You trampled Stefan's fix.
Warly wrote:
> Name: mkcd Relocations: (not relocateable)
> Version : 3.7.0 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
> Release : 1mdk Build Date: Tue Nov 18 10:20:42 2003
> -=-=-=-
> Warly <[EMAIL P
The same thing is happening with rsync and a bunch of files in contrib.
Quel Qun wrote:
> I'll be the loud mouth. Please fix the mirror problems. fmirror is
> always downloading the same files.
uld I file it as a bug? Or is there some simple trick I don't
know about?
David
P.S. kbuildsycoca is complaining when it's run:
kbuildsycoca: Recreating ksycoca file (/var/tmp/kdecache-david/ksycoca,
version 70)
kbuildsycoca: VFolderMenu::mergeFile: /etc/xdg/menus/mdk-configure-kde.
You trampled Gwenole's fixes...
Laurent Culioli wrote:
> Name: gaim Relocations: (not relocateable)
> Version : 0.72 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
> Release : 1mdk Build Date: Wed Nov 5 11:14:37 2003
>
> -=-=-=-
You just trampled on Vincent's fixes...
Luca Berra wrote:
> Name: nss_ldap Relocations: (not relocateable)
> Version : 211 Vendor: Luca Berra <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]>
> Release : 3mdk Build Date: Sat Nov 1 13
Austin wrote:
Okay, I know everyone has been itching for a really bad song, written in
ten minutes, and recorded in less than twenty, about the new kernel, so
here it is:
http://groundstate.ca/twopointsix.ogg
Bravo ... encore ...
--
David Coe
With the opening of Cooker I've seen this with at least one other package too, we need
to be careful not to trample changes that have been made since 9.2 was first cut.
Laurent MONTEL wrote:
> -=-=-=-
> Name: kdeedu Relocations: (not relocateable)
> Version : 3.1
We should use 2.6 if it's stable. Right now, it can't handle low memory situations to
save its life.
"Andrey Borzenkov" wrote:
> Just hit the following on a.o.l.m:
>
> 8.2 was one of the most rock-solid Linux distros ever. Unless you feel
> you need some program or functionality you can't get
failure to restart unless XUL.mfasl was deleted. My
feeling is it's something different, but I'll keep it in mind.
Anyway, so far so good with --with-pthreads (but I don't understand it).
David
are done by others in the community. They run very
nice.
Yes, and come out very quickly.
David
That sounds like you're dispensing with xft and/or using Mozilla's own
binaries. Fortunately (like OO.o) installation is very easy :-).
David
Buchan Milne wrote:
David, do you get the same problem when you use CTRL-2 or
Window->Mail&Newsgroups ?
The same problem which ever way is used to launch Mail.
BTW, on my cooker box (which has been running 1.5-0.92mdk for a week), I
start mozilla with the mail component first, and usua
Frederic Crozat wrote:
On Mon, 03 Nov 2003 08:34:50 +, David Coe wrote:
I mentioned in an earlier thread that I was having problems with the
Mozilla-1.5-0.92mdk placed in the MandrakeClub archive, in particular,
that pressing the Mail icon on the Browser Status Bar (down at the
bottom left
That was khttpd, and it didn't suck, it just wasn't being maintained in 2.5.
Diego Iastrubni wrote:
> if i am not mistaking, it was removed in 2.6 since it sux ass so much.
>
> why would you need that? http in user mode is good enough.
>
> ?, 2 ??? 2003, 18:03, ?? ??? Oden Erik
Is the new list going to be available through gmane (I know you don't control this) ?
Warly wrote:
>
> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/twiki/bin/view/Main/MailingListHowTo
>
ould
you give the addition a whirl next time you rebuild (for mandrakeclub or
cooker). Perhaps the list can comment if the bad bits pop up elsewhere!
On a minor issue, I did notice that the mozilla-irc rpm doesn't put a
Mozilla Chat item in the menu. Is this deliberate?
Many thanks good people!
David
uot; "vesa"
It would try the non-free driver first, then the 2D one, and fall back to vesa
if neither are available.
Obviously this would require a patch to X...
