Awesome! Tysvm for replying and posting the link.
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 4:26 AM, Robert Jasiek wrote:
> On 10.09.2015 10:29, Jim O'Flaherty wrote:
>
>> Perhaps you could give some more concrete examples of what you have done
>> already; i.e. where you have moved from the messy human
>> linguis
> I have problems to access the KGS server. My Firefox 40.0.3
> (under Windows 8.1) is even not allowing me to visit the website
> www.gokgs.com.
> Argument: "Diffie-Hellman key is too weak"
Here is how to have Firefox not be so fussy:
http://letusexplain.blogspot.co.uk/2015/08/solved-server-has
This has already been reported. We don't expect it to be fixed any time
soon.
It only happens if you try to use https access; http access is unaffected.
Two workarounds are possible. The easy one is to use an old or inferior
browser,
which does not care about the weakness of a 512-bit key. A m
Try disabling https everywhere extension and accessing the unsecure site
at http://www.gokgs.com/
but yes, it would be better if they fixed this
On 2015-09-10 5:31, "Ingo Althöfer" wrote:
Hello,
I have problems to access the KGS server. My Firefox 40.0.3
(under Windows 8.1) is even not allowi
Hello,
I have problems to access the KGS server. My Firefox 40.0.3
(under Windows 8.1) is even not allowing me to visit the website
www.gokgs.com.
Argument: "Diffie-Hellman key is too weak"
Does someone here know which person at KGS would be the right
one to inform about this problem?
Thanks in
On 10.09.2015 10:29, Jim O'Flaherty wrote:
Perhaps you could give some more concrete examples of what you have done
already; i.e. where you have moved from the messy human
linguistic/cognitive "principles" to something much more formal?
In my principles (or other theory), the degree of ambuigit
I'm very much looking forward to your sharing your progress with us.
Perhaps you could give some more concrete examples of what you have done
already; i.e. where you have moved from the messy human
linguistic/cognitive "principles" to something much more formal?
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 2:23 AM, Ro
On 10.09.2015 08:24, David Fotland wrote:
I would say rather, that expert systems are dead in Go because many smart and
talented people, including professional experts, worked diligently for two
decades on this approach and none were able to get stronger than about 5 kyu.
This is a strong exp
