[Cooker] File Manager - Super User Mode

2002-11-09 Thread Peter Polman
Neither my work box or my home box have a functional Super User Konqueror. It's been close to two months since I installed Cooker on each one of them and neither has ever worked as they should (kdesu konqueror-wise that is). The work box was a RC2 install and the home PC was an FTP install just

[Cooker] core-utils problems

2002-10-14 Thread Peter Polman
[root@arthur RPMS]# rpm -Uvh coreutils-4.5.2-2mdk.i586.rpm Preparing...### [100%] file /usr/bin/uptime from install of coreutils-4.5.2-2mdk conflicts with file from package procps-2.0.10-2mdk [root@arthur RPMS]# rpm -Uvh coreutils-4.5.2-2mdk

Re: [Cooker] devfsd.conf

2002-09-30 Thread Peter Polman
On Monday 30 Sep 2002 2:04 pm, Biagio Lucini wrote: > On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Now that 9.0 is out ... > > > > Minor spelling corrections in English version. > > > > > > Initialize not initialise > > Minimize not minimise > > Maximize not maximise > > Did you say English or

Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake (and friends) fill /var/tmp

2002-08-20 Thread Peter Polman
On August 20, 2002 09:30 am, John Johnson wrote: > On Tue, 2002-08-20 at 10:53, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > > "J.A. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hi all... > > > > > > rpmdrake fills /var/tmp (or /usr/tmp, in my box are symlinked), with > > > temporary files not removed: > > > > i

Re: [Cooker] b3: serious bug in drakconf

2002-08-16 Thread Peter Polman
On August 16, 2002 05:46 pm, Danny Tholen wrote: > It seems that drakconf is eating _a lot_ of recourses when left running > idle for half an hour or so. I might need to add that in all cases I tested > I had opened rpmdrake from drakconf as well. > > I attached an strace of the process after a fe

Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake issues...

2002-07-24 Thread Peter Polman
On July 24, 2002 04:33 pm, Philippe Coulonges wrote: > Le Mercredi 24 Juillet 2002 22:43, Gary Greene a écrit : > > rpmdrake is broken on my machine. > > > > I can get the list of available packages from the server, then whe I try > > to install the new package, it downloads the packages, an

[Cooker] konsole errors

2002-05-19 Thread Peter Polman
I'm still getting KDEinit could not launch "kconsole-noxft" errors. I've had them for quite some time now. I've edited the /usr/share/applnk/konsole.desktop file and added the needed space between konsole and noxft, but every time update-menus gets run it goes back to konsole-noxft. How or what

Re: [Cooker] Problemas con SCSI

2002-02-23 Thread Peter Polman
On February 23, 2002 07:53 pm, you wrote: > On Sat, 2002-02-23 at 06:29, Hugo wrote: > > Hello friends: > > > > I am trying to install Mandrake 8.1 from the floppy, but it doesn't > > recognize the SCSI: PIONEER CD-ROM DR-U06S > > > > In the same SCSI board: ADAPTER SCSI AHA 150X/1510/152X/AIC-6X

Re: [Cooker] Compupic anyone ?

2002-02-19 Thread Peter Polman
On February 19, 2002 12:26 am, you wrote: > On Tuesday 19 February 2002 01:42 am, you wrote: > > Same results in 16 bit depth as with 32 bit depth. If memory serves it > > was about the time that XFree 4.2 came out that Compupic quit working, so > > it's probably not a Mandrake thing > > No,

Re: [Cooker] Compupic anyone ?

2002-02-19 Thread Peter Polman
On February 19, 2002 10:36 am, you wrote: > Op di 19-02-2002, om 07:42 schreef Peter Polman: > > On February 18, 2002 12:42 pm, you wrote: > > > Try X in an other depth > > > > Same results in 16 bit depth as with 32 bit depth. If memory serves it > > was ab

Re: [Cooker] Compupic anyone ?

2002-02-18 Thread Peter Polman
it also refused, which is Mandrake 8.1. > > > > regards > > > > On Monday 18 February 2002 09:37, Peter Polman wrote: > > > Anybody using Compupic with the latest Cooker? > > > > > > With the latest packages Compupic refuses to start. Has anyone noted >

[Cooker] Compupic anyone ?

