https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759
Product: urpmi
Component: urpmi
Summary: urpmi should not consider unrelated unresolved
dependencies
Version: 4.2-4mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status:
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 13:26, rcc wrote:
regardless of the question - which seems valid to me - why don't you
just repackage SuperFoo and remove its dependency on IBM-JDK?
I can definitely do this. What I am wanting to do is keep urpmi from
doing unnecessary things. If there is no good reason
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is anyone else experiencing the double looking fonts with kmail? The folder
list on mine displays the bold fonts with double vision appearance, don't
know if it started with KDE updates or X or
- --
Jason Straight
ICQ: 1796276
PGP:
Le Mercredi 8 Janvier 2003 22:53, Jason Straight a écrit :
Is anyone else experiencing the double looking fonts with kmail? The folder
list on mine displays the bold fonts with double vision appearance, don't
know if it started with KDE updates or X or
I dont have this in kmail but look
After installing fontconfig-2.1-2mdk, gnome2 programs (e.g. gedit,
gconf-editor) refuse to start:
$ gedit
No fonts found; this probably means that the fontconfig
library is not correctly configured. You may need to
edit the fonts.conf configuration file. More information
about fontconfig can be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Fox wrote on Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 03:49:33PM -0600 :
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 13:26, rcc wrote:
regardless of the question - which seems valid to me - why don't you
just repackage SuperFoo and remove its dependency on IBM-JDK?
I can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 08 January 2003 05:05 pm, Pascal wrote:
Le Mercredi 8 Janvier 2003 22:53, Jason Straight a écrit :
Is anyone else experiencing the double looking fonts with kmail? The
folder list on mine displays the bold fonts with double vision
Hi
I've experienced several problems with Drakx in the past.
Now (as per today) it got to the point that I cannot use the graphical install
anymore.
So I figured it's time for an overview of problems I encountered... :-)
My system:
DELL dimension XPS D233
Pentium 2, 233
STB 3D graphics,
Michael Reinsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-g: doesn't work, apmd says: /usr/sbin/apmd: invalid option -- g
thanks will fix that.
BTW: Did you notice https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746 ?
sounds good fix, i was planning to fix a bunch of stuff there (nobody
touched this thing
Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ifconfig eth1 hw ether 11:11:11:11:11 (example address)
would you try as ipv4 please ?
Steve Fox wrote:
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 12:32, Bryan Whitehead wrote:
In the real world, sysadmins just find a solution (like redoing the crap
ass RPM someone made) and move on with life. If you don't like
dependancy checking, then don't use urpmi. Use the plain rpm command.
Write your own
Hi!
On 07 Jan 2003 20:34:18 +0100
Chmouel Boudjnah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Name: apmd
Version : 3.1.0
would be great if people got test that, since i don't have a laptop
apm ready handy (apm -g stuff also).
Works for me :)
Did some tests with -g, though my notebook doesn't
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
the Aironet wireless card drivers for the 4800/340/350 2.4Ghz wireless cards
does'nt work properly in the mandrake kernel.
when I run iwconfig i get the following
Device eth1 has been compiled with version 0
of Wireless Extension, while we are using version 13.
Some things may be broken...
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 18:12, Frederic Crozat wrote:
URL : http://www.gnome.rgo/
Is .rgo a new TLD? :)
--
Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760
Product: guarddog
Component: guarddog
Summary: guarddog does not like LANGUAGE French (and others?)
Version: 2.0.0-2mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=394
Product: drakxtools
Component: program
Summary: encrypted filesystems only allow passwords larger than
19 characters
Version: 1.1.9-53mdk
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On January 8, 2003 00:00 am, Jean-Michel Dault wrote:
[Contrib-RPM]
-
Installation failed:
file /etc/php.ini from install of php-ini-4.3.0-1mdk conflicts
with file from package php-common-4.2.3-3mdk
- --
I'm assuming that
Tried to update to latest X version and latest kde but no luck whatsoever.
video is all messed up and freezing.
console mode is working but not X.
Bernard
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 16:47, Todd Lyons wrote:
I can see the scenario that you want to deal with, but is it easier to
just add one line to your skip.list or to rewrite key portions of the
urpmi script(s) and lib to do it? All or none are always easier than
some, especially when the
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 17:34, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
sounds good fix, i was planning to fix a bunch of stuff there (nobody
touched this thing since i left this year) but i can't find any apm
laptop, anyway thanks and i will commit the patch.
I have installed apmd/apm-scripts and it seems to
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
error messages when trying to load X:
SAVAGE(0): failed to fetch any BIOS Modes. Disabling BIOS.
this was not there on previous versions. (my last update from cooker was early
December)
Bernard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Tried to update to latest X version and latest kde but no luck
On Wednesday 08 January 2003 06:53 pm, Bryan Whitehead honored me with this
communique:
Steve Fox wrote:
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 12:32, Bryan Whitehead wrote:
In the real world, sysadmins just find a solution (like redoing the crap
ass RPM someone made) and move on with life. If you don't like
the name urpmi does sound stupid, like somebody belching. why do linux programmers
give
their software such silly names? guess they dont have sales or packaging departments
Quoting Jay DeKing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wednesday 08 January 2003 06:53 pm, Bryan Whitehead honored me with this
On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 01:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the name urpmi does sound stupid, like somebody belching. why do
linux programmers give their software such silly names? guess they
dont have sales or packaging departments
Because it's fewer keystrokes! :)
GNOME 2.0 went and renamed
hmm. must be from the days when you had to enter special codes for each key stroke.
Quoting Steve Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 01:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the name urpmi does sound stupid, like somebody belching. why do
linux programmers give their software such silly
Am Mittwoch, 8. Januar 2003, 17:53:06 Uhr MET, schrieb Frej Rasmussen:
Even though the change log states that XFS filesystem is merged upstream
there's absolutely no trace of it :/, even in the kernel-source package.
Same here, I couldn't boot from my xfs / with 2.4.21.pre2.1mdk.
--
Götz
On Wednesday 08 January 2003 05:51 pm, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ifconfig eth1 hw ether 11:11:11:11:11 (example address)
would you try as ipv4 please ?
I do and did. In that instance I was trying to spoof and or change the MAC
address of the card, which works
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Phil Lavigna wrote:
Hi,
As previously reported, yesterday's upgrade to the latest packages killed X
on this TiBook, so I performed a clean installation today to see if it would
result in a better outcome (nope). But I noticed something strange. The first
two
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Christian Walther wrote:
I wonder - am I the only one to have problems with the new BenH kernel based
installer (see my post of Dec 27)? Or am I just the only one who has tried
it?
I missed that post altogether, just reviewed it in the archives. There is
no shell in
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Jeroen Diederen wrote:
Stew Benedict wrote:
Haven't seen this one come through either since the glibc changeover.
For now:
http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~sbenedict/cooker-ppc/xmms-1.2.7-16.1mdk.ppc.rpm
and the other bits are there too
Stew Benedict
I
Hi Stew,
BTW- Stew, since X works fine during the installer, is there anyway I can
have a functional desktop after the install? Or should I just wait until
it gets fixed in Cooker? Thanks.
Did you catch my message about manually turning off dri in XF86Config-4?
I've seen other ati users
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Christian Walther wrote:
I wonder - am I the only one to have problems with the new BenH kernel based
installer (see my post of Dec 27)? Or am I just the only one who has tried
it?
-Christian
My bad on this one. I had devfs enabled. New kernel is at:
101 - 134 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
