Intuitive is just another word for, in with the new, same as the old.
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Fred Holmes wrote:
> At 05:14 PM 3/25/2009, Chris Dunford wrote:
> >Do you have any data to confirm that the "public" thinks this,
> particularly
> >of Office, which is what we're talking about
Yes I have a password to open the program. All it has are the dates of
appointments for new and old patientes and it works very well. I have all other
informations about patients in Word and Excell also with password.
Marcio
-Original Message-
>From: db
>Sent: Mar 25, 2009 3:59 PM
>To:
I don;t think it is a DOS program, I used it with Windows 98 and ME.
Marcio
-Original Message-
>From: Rich Schinnell
>Sent: Mar 25, 2009 5:09 PM
>To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
>Subject: Re: [CGUYS] What a pain... Sad.
>
>Marcio, If it is a dos program maybe the file is in some kind
At 05:14 PM 3/25/2009, Chris Dunford wrote:
>Do you have any data to confirm that the "public" thinks this, particularly
>of Office, which is what we're talking about?
I'm always leery of any opinions ascribed to the "public." I'll bet the sample
is always very small and is not representative o
> I can't say I have ever heard anyone who prefers MS's latest offerings
> over their earlier ones other than the security aspects.Many
> people put up with them ... but that's about it.
OK, so what you have is from your own experience only, and exclusively with
people who used older versi
You mention consensus and profits as a measure of failure...or soon to be
failure of office 2007. I'm wondering when this will start since it's now
2009 and office sales are up over previous versions? I use google docs
myself as I don't need a full office suite so I have no horse in this race.
Most of the organizations I have relations with ( University of
Washington, Law offices, Design firms, etc ) either don't want to
upgrade from Office 2003 or having upgraded, turned around and
downgraded if they are allowed to. Although I live in Seattle, I live
or work in the real world ..
> MS is consistent in it's mediocrity and the public's opinion
> is also notably consistent. Office 07, Vista, Explorer.
> Needlessly confusing, bloated, slow...
Do you have any data to confirm that the "public" thinks this, particularly
of Office, which is what we're talking about?
Thanks a lot David,
Master Key does look like just what I am looking for.
db
David K Watson wrote:
I can tell you what NOT to use, and that's any old versions of
the Mavis Beacon Teaches Typing. I tried it a few years ago
for my son, and that version was plainly ported from the Windows
versio
I can tell you what NOT to use, and that's any old versions of
the Mavis Beacon Teaches Typing. I tried it a few years ago
for my son, and that version was plainly ported from the Windows
version by people who didn't have any idea how OS X works.
It required admin authorization to install and onc
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 3:54 PM, mike wrote:
> I know from an interview I heard with one of the developers on MS office
> that almost all the features MS would get requests for were already in the
> product. One of the reasons for developing the ribbon was to increase the
> chances of users gett
Marcio, If it is a dos program maybe the file is in some kind of
format that can be exported or brought into some other newer
program. I see your using windows XP home edition. You might want
to try changing some of the options for the program to see if that
helps. I am assuming that it is D
Step back a get a little perspective.
If it walks like a duck, smells like a duck and quacks like a duck ...
it's a DUCK !
MS is consistent in it's mediocrity and the public's opinion is also
notably consistent. Office 07, Vista, Explorer. Needlessly confusing,
bloated, slow...
Think ab
I know from an interview I heard with one of the developers on MS office
that almost all the features MS would get requests for were already in the
product. One of the reasons for developing the ribbon was to increase the
chances of users getting more out of office. Those here notwithstanding,
mo
The demise of Appleworks is to me inexplicable. It's difficult to
imagine that even if the application required a complete rewrite to
be an ongoing product that it would have been significantly more
costly or less profitable than the resources that went into Pages and
Numbers. I still use App
At some point you are probably going to have to migrate your client
database to another program.
Unfortunately, databases grow continuously and live longer usable
lifespans than DB programs so your problem is one of the chief concerns
and problems for professionals.
You should check on the
Thanks to all of you. Yes, I have been using it for more than 10 years. The
problem is what program can I use instead of it? I am a psychiatrist and I have
all my appointments in this program. It has served me quite well. Someone
suggested Palm, the other said for me to "google what I want". I a
5 came out ten years ago...good guess.
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Snyder, Mark - IdM (IS) <
mark.sny...@ngc.com> wrote:
> Marcio,
>
> It appears that version 5 is old; version 6.1 was released to be
> compatible with windows 2000 and XP (see
> http://www-01.ibm.com/software/lotus/products/
Betty you are so right.
When I was first into computers a new company started marketing a
Bible for the computer. Called it Quick Verse.
Company had integrity and sold a good product. When Windows came out
helped you upgrade your program to a Windows version, and then
improved and sold a n
Marcio,
It appears that version 5 is old; version 6.1 was released to be
compatible with windows 2000 and XP (see
http://www-01.ibm.com/software/lotus/products/organizer). So, I would
guess that version 5 is somewhere around 10 years old. If you can
replace it with another suite of programs, you
>What MS forgot, was we spent years learning how to use their Word
>Processor and were quite happy with it. We did not ask them to
>change the menu system on it.
They also forgot that they once had a very good word processor that was
very logical and easy to use. They have steadily crapped it
> Frequently it told me "You have insufficient internal
> resources. Save your file and close Organizer". Yes, I
> still use Lotus Organizer 5 for my appointments.
This really sounds like a bug in Organizer more than any real lack of resources
in your PC. Might be time to find something new. The
Marcio I think it is a problem with the program and not computers.
I am not sure how old Lotus Organizer 5 is, but it may have internal
limitations that you are running up against.
Stewart
At 09:25 AM 3/25/2009, you wrote:
See, now I have this brand new Computer that I put together (with
the
See, now I have this brand new Computer that I put together (with the help of
the shop). Gygabyre MB. Dua Core Pentium, 4 giga memory... working fine.
Windows Home...
In my old Compaq that served me for fifteen years, I had around 980 mb
memory... Frequently it told me " You have insufficient i
24 matches
Mail list logo