2002-02-18 Thread Peter Polman
Anybody using Compupic with the latest Cooker? With the latest packages Compupic refuses to start. Has anyone noted the same? [peterp@Arthur peterp]$ compupic X Error of failed request: BadValue (integer parameter out of range for operation) Major opcode of failed request: 18 (X_ChangeProp

Re: [Cooker] rpmdb verification failed

2001-11-29 Thread Peter Polman - admin
On Thursday 29 November 2001 12:38 am, you wrote: > rpmdb: Suspiciously high nelem of 4294967295 on page 0 > error: db3 error(-30985) from db->verify: DB_VERIFY_BAD: Database > verification failed > > I have this after every rpm -U and it happened on other system as well > since recent update to n

[Cooker] sgml-common conflicts with xml-common

2001-08-27 Thread Peter Polman
[root@PAULA RPMS]# rpm -Uvh sgml-common-0.6.3-1mdk.noarch.rpm Preparing...### [100%] file /usr/share/sgml/xml-iso-entities-8879.1986/catalog from install of sgml-common-0.6.3-1mdk conflicts with file from package xml-common-0.1-3mdk

Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake still doesn't work

2001-07-14 Thread Peter Polman
On Friday 13 July 2001 07:19, you wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 06:26:11PM -0600, Peter Polman wrote: > > On Thursday 12 July 2001 09:04, you wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I've been told that I should communicate more on > > > rpmdra

Re: [Cooker]

2001-07-13 Thread Peter Polman
On Friday 13 July 2001 07:19, you wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 06:26:11PM -0600, Peter Polman wrote: > > On Thursday 12 July 2001 09:04, you wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I've been told that I should communicate more on > > > rpmdra

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake to test

2001-07-12 Thread Peter Polman
On Thursday 12 July 2001 09:04, you wrote: > Hi, > > I've been told that I should communicate more on rpmdrake/mandrakeuupdate > aka "Software Manager", so I do. > > I've just uploaded a new release of rpmdrake (1.3-73mdk), which should fix > the "rpmdrake does nothing" bug. I.e. packages ar

[Cooker] Update request

2001-07-11 Thread Peter Polman
Would it be possible to get perl-gettext upgraded to 1.01 ? I'm trying to get gmmusic to work and it requires a newer version than what's in Cooker.

[Cooker] errors while trying to run rpmdrake

2001-06-25 Thread Peter Polman
rpmdrake has quit on me after the last updates. Here's what I get: [root@PAULA RPMS]# rpmdrake rpmdrake: error while loading shared libraries: rpmdrake: undefined symbol: XrpmdbNextIterator [root@PAULA RPMS]# rpm -q rpmdrake rpmdrake-1.3-65mdk [root@PAULA RPMS]# rpm -q urpmi urpmi-1.6-3mdk [root

[Cooker] libatk

2001-06-04 Thread Peter Polman
Has it been mentioned that the posted libatk package is buitl for i686 and not for the i586 as the extension suggests?

[Cooker] rpmtools breaks RPM

2001-06-03 Thread Peter Polman
I'm slowly bringing my system up to date ... until rpmtools (-23mdk) broke my RPM. I get seg faults when I try to remove, install or upgrade any packages now. How can I fix RPM?

Re: [Cooker] kcontrol ... still no answers

2001-05-03 Thread Peter Polman
On Tuesday 01 May 2001 18:10, you wrote: > I've asked this before << Snip>> > Can anybody point me to the file where the X-KDE-BaseGroup=settings should > be located? <> For some of you out there that still have this problem, here's what I've found out. 1. usr/share/applnk directory is No Longer

[Cooker] kcontrol ... still no answers

2001-05-01 Thread Peter Polman
I've asked this before and had no answer. I've searched through the cooker mailing lists as well as KDE's bug reports. Obviously several other people have experienced the blank menu under kcontrol and have posted their questions. I've yet to see an answer. According to what I've skimmed throug

Re: [Cooker] kcontrol menu

2001-04-20 Thread Peter Polman
David BAUDENS wrote: > Peter Polman écrivit : > >> I've had this error for quite some time: >> kcontrol: WARNING: No K menu group with X-KDE-BaseGroup=settings found ! >> Defaulting to Settings/ >> Of course I can copy the settings folder from /usr/share/appln

[Cooker] kcontrol menu

2001-04-16 Thread Peter Polman
I've had this error for quite some time: kcontrol: WARNING: No K menu group with X-KDE-BaseGroup=settings found ! Defaulting to Settings/ Of course I can copy the settings folder from /usr/share/applnk to usr/share/applnk-mdk to get the menu back but this is not what I should be doing. How do I