AlphaGo won first game against Ke Jie.
(;GM[1]SZ[19]
PB[Ke Jie]
PW[AlphaGo]
DT[2017-05-23]RE[W+0.5]KM[7.5]RU[Chinese]
;B[qd];W[pp];B[cc];W[cp];B[nc];W[fp];B[qq];W[pq];B[qp];W[qn]
;B[qo];W[po];B[rn];W[qr];B[rr];W[rm];B[pr];W[or];B[pn];W[qm]
;B[qs];W[on];B[dj];W[nk];B[ph];W[ch];B[cf];W[eh];B[ci];W[
Congratulations, Aja and David! Very remarkable win!
Pasky,
It's too early to conclude any, I think, because no records
of losing games have been published, ie., no weakpoints of
AlphaGo are open. I believe that the essential problems which
come from current MCTS (bottom-up) framework, such
In my opinion, the thing that programs do worst is ko.
Lee did not play any kos, except one minor irrelevant
one in the lower left. This game was so simple that
the program could accurately model the whole board.
If Lee wants to win, he needs to start 2 or 3
simultaneous kos.
Michael Wing
Congr
Hi!
I think the technique of hashing move pairs from the search tree and
reuse them in
the playouts if the context matches, could plausibly be the major
improvement of Alphago that
we witnessed today.
Another thing I noticed is that Alphago does not use any statistics from
the playouts other
To me the most surprising fact in this success is that Reinforce can be
applied on such a huge neural net.
That's a huge number of parameters for a reinforcement learning algorithm -
ok it's with a great computational power,
still I would not have guessed that reinforce could be applied on somethin
Hi!
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 04:43:23PM +0900, Hiroshi Yamashita wrote:
> AlphaGo won 1st game against Lee Sedol!
Well, I have to eat my past words - of course, there are still four
games to go, but the first round does not look like a lucky win at all!
Huge congratulations to the AlphaGo t
You may also want to check out AGA's commentary by Andrew Jackson and
Myungwan Kim. They don't run out of magnetic stones.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZPKR7HzM_s
On 09/03/2016 16:13, Richard Lorentz wrote:
> I found Michael Redmond's commentary very good. Helped a weak player
> like me under
I found Michael Redmond's commentary very good. Helped a weak player
like me understand what was going on, but occasionally went over my
head, which I'm sure others appreciated. He came across as a class act.
His partner, on the other hand, (I forget his name) was more of a
hindrance to the pr
roshi Yamashita
- Original Message -
From: ""Ingo Althöfer"" <3-hirn-ver...@gmx.de>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2016 7:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Computer-go] AlphaGo won first game!
Congrats to the AlphaGo team also from me!
Von: "David Fotland"
Many Fac
This comment should be very good, it was done by a 9 dan pro, the top rank
in go.
2016-03-09 9:27 GMT+01:00 Sergey Nikolenko :
> Everybody here probably knows it, but just in case -- there's a
> commented broadcast uploaded here:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFr3K2DORc8
> I don't play well
Congrats to Aja and alphago team
2016-03-09 8:43 GMT+01:00 Hiroshi Yamashita :
> AlphaGo won 1st game against Lee Sedol!
>
> Hiroshi Yamashita
>
> ___
> Computer-go mailing list
> Computer-go@computer-go.org
> http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/com
Congratulations to AlphaGo people!
Are there strong humans who have an opinion, on whether this advantage at
move 26
is real ?
In pro games, does it happen often that there is a clear advantage at move
26 ?
--
=
"I will never sign a doc
Wow - didn't expect that. Congratulations to the AlphaGo team!
Ingo wrote:
> Similar with CrazyStone. After move 26 CS gave 56 % for AlphaGo
> and never went below this value. Soon later it were 60+ %, and
> never went lower, too.
Did it show jumps at some of the key moves the human experts thoug
Congrats to the AlphaGo team also from me!
