Ayvitraya
-- George
-Original Message-
From: Karl Wright [mailto:daddy...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 5:29 PM
To: connectors-dev
Subject: [VOTE] Select a name to possibly replace Apache Connectors
Framework
Folks,
Grant feels we would have a better chance of
Reminder: six hours to go. (Jack, I still haven't seen your vote...)
Karl
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 5:53 AM, George Aroush geo...@aroush.net wrote:
Ayvitraya
-- George
-Original Message-
From: Karl Wright [mailto:daddy...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 5:29 PM
To:
1.ManifoldCF
2.Connex
-Mark
On 9/28/10 4:44 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
My votes:
Connex
Connie
Contango
Contour
Manicon
Multicon
Ralph
Repositor
(In alpha order, no preference implied.)
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Karl Wright
Jack, can you put these in order of preference? If you don't, I
suppose I can give each of your votes 36/8 points, or 4.5.
Karl
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Jack Krupansky
jack.krupan...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
My votes:
Connex
Connie
Contango
Contour
Manicon
Multicon
Ralph
Hey, turns out it didn't even matter ;-)
Karl
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Jack Krupansky
jack.krupan...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
Oops, sorry, I didn't realize priority was included. Here they are:
Connex
Contango
Repositor
Connie
Contour
Manicon
Multicon
Ralph
-- Jack
Vote +1 if you want to rename Apache Connectors Framework to Connex,
-1 if you want to keep Connectors Framework as the Apache name.
This voting opportunity will expire at the end of the working day on
Friday, EDT.
Karl
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 17:58 -0400, Karl Wright wrote:
Vote +1 if you want to rename Apache Connectors Framework to Connex,
-1 if you want to keep Connectors Framework as the Apache name.
This voting opportunity will expire at the end of the working day on
Friday, EDT.
This is good so far,
The names were supposed to have been vetted by those submitting them?
That was part of the submission rules.
Ok, let me go do some research on Connex myself...
Karl
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Jack Krupansky
jack.krupan...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
+1 to rename
So, (assuming the vote
It looks like there is a service mark HMS Connex. That's probably
not a problem. BUT:
ConneX is a pure p2p collaboration platform based on JXTA
technologie. Open source, and available for download from
SourceForge. For me, that pretty much nixes use of the name.
Let me recalculate the totals
With Jack's preference order specified, these are the numbers:
Connex, 36
ManifoldCF, 23
Manicon, 19
Maniplex, 16
Contango, 12
Ayvitraya, 11
Contour, 10
Manilink, 10
Connie, 10
Ralph, 9
Recon, 7
Repositor, 6
Multicon, 3
Conton, 3
Karl
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Karl Wright
So, my official vote is -1. The name shouldn't have been a candidate
from the start.
Karl
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
It looks like there is a service mark HMS Connex. That's probably
not a problem. BUT:
ConneX is a pure p2p collaboration
Vote +1 to rename Apache Connectors Framework to Apache ManifoldCF.
Vote -1 to keep the project name of Connectors Framework, or to retain
Connex, if that wins its vote.
This vote also expires end of day on Friday.
Note: Manifold is a trademark for a GIS software product. However,
I agree with
hmmm...I think I'm all voted out. Can we just call it nothing?
On 9/28/10 6:40 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
Vote +1 to rename Apache Connectors Framework to Apache ManifoldCF.
Vote -1 to keep the project name of Connectors Framework, or to retain
Connex, if that wins its vote.
This vote also
Jack,
That's one of the main purposes of having everyone list choices by
priority. If one doesn't work, there are others you can use.
I don't want to open that vote again unless the community decides that
the list of candidate names was simply not rich enough to furnish a
good choice.
Karl
Fair enough. I could live with any of the other choices, but having this
CF suffix really messes a lot of stuff up and is less practical than any
of the other names. Basically, it means we may end up having to use MCF as
the shorthand name.
Wait... stop the presses... I just realized that
You are correct about the rules. I added that name back in when we
replaced the original vote for it with the name gathering exercise and
then a vote, and I did not make it clear what I was doing. But then
we still have to hold a vote on ManifoldCF, since that vote was
aborted, and Grant did
Karl, you are the de facto naming czar. You get to take the community input
and figure out how to interpret it so that it so that it reflects a
general sense of the spirit of the community.
So, now you get to rule on my objections to ManifoldCF! And the chips can
fall where they may.
--
On 9/28/10 7:10 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
Fair enough. I could live with any of the other choices, but having this
CF suffix really messes a lot of stuff up and is less practical than
any of the other names. Basically, it means we may end up having to use
MCF as the shorthand name.
Wait...
Ok, I just want an up-or-down vote on ManifoldCF at this point. +1 from me.
Karl
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/28/10 7:10 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
Fair enough. I could live with any of the other choices, but having this
CF suffix really
-1 for me. Standing alone it's an okay name, but trying to actually use it
is a pain (and we might as well call it MCF). But I'll certainly go along
with the majority.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday,
If this is adopted, I'm thinking we could use it in the following ways:
Abbreviation: MCF
Short name: ManifoldCF
Qualified short name: Apache ManifoldCF
Fully qualified and unabbreviated name: the Apache Manifold
Connectors Framework
I'm not quite sure what the world will think of that last
Actually, an abbreviation of AMCF is not bad either kinda like
that myself. But I'm still not sure I like any of the book title
choices I've offered myself here.
Do we dare use Manifold Connectors Framework in Action? and
describe AMCF as Manifold Connectors Framework at times?
Karl
On
That is roughly the usage I would expect. As far as a book title, tough
call. There is the length issue. If somebody already knows of ManifoldCF,
Apache ManifoldCF in Action makes sense, but Apache Manifold Connectors
Framework in Action is a bit more descriptive.
Bottom line, a name with
23 matches
Mail list logo