David Sansome
David Coe wrote:
Buchan Milne wrote:
David Coe wrote:
Emmanuel Moll wrote:
I'm using chrips' from http://norlug.org/~chipster/index.pxml?rpms
Manu
I have noticed the norlug mozilla-1.5-1 bombs reliably on 9.2 when mail
is called from the browser status bar. I'd better le
Buchan Milne wrote:
David Coe wrote:
Emmanuel Moll wrote:
I'm using chrips' from http://norlug.org/~chipster/index.pxml?rpms
Manu
I have noticed the norlug mozilla-1.5-1 bombs reliably on 9.2 when mail
is called from the browser status bar. I'd better let chipster know :-).
Wo
Emmanuel Moll wrote:
I'm using chrips' from http://norlug.org/~chipster/index.pxml?rpms
Manu
I have noticed the norlug mozilla-1.5-1 bombs reliably on 9.2 when mail
is called from the browser status bar. I'd better let chipster know :-).
And now you can add these to the (contrib) list:
OpenGroupware.org-1.0-2mdk.noarch.rpm
OpenGroupware.org-1.0-5mdk.noarch.rpm
David Walser wrote:
> There are some packages that have more than one
> version sitting on the mirrors right now:
>
> in contrib:
> bugzilla-2.16.3-
Juan Quintela wrote:
>> "marc" == Marc Guise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> marc> I read the post about Mdk 9.2 and LG on mandrakeusers.org. I have cd-rw drive,
> marc> model HL-DT-ST GCE 8400b and I have Mdk 9.2rc2 running. There are no problems
> marc> with my LG drive
>
> 21mdk just upd
There are some packages that have more than one
version sitting on the mirrors right now:
in contrib:
bugzilla-2.16.3-4mdk.noarch.rpm
bugzilla-2.16.3-5mdk.noarch.rpm
PHP-nuke-6.0-4mdk.noarch.rpm
PHP-nuke-6.9-1mdk.noarch.rpm
horde-2.2.4-1mdk.noarch.rpm
horde2-2.2.3-2mdk.noarch.rpm
in main:
draksyn
Vincent Meyer, MD wrote:
> Since KDE is broken, am temporarily using ICEWM. At the bottom of the screen
> is the menu button, Terminal button, and Mozilla button. Terminal button
> doesn't bring up a terminal window, although there is some disk activity.
>
> V.
What does your xvt alternative
Brad Felmey wrote:
On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 20:03, Galileo wrote:
Another proof that Mandrake releases unfinished products.
http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/advisories/advisory.php?name=MDKA-2003:020
More that 250 MB of updates excluding SRPMS. How the hell did this
happen ?
It looks like x.2 doesn't
Can't we just set a simple standard to TEST YOUR PACKAGES before uploading
them. It seems that simple things are constantly ignored by those who
maintain the cooker RPMS. How hard would it be to test your rpms on a
recently installed cooker box before uploading them? This would allow
people to
Can't we just set a simple standard to TEST YOUR PACKAGES before uploading
them. It seems that simple things are constantly ignored by those who
maintain the cooker RPMS. How hard would it be to test your rpms on a
recently installed cooker box before uploading them? This would allow
people to
Mike wrote:
> The main things that I find bad about gimp (just my opinion, maybe im
> mad/doing it wrong)
> [...]
> 3) In photoshop, if you need the zoom tool, you just press 'Z' crop is
> another one key shortcut. In gimp the same operation involves several
> clicks to cycle through each window (
corresponding lib files. You couldn't put them up and/or the spec file?
Best wishes
David
Robert L Martin wrote:
> On Sunday 19 October 2003 12:23 pm, Götz Waschk wrote:
>> Who's more important, the stupid windows convert, or the developer? If
>> you remove emacs from the CD, you'll scare of the developers. No
>> developers means no new software. BTW it's not emacs that is growing
>> a
Brook Humphrey wrote:
> On Sunday 19 October 2003 01:29 am, David Walser wrote:
>> Brook Humphrey wrote:
>> >> Ouch. What's taking so much space?
>> >
>> > stupid emacs and xemacs and all the assorted packages. No real users use
>> > these
>
guran wrote:
This is from a mail on expert,
http://archives.mandrakelinux.com/expert/2003-10/msg01537.php
When I look at Slackware 9.1 and /etc/X11/XF86Config I have:
...
