https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1362
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status|NEW
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1603
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
On Friday 14 February 2003 01:17, Pedro Soria-Rodriguez wrote:
Hello, I am using a MDK 9.0 system that I have been updating with
cooker RPMs since I installed 9.0.
No, you do not update your 9.0 system with cooker. Instead, it is called
'screwing your system'.
cooker rpms were never made for
Danny Tholen wrote:
On Friday 14 February 2003 01:17, Pedro Soria-Rodriguez wrote:
Hello, I am using a MDK 9.0 system that I have been updating with
cooker RPMs since I installed 9.0.
No, you do not update your 9.0 system with cooker. Instead, it is called
'screwing your system'.
cooker
fredagen den 14 februari 2003 19.50 skrev Mandrakesoft packages database:
apache 2 replaces apache 1
These packages has been moved from cooker contrib to cooker main:
[snip]
- apache2-2.0.44-4mdk.i586
[snip]
Finally!
Yihaa!, ride on!
(something for the mandrake-whatever-* site?)
Here's
On Friday 14 February 2003 3:09 pm, Lea Gris wrote:
*snip*
Ok, but ...
How man is supposed to upgrade to 9.1 when it is out if it was not a
fully tested process ?
Aren't we supposed to test cooker and report bugs ?
I think the upgrade process is *a very important feature* that *should*
On Friday 14 February 2003 3:11 pm, Oden Eriksson wrote:
fredagen den 14 februari 2003 19.50 skrev Mandrakesoft packages database:
*snip*
stucked), but not I, I just kept going like a duracell bunny... I refused
*snip*
Not to nit-pick here, but isn't the bunny an Energizer bunny? heh
Btw.. Nice
Jean-Michel Dault [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Each group could have a separate mailing list. This way, I wouldn't have
30,000 e-mails in one folder. It would be much easier to find stuff we
have to handle (in my case apache/php) from stuff I don't really care
about (I don't use gnome, except to
Todd Lyons wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I originally sent this to an internal list, but then I realized
contribs were probably handled by others. These need to be fixed.
Blue skies... Todd
This is a bug in rpm (rpm-build to be exact). find.requires is the
problem,
Le Vendredi 14 Février 2003 21:01, Warly a écrit :
Michael Scherer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have take a look at the groups classification of some package with
rpmdrake, and I have seen there is a big lack of consistency.
To give a simple example :
Should wmnetload be in the
On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 01:16, Chuck Burns wrote:
On Friday 14 February 2003 3:09 pm, Lea Gris wrote:
*snip*
Ok, but ...
How man is supposed to upgrade to 9.1 when it is out if it was not a
fully tested process ?
Aren't we supposed to test cooker and report bugs ?
I think the
Chuck Burns wrote:
You do a FULL upgrade to cooker, making sure that ALL packages are cooker
packages..
Ok I do fully agree with this. Saying only FULL upgrade is «supported»
or partial upgrade can lead to unpredictable results.
--
Léa Gris
() Campagne du ruban texte brut contre les
On Friday 14 February 2003 01:24 pm, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Jean-Michel Dault [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Each group could have a separate mailing list. This way, I wouldn't have
30,000 e-mails in one folder. It would be much easier to find stuff we
have to handle (in my case apache/php)
On 14 Feb 2003, James Sparenberg wrote:
On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 01:16, Chuck Burns wrote:
Which begs the question. Is cooker an extension of the previous distro
or is it a distro in and of itself. The former IMHO is the preferable
situation and I might add the more profitable alternative.
James Sparenberg wrote:
On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 01:16, Chuck Burns wrote:
On Friday 14 February 2003 3:09 pm, Lea Gris wrote:
*snip*
Ok, but ...
How man is supposed to upgrade to 9.1 when it is out if it was not a
fully tested process ?
Aren't we supposed to test cooker
At least on my Latitude laptop (neomagic)
I had to replace
GtkRC=/usr/share/themes/Galaxy/gtk/gtkrc
back by
GtkRC=/usr/share/themes/Default/gtk/gtkrc
in /etc/X11/gdm/gdm.conf
I don't know if this is relevant, but the X settings are:
Driver neomagic
VideoRam2048
DefaultColorDepth 16
On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 21:15, Frederic Crozat wrote:
--=-=-=
Name: gabber Relocations: (not relocateable)
Version : 0.8.7.12 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
Release : 0.20020214.1mdk Build Date: Fri Feb 14 21:09:13 2003
Fred,
On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 21:41, James Sparenberg wrote:
Which begs the question. Is cooker an extension of the previous distro
or is it a distro in and of itself. The former IMHO is the preferable
situation and I might add the more profitable alternative. The latter
yields more problems and
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 10:24:30PM +0100, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Why don't you use filters and scoring? With that, I don't have
trouble handling my bugs and the bugs on stuff I work on, or
related to my work. And bugzilla by email is very fast and
efficient. I don't have any problem
This time Brook Humphrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
becomes daring and writes:
On Friday 14 February 2003 01:24 pm, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Jean-Michel Dault [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Each group could have a separate mailing list. This way, I wouldn't have
30,000 e-mails in one folder. It
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Ben Reser wrote:
I was using the mail interface but it took hours for Bugzilla to pickup
my comment/changes etc. So the web interface is faster for me...
