Le 06/03/2013 16:32, Daniel Wagner a écrit :
Hi Tomasz,
On 03/06/2013 02:11 PM, Tomasz Bursztyka wrote:
The orignal code assumes that the builtin chain is empty which is
obviously always the right assumption :).
That is actually the bug in the original code: it might not be empty. If
it is, i
Hi Tomasz,
On 03/06/2013 02:11 PM, Tomasz Bursztyka wrote:
The orignal code assumes that the builtin chain is empty which is
obviously always the right assumption :).
That is actually the bug in the original code: it might not be empty. If
it is, it does the right change, if not it modifies th
Hi Daniel,
The orignal code assumes that the builtin chain is empty which is
obviously always the right assumption :).
That is actually the bug in the original code: it might not be empty. If
it is, it does the right change, if not it modifies the 1 rule in the chain.
Tomasz
_
Hi Tomasz and Patrik
On 03/06/2013 12:44 PM, Tomasz Bursztyka wrote:
Hi Daniel and Patrik,
On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 12:04 +0100, Daniel Wagner wrote:
The policy of a chain is the last element not the first one.
Isn't the default policy is applicable only for a builtin chain and is a
property of
Hi Daniel and Patrik,
On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 12:04 +0100, Daniel Wagner wrote:
The policy of a chain is the last element not the first one.
Isn't the default policy is applicable only for a builtin chain and is a
property of the table itself??
This patch does not make sense: there is no polic
On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 12:04 +0100, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> The policy of a chain is the last element not the first one.
Isn't the default policy is applicable only for a builtin chain and is a
property of the table itself??
Cheers,
Patrik
___
c
From: Daniel Wagner
The policy of a chain is the last element not the first one.
---
src/iptables.c | 11 ---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/iptables.c b/src/iptables.c
index 086b8bf..aaf51e8 100644
--- a/src/iptables.c
+++ b/src/iptables.c
@@ -1077,7 +