# This loads the GLX module
Load "glx"
# This loads the DRI module
Load "dri"
Why do Mdk have DRI ex
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6165
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6165
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-19-10 18:36 ---
My system is a 9.1 updated to cooker three weeks ago and to 9.2 this week.
To reproduce the bug:
1) Add some files.
2) Select All in Artist and All in Albums. Select a
Brook Humphrey wrote:
>> Ouch. What's taking so much space?
>
> stupid emacs and xemacs and all the assorted packages. No real users use these
Well you can't not have emacs, but I agree we could ditch xemacs. The only reason for
ever having it was syntax highlighting in the nice GUI, and regul
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6165
Product: rhythmbox
Component: rhythmbox
Summary: Freeze when adding after delete all
Product: rhythmbox
Version: 0.5.3-1mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONF
Brook Humphrey wrote:
> On Thursday 16 October 2003 08:37 am, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
>> Ron Stodden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Oddly, installing all the 9.2 updates solved all problems
>> > (although there is no apparent reason why in the explains of the
>> > RPMs involved).
>>
>> There
I am having some trouble with my dell poweredge 1600sc. I have a megaraid
controller in it. After installing mandrake 9.1 and mandrake 9.2 I have
periodic lock-ups. After using the 2.6 test kernel all seems to be well.
For some reason it seems that the default 9.x kernels use the old v1
megarai
I agree that would be nice, but that would require MDK to re-hire the guy that made
the Demo section, which would require money...
Robert Fox wrote:
> Congratulations on the official release of 9.2 - the best distro
> available to date!
>
> Could someone please eventually update the demo site fr
Olivier Thauvin wrote:
> Le Lundi 13 Octobre 2003 11:08, David Walser a écrit :
>> Olivier Thauvin wrote:
>> >> The main problem is that I never really know if I am really in sync.
>> >> Please no advice about rsync or timefuzz.
>> >
>> > Learn h
Olivier Thauvin wrote:
>> The main problem is that I never really know if I am really in sync.
>> Please no advice about rsync or timefuzz.
>
> Learn how to use rsync:
Why? rsync is confusing and hard to learn. Part of the problem is that every person
that posts and example use uses different
Luca Berra wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 04:54:07PM +0200, Luca Berra wrote:
>>hi,
>>today i found two packages that provide half of perl.
>>
>>psad-1.2.3-1mdl from contrib and
>>wml-2.0.9 from MAIN <
>
> A fix for this kind of problems could be having perl autoprovides
> generated onl
Jason M. Randle wrote:
> HAHA JOHN ALLEN YOU THINK?? NOW YOU GET A COOKIE
>
> John Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On Tuesday 30 September 2003 04:12, Jason M.
> Randle wrote:
>>> TYPCIAL ASSHOLES!
>>>
>
>> Yes you are aren't you.
> --
> "The thing about the
Marcel Pol wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 06:07:50 -0400
> David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Laurent Montel wrote:
>> >> And splitting a single application (kopete and others) into 3-4 seperate
>> >> rpms just doesnt make sense.
>> >
Laurent Montel wrote:
>> And splitting a single application (kopete and others) into 3-4 seperate
>> rpms just doesnt make sense.
>
> Why ?
> Do you know libification ?
Is it necessary when nothing besides that single app is ever going to use the library?
Vox wrote:
> Tho, since we are talking about the mailing listscould we
> *please* get rid of sympa and start using mailman or any other
> *decent* mailing list software? Sympa has proved over and over and
> over again that it can't deal with the mandrake mailing lists and
> that it sh
Warly wrote:
> It may be a good idea, before cooker opens again, to take these days to
> have some brainstorm.
>
> May you give your opinion on :
>
> - What was wrong in 9.2 development process?
the mirror situation, of course
Also, a lot of MDK developers got heavy into bugfixing the last coup
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> lamikr_mdk wrote:
>> > That helped.
>> > Do you know is there similar kind of environment variables for selecting
>> > appropriate version of aclocal and automake?
>>
lamikr_mdk wrote:
> That helped.
> Do you know is there similar kind of environment variables for selecting
> appropriate version of aclocal and automake?
Well, for example, to compile giFT, I have to do this:
WANT_AUTOCONF_2_5=1 AUTOMAKE=automake-1.7 AUTOHEADER=autoheader-2.5x
ACLOCAL=aclocal-
Oden Eriksson wrote:
> tisdagen den 23 september 2003 12.21 skrev David Walser:
>> Oden Eriksson wrote:
>> > "BIND 9.2.3rc4 is now available.