The mail interface has normally been pretty fast for me, since I normally
have had to go back to it and reset the
Ben Reser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was using the mail interface but it took hours for Bugzilla to pickup
my comment/changes etc. So the web interface is faster for me...
There's a cron job run every 20 minutes that flushes the mails.
Warly told that it could be made faster if necessary
Already fixed in gdm-2.4.1.3-3mdk ;)
Thanks
=o=
kk1
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1652
Product: mandrake-release
Component: packaging
Summary: Displays Chinese as squares during installation
Version: 9.1-0.1mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-14 23:34 ---
It's still there. I downloaded KDE 3.1 from a Cooker mirror on 13 Feb 2003, and
in Konqueror it behaves like it is in single click mode when you are using Tree
View,
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653
Product: drakxtools
Component: DrakConnect
Summary: Too many popup windows
Version: 9.1-0.29mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-15 00:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=179)
-- (https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=179action=view)
Beta3 Bug report
Bug report created during install of Mandrake 9.1
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1654
Product: kernel
Component: packaging
Summary: error when using EXT2 or EXT3 and LABEL= in fstab
Version: 2.4.21-0.pre4.6mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1654
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-15 01:39 ---
suggested solution
--- /sbin/mkinitrd 2003-02-14 19:35:12.0 -0500
+++ /tmp/mkinitrd 2003-02-14 19:34:58.0 -0500
@@ -406,6 +406,15 @@
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1417
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-15 01:41
---
Created an attachment (id=180)
-- (https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=180action=view)
Fix illegal memory access in mysql_check.c
Oh, of course, I tried
(1) I use my own build of xemacs and I have xemacs in the skip.list.
rpmdrake does not show xemacs in its list of upgradable files - so at
least rpmdrake does skip displaying xemacs, but it goes and tries to
install xemacs anyway.
(2) Also rpm is segfaulting so rpmdrake now does nothing
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 12:17:23AM +0100, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
There's a cron job run every 20 minutes that flushes the mails.
Warly told that it could be made faster if necessary (when I
asked him), I thought to myself, and then I concluded that it was
not really necessary to have a
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655
Product: k3b
Component: k3b
Summary: k3b fails on second startup in i18n enviroment
Version: 0.8-2mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1656
Product: Installation
Component: hardware
Summary: Mandrake 9.1 beta 3 may not correctly read Mitsumi CD
ROM drives
Version: 1.781
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1657
Product: XFree86
Component: XFree86
Summary: XFree86 localization kills gnome apps in simplified
Chinese
Version: 4.3-0.20030210.1mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=115
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-15 05:54 ---
Try with pre4.6:
the computer boots well without any options but no network.
with noapic acpi=off it boots correctly but crashes after the network launch
(ifup eth0)
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 14:37:39 -0600, Steve Fox wrote:
On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 10:47, Frederic Crozat wrote:
Description : Mandrake Linux Galaxy theme
Hi Frederic, I hope you're not fearing this too much :)
It looks good over all, however it crashed gnome-theme-manager the first
time I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I originally sent this to an internal list, but then I realized
contribs were probably handled by others. These need to be fixed.
Blue skies... Todd
- - Forwarded message from Todd Lyons [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Fri, 14
Likewise here with a cooker system as of now (2003/02/14 20:30). Opened up
an OOo Impress presentation and it works. Reporter, please tell result of
cat ~/.sversionrc. Possibly rm -rf ~/.openoffice ~/.sversionrc
~/.user60.rdb
I come from the BSD world and the process there is very very different.
So my question is more to understand than to critique. So understanding
the attitude if you will surrounding the process is important.
James
On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 14:27, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2003-02-14 at
On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 07:00, Thomas Backlund wrote:
Viestissä Perjantai 14. Helmikuuta 2003 16:35, James Sparenberg kirjoitti:
question,
Is MDK trying to eliminate apm, replacing it with acpi? The rpm
suspend scripts makes it impossible for me suspend my laptop. The
latest kernels
Gongrats Great timing as well. We have (my company) recently
uncovered a number of bugs with php and apache 2 on RH so I look forward
to your stuff working. I'll be grabbing and installing tonight.(or
maybe in the am) Simple enough need on our part. Check boxes that
allow you to check more
Richard,
In order to test what you say I tried what you are doing with msec
(yes I know the risks but on this box msec makes doing what I have to do
for testing and development impossible.) I knew that drakxtools had an
update so I wanted to see what would happen.
What happened is that
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658
Product: xmms
Component: xmms
Summary: Segmentation fault
Version: 1.2.7-16mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority:
Seems to work well I test it yesterday...
Thx for the CPU_FREQ support
now I can run my Titanium a 1ghz with this command.
echo -n 0%75%100%performance /proc/cpufreq
Serge Blondin
Stew Benedict wrote:
New kernel:
101 - 147 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
