On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 09:16, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
drakgw: internet connection sharing
- clean up tools embeddeding in the mcc
o make it hard to freeze the mcc
o make tools loo better when embedded (no embedded wait messages,
...)
why don't we just get rid of mcc
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 22:00, Ben Reser wrote:
'hey guys give Laurent the time to finish his program and make noise
after'
I think the whole thing is laughable. Mandrake whines about not having
enough money to support their developers. But then goes and redevelopes
the proverbial wheel.
I know this was brought up before as to if we really need this
screen...and I am not sure that we do...but if we are going to keep it I
have a suggestion:
instead of listing them like cups, proftp, ..., etc I think it would
be more useful to actually list them and give a brief description of
what
From FootNotes (www.gnomedesktop.org) and OSNews:
The GNOME Foundation has entered into an agreement with Bitstream who
will donate ten high quality fonts to be used with free software (KDE,
XFree86, Gnome as well as others). This means distributions can finally
ship free desktops/applications
It's not the just the fonts, it's MCC in general that's very unresponsive.
Even enabling the log window undrneath shows nought.
The only way to check is a glance at cpu and/or mem activity=:o(
MCC needs a lot more polishing, imho.
HarM
This is something that is going to need
rpmdrake/urpmi already verifies the gpg signature, so what else do you
want?
I think he's talking about the system installer...not the package
installer, which also checks for sig's. During the install the first
(or at least one of the first) steps asks if you want to verify your
install
I think the treeview and the wizard could work together quite nicely,
afterall it's just a form that has a basic set of operations: choose the
programs to install - wait for them to download/copy - (check the gpg
keys) - install them - return to the beginning.
rpmdrake is not what should
I agree too, and why does it have to warn me twice in a row (two differnt
popup windows that are almost identical) warning me about gpg or other
things?
what was wrong with the old rpminstaller
http://www.phatvibez.net/images/mdk8_1/rpminst_progress.jpg
something like this again I think would
I wanted to point out to everyone the OSNews review here
http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=1954
harshly true and to the point...
You can either import the key...
or rpmdrake -no-verify-rpm
yes, i realize this...and that is what I do, but that's not the point
-Brad
I in no way meant to cause a flame war by posting the link
to that review.
Do I agree with everything she says, of course not, but she does make
*some* good points.
Why did I post it:
(1)
to let you know the review was out there, regardless of your personal
opinion of Eugenia OSNews is a
Here is what I initially posted on mandrakeforum but I wanted to know
what others thought of this idea...
part of the problem is that there are too many places users are reporting
bugs (cooker, expert, forum, alt.os.linux.mandrake, and many others)
I was going to suggest creating a fool-proof
I have grown to love the new RPMDrake, at first I was a little unsure, but
after using it for a while I think it has promise.
You can view the files of an rpm by right clicking on the information window
and selecting Maximum information
I agree it would probably be better to have a tab on the
14 matches
Mail list logo