>> > [...]
>> > 1509. [bug] Hint zones should accept delegation-only.
>> &
Emmanuel wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/packages/openoffice/stable/1.1rc5/
>
> Any chance of getting a quick compilation and making it into 9.2??? I
> believe rc5 will be renamed 1.1 once it's propagated onto the mirrors
> (based on the fact that SO7 is already out).
>
>
Oden Eriksson wrote:
> "BIND 9.2.3rc4 is now available.
> [...]
> 1509. [bug] Hint zones should accept delegation-only. Forward
> zone should not accept delegation-only.
>
> 1508. [bug] Don't apply delegation-only checks to answers f
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 20:52, Felix Miata wrote:
>
>> Yes, I got that answer from irc://freenode/mandrake after someone there
>> read my post here. It fixed it. But, it begs the question, why would the
>> rpm db be corrupted on a week old install?
>
> One thing I've notic
Pierre Jarillon wrote:
> Le Dimanche 21 Septembre 2003 16:41, David Walser a écrit :
>> http://rhl.redhat.com/
>>
>> From reading this, it sounds like the possibility of some cooperation
>> between Cooker and the new RHL project is even more possible.
>
> RedHat
http://rhl.redhat.com/
>From reading this, it sounds like the possibility of some cooperation between Cooker
>and the new RHL project is even more possible.
One possible goal could be making packages source compatible. Differences in macros
should be easy to smooth out, and the menu system sho
John Keller wrote:
> David Walser wrote:
>> Buchan Milne wrote:
>> > Vincent Meyer, MD wrote:
>> >
>> >> Also, the server's built, the line is in, and would be nice to get
> this
>> >> server up and available for use of fellow cooker
Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> Ainsi parlait [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
>> > I plead for some sanity, please put the menu entry back in. Let the user
>> > that doesn't want a terminal remove the entry (it would give them an
>> > excuse to learn menudrake), and don't make the 99.99% of us who do want
>> > it h
Hi Vincent, I don't want to bother you too long, I just would like clarification on
one point:
Vincent Danen wrote:
> Right. Mandrake Linux 9.2 is not a specialized "server" product. It's a
> desktop product. It has 18mos life. The 2 years is for MNF, SNF, etc.
> Corporate Server has 3 years.
So is the URL still correct, or no?
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> Name: xmms-artsRelocations: (not relocateable)
> Version : 0.6.0 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
> Release : 1mdk Build Date: Sat Sep 13 22:24:36 2003
> -
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-16-09 14:42 ---
It's still valid. The bug is still there.
--
Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
Austin wrote:
> On 09/15/2003 08:48:50 PM, David Walser wrote:
>> Yes, please people, use the rpmsync package that's in contrib. People are
>> still grabbing cooksync off my webserver because the link is still in the
>> wiki. It should be referring to the rpmsync pa
Buchan Milne wrote:
> Vincent Meyer, MD wrote:
>
>> Also, the server's built, the line is in, and would be nice to get this
>> server up and available for use of fellow cookers here in North
> America. If
>> a graphic tool like Draksync won't do it, does anyone have a favorite
>> mirroring s
It's been a long hot summer!
Olivier Thauvin wrote:
> Le Vendredi 12 Septembre 2003 12:07, Thierry Vignaud a écrit :
>> Han Boetes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Name: sgrotum Relocations: (not
>> > relocateable) Version : 1.2.6 Vendor:
>> > MandrakeSoft Release
Is anybody else having problems with the combination of XFree86 and the
latest kernel-secure. I can not start x windows with the latest
kernel-secure. Every other kernel works(kernel, kernel-smp,
kernel-enterprise).
Thanks.
andre wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 September 2003 03:48, David Walser wrote:
>> I agree, this is caused by a recent change to kdebase-konsole that makes
>> its xvt alternatives value take precedence over rxvt. I'm not sure I agree
>> with that. I think users should have to
Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> Ainsi parlait Michael Lothian :
>> Everthough of having a file somewhere that has the hostname is? And
>> then referencing everything to that file so if something changes
>> everything us updated with out reconfiguring anything?
> hostname is in /etc/sysconfig/network.