Von: "David Fotland"
> Many Faces thought alpha go was ahead most of the game.
Similar with CrazyStone. After move 26 CS gave 56 % for AlphaGo
and never went below this value. Soon later it were 60+ %, and
never went lower, too.
Ingo.
_
] On
> Behalf Of
> > Jim O'Flaherty
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 11:50 PM
> > To: computer-go@computer-go.org
> > Subject: Re: [Computer-go] AlphaGo won first game!
> >
> >
> >
> > Congratulations, AlphaGo and team. And by resignation!
o:computer-go-boun...@computer-go.org] On Behalf Of
> Jim O'Flaherty
> Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 11:50 PM
> To: computer-go@computer-go.org
> Subject: Re: [Computer-go] AlphaGo won first game!
>
>
>
> Congratulations, AlphaGo and team. And by resignation! That's f
100 people.
David
From: Computer-go [mailto:computer-go-boun...@computer-go.org] On Behalf Of Jim
O'Flaherty
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 11:50 PM
To: computer-go@computer-go.org
Subject: Re: [Computer-go] AlphaGo won first game!
Congratulations, AlphaGo and team. And by resign
The amount of points AlphaGo was ahead is also meaningless because it
started playing slow moves when it got ahead. After the big fights were
finished it already knew it was going to win easily.
On 2016-03-08 23:55, Marc Landgraf wrote:
It was pointed out by Lee Sedol after the game and Kim My
Everybody here probably knows it, but just in case -- there's a
commented broadcast uploaded here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFr3K2DORc8
I don't play well enough to understand how good the commentary is, though.
With best regards,
Sergey Nikolenko.
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Marc Land
Wow, congrats to the AlphaGo team! Would love to see a more detailed
analysis later today.
On Mar 9, 2016 9:55 AM, "Marc Landgraf" wrote:
> It was pointed out by Lee Sedol after the game and Kim Myungwan during
> the game, that Q5 should have been better at R4. I would say this was
> the final st
It was pointed out by Lee Sedol after the game and Kim Myungwan during
the game, that Q5 should have been better at R4. I would say this was
the final stage of the middle game. The result from the game left Lee
Sedol with an unwinnable endgame. And "by resignation" is meaningless
here. It is just a
Congratulations, AlphaGo and team. And by resignation! That's fantastic!
Anyone know where the tipping point was? Did Sedol get the end game order
just slightly off and AlphaGo took advantage? Or was their an earlier poor
move by Sedol and/or surprising (and good) move by AlphaGo? I'm WAY too
weak
wow .. congrats to the AlphaGo team!!
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 11:43 PM, Hiroshi Yamashita wrote:
> AlphaGo won 1st game against Lee Sedol!
>
> Hiroshi Yamashita
>
> ___
> Computer-go mailing list
> Computer-go@computer-go.org
> http://computer-go.org/ma
It's true, saw it with my own eyes.
On Mar 8, 2016, at 11:43 PM, Hiroshi Yamashita wrote:
> AlphaGo won 1st game against Lee Sedol!
>
> Hiroshi Yamashita
>
> ___
> Computer-go mailing list
> Computer-go@computer-go.org
> http://computer-go.org/mailman
sgf
(;GM[1]SZ[19]
PB[Lee Sedol]
PW[AlphaGo]
RE[W+R]
KM[7.5]DT[2016-03-09]TM[7200]RU[Chinese]
;B[qd];W[dd];B[pq];W[dp];B[fc];W[cf];B[ql];W[od];B[ld];W[qc]
;B[rc];W[pc];B[re];W[of];B[pg];W[og];B[ph];W[id];B[lf];W[oh]
;B[pi];W[lh];B[kh];W[ke];B[le];W[lg];B[kg];W[kf];B[ne];W[oe]
;B[jc];W[ic];B[jd];W[
AlphaGo won 1st game against Lee Sedol!
Hiroshi Yamashita
___
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@computer-go.org
http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
26 matches
Mail list logo
