On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 21:41, James Sparenberg wrote: > Which begs the question. Is cooker an extension of the previous distro > or is it a distro in and of itself. The former IMHO is the preferable > situation and I might add the more profitable alternative. The latter > yields more problems and more disgruntled users. (I'm having the same > argument at work BTW.)
Erroneous question. You have to look at things the other way around. How is Mandrake developed? With a "live" development version - that is, a development version of the distribution to which new packages are uploaded as the developer finishes them. This is Cooker. How is Mandrake released? By freezing Cooker at a certain point, calling it Mandrake X.X, and releasing it. You're looking at things backwards. -- adamw
