list logo
