>The recent pwn2own contest proved that mac or windows could be easily hacked
>within hours so perhaps you should do your ad hominem attacks against both
>os x and windows.
It is starting to look like the contest winner used Flash accessed via
the Safari web browser to win the prize. So strictly
It's not apple's fault...they did it!!
Mike
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Tom Piwowar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >The recent pwn2own contest proved that mac or windows could be easily
> hacked
> >within hours so perhaps you should do your ad hominem attacks against
> both
> >os x and windo
I've been following this thread for the last couple days, but only
received the original post today (4/18/08). Why would be?
Steve
Steve Rigby wrote:
In a move that's sure to get the attention of Apple's lawyers, one
company has started advertising a new $400 hackintosh dubbed the
"OpenMa
BTW you got a link for this since at the time of the contest they weren't
releasing any info on the security hole except that 'Apple was going to work
on a patch' ?
Mike
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Tom Piwowar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >The recent pwn2own contest proved that mac or wind
I'm hoping somebody like Dell just happens to put out a Leopard
friendly machine. Let the hobbyists talk it up for it's Mac friendly
ways and see if it improves sales.
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 5:42 PM, Steve Rigby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 16, 2008, at 10:23 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since the insides of an Apple machine are mostly COTS stuff anyway,
and run Windows really, really well in most press reports, it would
seem logical that Dell or some other player would wrap a case around
those parts and let it loose in the world. I suppose the problem is
that because Appl
More than that I think it is something similar to the way the
original IBM checked the BIOS (Apple calls it something different)
that does not allow Leopard to run on a Dell.
Dell does have higher end machines. They bought Alienware a couple
of years ago.
Stewart
At 03:38 PM 4/18/2008, you
It's called EFI. It's the new interface between the OS and hardware. It's
supported in one way or another by most OS vendors. Reading about it I'm
not sure it's a step ahead as much as a sidestep. Seems like one more thing
that can get corrupted since it sits on the HD.
OS X will run on legacy
Any body out there still using a standalone usenet news reader? Any
recommendations? I had been using free agent 1.1, but it is a bit
old, so I was wondering what I was missing. Cheap=good, free=better.
I don't really like the web interfaces available for reading them on-line.
Thanks,
Arthur
When I had a provider that actually provided this service I used xnews. It
was handy with binaries, I didn't do a lot of just reading. For that you
might look at mozilla Thunderbird, I find that to be a small fast usenet/RSS
client. I've never really used it for email. I like it's interface for
I thought newsgroups has gone away.
silly me!
mike wrote:
When I had a provider that actually provided this service I used xnews. It
was handy with binaries, I didn't do a lot of just reading. For that you
might look at mozilla Thunderbird, I find that to be a small fast usenet/RSS
client. I'
I noticed that Apple has just released an update of Safari. I assumed
that this was the patch.
mike wrote:
BTW you got a link for this since at the time of the contest they weren't
releasing any info on the security hole except that 'Apple was going to work
on a patch' ?
Mike
On Fri, Apr 18
Nothing else even comes close to Agent (the paid version, not Free Agent).
It's not very expensive.
*
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy **
** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at
On Apr 18, 2008, at 4:38 PM, Matthew Taylor wrote:
Since the insides of an Apple machine are mostly COTS stuff anyway,
and run Windows really, really well in most press reports, it would
seem logical that Dell or some other player would wrap a case
around those parts and let it loose in the
That's why I was wondering where Tom got his info since the exploit was
unreleased to the public.
MIke
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Stephen Brownfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I noticed that Apple has just released an update of Safari. I assumed
> that this was the patch.
>
>
>
> mike w
>I've been following this thread for the last couple days, but only
>received the original post today (4/18/08). Why would be?
It might be interesting to peruse that email's headers.
*
** List info, subscription managemen
>BTW you got a link for this since at the time of the contest they weren't
>releasing any info on the security hole except that 'Apple was going to work
>on a patch' ?
This is based on my own analysis, which is available to only the
privileged few. I hope you feel suitably honored.
So you just guessed that it was Flash based on nothing even though every
website says Apple is working on the patch? Not exactly Columbo are ya?
Mike
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Tom Piwowar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >BTW you got a link for this since at the time of the contest they were
TRACFONE: I recently purchased a year's service with several hundred minutes
for $65 on Ebay.
_
Use video conversation to talk face-to-face with Windows Live Messenger.
http://www.windowslive.com/messenger/connect_your_way.html?ocid=
Agent had newer versions and for about two dollars a month thet
connect you with the newsgroup.
Marcio
At 06:01 PM 4/18/2008, you wrote:
Any body out there still using a standalone usenet news reader? Any
recommendations? I had been using free agent 1.1, but it is a bit
old, so I was wonderin
>So you just guessed that it was Flash based on nothing even though every
>website says Apple is working on the patch? Not exactly Columbo are ya?
I get paid to make such guesses.
What do people pay you to do?
*
** List
Apple patches adobe products? I would have never guessed.
Mike
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Tom Piwowar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >So you just guessed that it was Flash based on nothing even though every
> >website says Apple is working on the patch? Not exactly Columbo are ya?
>
> I ge
I'll throw my two cents in for Agent. I also use their newsfeeds.
I really hate the ones that open lots of individual windows.
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 7:18 PM, Marcio V. Pinheiro
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agent had newer versions and for about two dollars a month thet connect you
> with the n
>They're owned by Tracfone, and yes, they're still around. Phone/plan
>choice depends on how much you will use the phone. Net10 is 10 cents a
>minute, so is T-Mobile. Net10 and Tracfone minutes expire after 60-90
>days; T-Mobile 1000 minute card expires in 365 days. There's lots of
>prepaid cho
24 matches
Mail list logo