N
Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> Ainsi parlait David Walser :
>> Guillaume Rousse wrote:
>> > Ainsi parlait David Walser :
>> >> Guillaume Rousse wrote:
>> >> > [Contrib-RPM]
>> >> > Name: imp3
Frederic Crozat wrote:
> BTW, could you fix bash-completion so :
>
> gendiff foobar-x.y | bzip2 -c > [TAB] will allow TAB to use ANY (or at
> least .bz2) file for this redirection.
>
> Thanks :)
Well if he's gonna do some more hacking/bugfixing on bash-completion, here's another
one that doesn'
Yes, but this is an issue that's caused by the horde2/imp3 naming, so we should just
get rid of it.
There's going to have to be a rename anyway, when horde3 and imp4 come out, we might
as well make sane and stable names now.
If the newly renamed packages have a provides/obsoletes on the old nam
Udo Rader wrote:
> Am Tue, 09 Sep 2003 13:50:50 + schrieb Buchan Milne:
>> Udo Rader wrote:
>>> hi,
>>>
>>> the last cooker update changed the terminal application used by the
>>> WM-Terminal from xterm to konsole ...
>>>
>>> The deeper reason for this is that xvt is now mapped to konsole per
>
Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> Ainsi parlait David Walser :
>> Guillaume Rousse wrote:
>> > [Contrib-RPM]
>> > Name: imp3 Relocations: (not
>> > relocateable) Version : 3.2.2 Vendor:
Oden Eriksson wrote:
>> Ahh, familiarity breeds contempt? But it does mean less retraining for
>> the Mouse Consultants and Solitaire Experts ;-).
>
> "Mouse Consultants", ha ha ha ha , never heard that one before, really
> funny!
Me neither, it's usually "Minesweeper Consultants and Solitai
Is anybody getting this message after upgrading to the latest kernel?
kernel: MASQUERADE: No route: Rusty's brain broke!
I am using nat/masquerading to share the internet. To enable internet
sharing I must revert back to 2.4.21.
Hope to see this get fixed soon.
But if pam_console makes the locally logged-in user own /dev/rtc and be the only one
able to read and write from it, doesn't your concern become moot?
Juan Quintela wrote:
>> "guillaume" == Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> guillaume> Ainsi parlait Juan Quintela :
>>> > "o
Michael Lothian wrote:
> My uni uses imp
>
> MAy try and plau arrond imp where is this awk btw? I like pretty things
>
> Mike
I had written an awk script that was run when the package was installed. It would fix
your imp configuration to properly reflect your hostname (so when users sent e-mai
Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> I just rewieved the whole horde suite:
> - horde2
> - imp3
> - turba
> - chora
>
> It seems old imp 1 or 2 are no longer around, while there is still old
> horde-nag 1. Could we nuke it, and turn horde2 to horde and imp3 to imp ?
Please do.
Buchan Milne wrote:
>> The OOo team wishes a perfect product. I have the same wish for Mdk 9.2 !
>
> If it were perfect, what would we do after 9.2 release? Close cooker ? ;-)
1) Party
2) Sleep
3) Go everywhere installing MDK 9.2 on every system we can find.
Buchan Milne wrote:
> BTW, if you choose LDAP auth during install, you should now get autofs
> installed, and if you have LDAP automount maps setup well, they should
> work out-the-box (I still need to test this though ...).
>
> Maybe David Walser can comment on some of these a
Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> [Contrib-RPM]
> Name: imp3 Relocations: (not relocateable)
> Version : 3.2.2 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
> Release : 1mdk Build Date: Mon 08 Sep 2003 10:46:41 PM
> CEST
> -=-=-=-
> Guill
Warly wrote:
> Name: mandrake_theme Relocations: (not relocateable)
> Version : 0.0.8 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
> Release : 1mdk Build Date: Tue 09 Sep 2003 01:56:42 AM
> CEST
> -if [ `readlink %mdk_bg/root/default.png`
Olivier Blin wrote:
> Has someone tried to build test4 without any patch and to boot it
> successfully ?
I'm not using the RPM, just the stock code, and it works fine. Compiled with:
gcc version 3.3.1 (Mandrake Linux 9.2 3.3.1-0.7mdk)
Thierry Vignaud wrote:
> David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> > at first, i strongly disagree with dadou violation of the
>> > packaging policy.
