[Callers] Re: Short contra lines

2022-10-25 Thread John Sweeney via Contra Callers
Kent http://www.modernjive.com for Modern Jive DVDs From: Jeff Kaufman via Contra Callers Sent: 25 October 2022 13:19 To: Mary Collins Cc: Contra Callers Subject: [Callers] Re: Short contra lines Like Chris, I'm also confused about how this helps with l

[Callers] Re: Short contra lines

2022-10-25 Thread Jeff Kaufman via Contra Callers
Like Chris, I'm also confused about how this helps with low dancer numbers. I also don't see how 4x4 or 3x3 help, since if you only have enough people for a single line those formations mean more people are out? Jeff On Tue, Oct 25, 2022, 7:01 AM Mary Collins via Contra Callers < contracallers@li

[Callers] Re: Short contra lines

2022-10-25 Thread Mary Collins via Contra Callers
I think maybe a comment I made may have added to this. When I said I'd use dbl prog it was specifically in relation to low dancer #'s and using 4 face 4 or 3 face 3. Not contra lines. Rarely would I use a dbl prog unless I have longer lines and doing contras. On Tue, Oct 25, 2022, 2:39 AM Chris Pa

[Callers] Re: Short contra lines

2022-10-24 Thread Chris Page via Contra Callers
I'm dubious about using double progression in short lines. If there's an odd number of couples in the line: In a single progression dance, there's always one couple out, alternating between the top and the bottom of the line. In a double progression dance, there's always one couple out at the bott

[Callers] Re: Short contra lines

2022-10-24 Thread Jonathan Sivier via Contra Callers
ailto:contracall...@sharedweight.net>> *Subject:* [Callers] Re: Short contra lines Is there a list of easy double-progression dances that the group can recommend? On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 07:42 Mary Collins via Contra Callers mailto:contracallers@lists.sharedweight.n

[Callers] Re: Short contra lines

2022-10-24 Thread Casey Carr via Contra Callers
a New Century >> >> (available now) >> >> >> >> From: Victor Gascon via Contra Callers >> >> Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2022 9:30 AM >> To: Mary Collins >> Cc: Contra Callers >> Subject: [Callers] Re: Short contra lines

[Callers] Re: Short contra lines

2022-10-24 Thread Rich Sbardella via Contra Callers
ight.net> > *Sent:* Saturday, October 22, 2022 9:30 AM > *To:* Mary Collins > *Cc:* Contra Callers > *Subject:* [Callers] Re: Short contra lines > > > > Is there a list of easy double-progression dances that the group can > recommend? > > > > On Sat, Oct 2

[Callers] Re: Short contra lines

2022-10-22 Thread David Harding via Contra Callers
Mary Collins *Cc:* Contra Callers *Subject:* [Callers] Re: Short contra lines Is there a list of easy double-progression dances that the group can recommend? On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 07:42 Mary Collins via Contra Callers wrote: I always carry an assortment of 3

[Callers] Re: Short contra lines

2022-10-22 Thread Laur via Contra Callers
(available now)   From: Victor Gascon via Contra Callers Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2022 9:30 AM To: Mary Collins Cc: Contra Callers Subject: [Callers] Re: Short contra lines   Is there a list of easy double-progression dances that the group can recommend?   On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 07:42

[Callers] Re: Short contra lines

2022-10-22 Thread steve Pike via Contra Callers
Shorter lines provides the opportunity to pull out some of those “old but modern” great active/inactive dances, and both couples will have a chance to dance the 1s and 2s roles the whole length of the set without the dance lasting an unbearably long time. Some of my favorites are Scouthouse Reel

[Callers] Re: Short contra lines

2022-10-22 Thread Jonathan Sivier via Contra Callers
On 10/22/2022 8:30 AM, Victor Gascon via Contra Callers wrote: Is there a list of easy double-progression dances that the group can recommend? Here's a great one that I use often. Awesome Double Progression Dance Donna Calhoun-McAllister duple improper, double progression; beginner 1 - do

[Callers] Re: Short contra lines

2022-10-22 Thread Tony Parkes via Contra Callers
Parkes Billerica, Mass. www.hands4.com<http://www.hands4.com/> New book! Square Dance Calling: An Old Art for a New Century (available now) From: Victor Gascon via Contra Callers Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2022 9:30 AM To: Mary Collins Cc: Contra Callers Subject: [Callers] Re: Short

[Callers] Re: Short contra lines

2022-10-22 Thread Victor Gascon via Contra Callers
Is there a list of easy double-progression dances that the group can recommend? On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 07:42 Mary Collins via Contra Callers < contracallers@lists.sharedweight.net> wrote: > I always carry an assortment of 3 face 3 and 4 face 4 since my home dance > may range from 6 - 30 dancers.

[Callers] Re: Short contra lines

2022-10-22 Thread Mary Collins via Contra Callers
I always carry an assortment of 3 face 3 and 4 face 4 since my home dance may range from 6 - 30 dancers. Sometimes a move such as right hand high, left hand low presents a challenge for some of my dancers so I adjust on the fly. And may do a double progression so no one is ever out. Mary On Sat

[Callers] Re: Short contra lines

2022-10-22 Thread John Sweeney via Contra Callers
Hi Laurie, Last time I had that challenge in America, as well as some contras, I called: Ted's Triplet #3 Waltz Country Dance Big Set (Birdie in the Cage, California Show Basket, Down the Coal Mine) Square --- NOT! Microchasmic Hexitation Check out the 101 fo

[Callers] Re: Short contra lines

2022-10-21 Thread Colin Hume via Contra Callers
On Sat, 22 Oct 2022 05:25:13 + (UTC), Laur via Contra Callers wrote: > Do you have best selections or considerations for 20 to 16 peoples for > intermediate experience dancers or > secondarily less experienced dancers > > My immediate question is for more experienced dancers, because this is

[Callers] Re: Short contra lines

2022-10-21 Thread Don Veino via Contra Callers
With smaller groups definitely consider screening compositions for significant end effects - dancers will encounter them a greater proportion of time than in longer lines/bigger crowds. -Don On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 1:25 AM Laur via Contra Callers < contracallers@lists.sharedweight.net> wrote: >