Re: [Computer-go] AlphaGo won the second game!

2016-03-10 Thread Olivier Teytaud
The most surprising fact, to me, is that it's possible to apply "reinforce" on such a large scale. Reinforce is not new, but even with millions of cores I did not expect this to be possible. I would have assumed that reinforce would just produce random noise when applied at such a scale :-) On

Re: [Computer-go] AlphaGo won the second game!

2016-03-10 Thread Josef Moudrik
Yes, but they are not some random cherry picking third party; have a look on the top authors of the paper - David Silver, Aja Huang, Chris Maddison.. Regards, Josef Dne čt 10. 3. 2016 19:47 uživatel Lukas van de Wiel < lukas.drinkt.t...@gmail.com> napsal: > The same here, with other people

Re: [Computer-go] AlphaGo won the second game!

2016-03-10 Thread Lukas van de Wiel
The same here, with other people having built the foundations of go AIs, and going from neural networks to MCTS, and now back-ish again... But that is how is how science works. Eventually these two wins are the reward of decades of culminated work by many people working on go AI. AlphaGo is the

Re: [Computer-go] AlphaGo won the second game!

2016-03-10 Thread Marco Scheurer
Congratulations indeed. Although I must admit I have mixed feelings about this, that it is Google, using enormous resources, that got there first. marco > On 10 Mar 2016, at 19:38, Lukas van de Wiel > wrote: > > Congratz to AlphaGo, once more! > This is

Re: [Computer-go] AlphaGo won the second game!

2016-03-10 Thread Lukas van de Wiel
Congratz to AlphaGo, once more! This is getting scary! :-) Lukas On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 12:40 AM, "Ingo Althöfer" <3-hirn-ver...@gmx.de> wrote: > Hello, > > > Von: "Erik van der Werf" > > Very impressive results so far! > > indeed, almost unbelievable. > > > > If

Re: [Computer-go] AlphaGo won the second game!

2016-03-10 Thread Ingo Althöfer
Hello,   Von: "Erik van der Werf" > Very impressive results so far!   indeed, almost unbelievable. > If it's going to be a clean sweep, I hope we will get to see some handicap > games :-) I have another proposal, IF a clean sweep will happen: There was an

Re: [Computer-go] AlphaGo won the second game!

2016-03-10 Thread Erik van der Werf
Very impressive results so far! If it's going to be a clean sweep, I hope we will get to see some handicap games :-) Erik On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Petr Baudis wrote: > In the press conference (https://youtu.be/l-GsfyVCBu0?t=5h40m00s), Lee > Sedol said that while he saw

Re: [Computer-go] AlphaGo won the second game!

2016-03-10 Thread Petr Baudis
In the press conference (https://youtu.be/l-GsfyVCBu0?t=5h40m00s), Lee Sedol said that while he saw some questionable moves by AlphaGo in the first game, he feels that the second game was a near-perfect play by AlphaGo and he did not feel ahead at any point of the game. On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at

Re: [Computer-go] AlphaGo won the second game!

2016-03-10 Thread Petri Pitkanen
This time I think game was tougher. Though too weak to judge. At the end sacrifice a fistfull stones does puzzle me, but again way too weak to analyze it. It seem Lee Sedol is lucky if he wins a game 2016-03-10 12:39 GMT+02:00 Petr Baudis : > On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 09:05:48PM

[Computer-go] AlphaGo won the second game!

2016-03-10 Thread Petr Baudis
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 09:05:48PM -0800, David Fotland wrote: > I predicted Sedol would be shocked. I'm still routing for Sedol. From > Scientific American interview... > > Schaeffer and Fotland still predict Sedol will win the match. “I think the > pro will win,” Fotland says, “But I think