>> >
>> > but now i think that dadou thoughs is that we'll quite always
>> >
Thierry Vignaud wrote:
> at first, i strongly disagree with dadou violation of the packaging policy.
>
> but now i think that dadou thoughs is that we'll quite always install
> rxvt since it's required by drakconf, even if user has not asked for
> terminals.
Meanwhile the users that actually *wan
Bryan Whitehead wrote:
> Bryan Whitehead wrote:
>> am-utils is a very much-needed package for Linux to integrate into big
>> "UNIX shops".
>>
>> NASA/JPL (at least in my section) is a big "UNIX Shop". Wiothout
>> am-utils we are pretty screwed... is there a reason this package was
>> removed fr
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> this is overwhelmingly[1] strange. tvignaud will try to have a
> look..
>
> Ref:
> [1] excuse my broken english
I don't see anything wrong with it
Buchan Milne wrote:
> Well, it actually means the package has been libified, to follow the
> distribution policy. Anyway, you will see:
>
> $ rpm -q --whatprovides XFree86-devel
> libxfree86-devel-4.3-20mdk
> $ urpmq -p XFree86-devel
> libxfree86-devel
Well that was the attempt anyway. I'm sure
David Baudens wrote:
> xterm is installed if KDE or GNOME are not installed.
So? xterm != rxvt. Anyway, xterm sucks.
Like someone else said, why don't we remove Koffice and Mozilla's menu entries? Why,
OO.o and Konq are already in the menu! No, that makes no sense. Policy is a
David Baudens wrote:
> I don't understand why people want always install a terminal. Most of users
> don't need it. If you need one, simply choose Consoles tools category when
> you can choose which packages should be installed. And if you need one
> after installation,
On Thursday 04 September 2003 14:11, Frederic Crozat wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 14:09:00 +0200, David Baudens wrote:
> > On Thursday 04 September 2003 13:30, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> >> David Baudens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> > Problem is that a te
> dadou, update rpmsrate so that kdebase-konsole get installed too
It was commited.
--
David Baudens
MandrakeSoft - http://www.mandrakesoft.com
On Thursday 04 September 2003 13:30, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> David Baudens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Problem is that a terminal emulator is not needed for an
> > office/multimedia/internet/ect. workstation. So, if people who install
> > computer don'
andre wrote:
> On Thursday 04 September 2003 02:21, David Baudens wrote:
>> > Why?
>>
>> To not have several terminal emulators in applications menu. Rxvt is
>> always installed (used by MCC) and will be duplicated with other
>> terminals.
> I still don'
> Am Donnerstag, 4. September 2003 02:48 schrieb David Baudens:
>> > Am Donnerstag, 4. September 2003 02:21 schrieb David Baudens:
>> >> > Why?
>> >>
>> >> To not have several terminal emulators in applications menu. Rxvt
>> is always
David Baudens wrote:
>> Why?
>
> To not have several terminal emulators in applications menu. Rxvt is
> always installed (used by MCC) and will be duplicated with other
> terminals.
But they aren't in the applications menu, they're in the Terminals menu.
Why shou
> Am Donnerstag, 4. September 2003 02:21 schrieb David Baudens:
>> > Why?
>>
>> To not have several terminal emulators in applications menu. Rxvt is
>> always installed (used by MCC) and will be duplicated with other
>> terminals.
>
> Thats good :) Howe
> Why?
To not have several terminal emulators in applications menu. Rxvt is
always installed (used by MCC) and will be duplicated with other
terminals.
> David Baudens wrote:
>> -=-=-=-
>> Name: rxvt Relocations: (not
>> relocateab
Why?
David Baudens wrote:
> -=-=-=-
> Name: rxvt Relocations: (not relocateable)
> Version : 2.7.10Vendor: MandrakeSoft
> Release : 3mdk Build Date: Wed Sep 3 21:14:33 2003
> -=-=-=-
Jan Ciger wrote:
> David Walser wrote:
> | David Walser wrote:
> |
> | Hmm, no reports either way (whether the problem does or doesn't
> persist in 0.67).
>
> I found another coredump and crashed gaim today. Unfortunatelly the
> backtrace is useless :
>
&
1 - 100 of 3621 matches
Mail list logo
