Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake and newbies: they sometimes miss *installed* software

2003-06-19 Thread andre
The security problem only exist if you couldn't get that information in another way. But i don't think that is the case seeing that only /usr/sbin/glibc-post-upgrade isn't readable on my system as normal user.

[Cooker] mail?

2003-06-18 Thread andre

Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake and newbies: they sometimes miss *installed* software

2003-06-17 Thread andre
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 22:21, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > > Argh. "another addition to the GUI".. > More like rpmdrake and rpmdrake-remove are just not the right tool for non-root users to select rpms. I would remove your May 28 addition.

Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake and newbies: they sometimes miss *installed* software

2003-06-17 Thread andre
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 15:39, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > And of course, at present rpmdrake can only be run as root. If it were > > Untrue! This time you suck.. you asked for that feature, I've > said I would add it, I've added it on May 28, but you

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] urpmi-4.3-15mdk

2003-06-16 Thread andre
On Monday 16 June 2003 11:18, François Pons wrote: > Another problably good approach would be using compssUsers file, as no lib > package are listed as only effective packages (for the user) are inside it. > > François. What about lib$something-devel and pygnome-libglade

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 4056] [Installation] New: mouse position should not determine input focus

2003-06-13 Thread andre
On Friday 13 June 2003 14:45, Pixel wrote: > @resolution=wontfix This is a really annoying bug and makes that you can't install Mandrake properly. This should be fix

Re: [Cooker] Knoppix-like CD based on Mandrake

2003-06-13 Thread andre
http://sourceforge.net/projects/virtual-linux/ and google cache

Re: [Cooker] e16 pre out with gnome2 and kde3 compatibility

2003-06-11 Thread andre
On Wednesday 11 June 2003 09:07, Thibaut Fernagut wrote: > Hi baudens, > > I did a grep on the changelog : > * Sat Jun 22 2002 Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0.16.5-12mdk > > so I don't know if you are still the maintainer of this package. $./rpmmon.pl -p enlightenment baudens see http:/

Re: [Cooker] [ALPHA:SPARC] 7.1b -> cooker update

2003-06-06 Thread andre
On Friday 06 June 2003 19:17, Stefan van der Eijk wrote: > Jaroslaw, > >1) is there a way to upgrade 7.1b -> cooker on a running system? > > This _should_ be possible. Grab a copy of the mirror, put it local on > the box, remove all possible 7.1b packages from the machine, upgrade the > rest to coo

Re: [Cooker] du -b doesn't work correctly

2003-06-05 Thread andre
On Wednesday 04 June 2003 16:55, Götz Waschk wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 4. Juni 2003, 16:42:26 Uhr MET, schrieb andre: > > If i make a file with > > $dd if=/dev/zero of=test count=1 seek=1 > > > > than > > $du test > > 4 test > > > > which

[Cooker] du -b doesn't work correctly

2003-06-05 Thread andre
If i make a file with $dd if=/dev/zero of=test count=1 seek=1 than $du test 4 test which is the correct answer. But if i do $du -b test 5120512 test Which isn't the correct answer. It should be like $/oldMandrake/usr/bin/du -b test 4096test

Re: [Cooker] mute list or deaf me ?

2003-06-04 Thread andre
On Wednesday 04 June 2003 00:04, Oden Eriksson wrote: > onsdagen den 4 juni 2003 00.03 skrev J.A. Magallon: > > Linux 2.4.21-rc7-jam1 > > "jam1"? could it be that J.A. Magallon made his own kernel :)

Re: [Cooker] Why there isn't Beijing in timezone?

2003-05-27 Thread andre
On Tuesday 27 May 2003 18:58, Buchan Milne wrote: > I guess GMT is covered by London? GMT doesn't use summertime IIRC. London does

Re: [Cooker] wish list for 9.2

2003-03-31 Thread andre
On Monday 31 March 2003 00:36, Leon Brooks wrote: > On Sunday 30 March 2003 16:58, Michael Scherer wrote: > > Since dosemu without a OS image is useless, they dropped it. > > That's a false assumption if ever I've seen one. Nothing wrong with > installing your own copy of MS-DOS 6.22 under DOSEMU.

Re: [Cooker] Re: rpmdrake features (was: urpmi features)

2003-03-26 Thread andre
On Wednesday 26 March 2003 05:18, huug wrote: > I'ld wish rpmdrake would do the right thing with changelogs: display > them before the files list by default, so that it's usable even when > launched from drakconf. Add a --hide-changelog flag for the people > who want only to see the files list, or

Re: [Cooker] RC3, 3 CD's over 650MB??

2003-03-25 Thread andre
On Monday 24 March 2003 21:51, Jason Greenwood wrote: > Didn't Mandrake decide to keep the ISO's under 650MB?? > > Cheers > > Jason Talking about 650MB ISO's. What is the decision for hamer and itanic. Will they also have 650 ISO's or 700 ISO's. I think 700 ISO would be normal for them

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 9.1 rc3?????

2003-03-24 Thread andre
On Monday 24 March 2003 19:48, Francisco Alcaraz Ariza wrote: > Some of the servers are downloading new files instead of the rc2 and, at > the moment, they are named rc3!!! > > Is a rc3 comming??? > > Regards Didn't they use this trick with 9.0. Wasn't rc3==9.0gold

Re: [Cooker] mmx and such

2003-03-21 Thread andre
On Friday 21 March 2003 15:18, Guy.Bormann wrote: > [snip] > > > It's not a matter of complaining or not, it's a matter of minimal > > support. Mandrake Linux is supposed to run on any i586 or newer > > processor. Period. > > Even if that means a crazy person is encoding videos on a i586(no MMX), >

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 3450] [Installation] New: Diamond SpeedStar A90 & ViewSonic 6E configured incorrectly

2003-03-20 Thread andre
It maybe nice if you would name the chipset used in the Diamond SpeedStar A90. Some googling shows it to be a S3 Savage4 Pro+

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] dosbox-0.57-2mdk

2003-03-20 Thread andre
On Thursday 20 March 2003 22:04, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote: > according to the author it should run on other archs too, but he was unsure > if this was the case for 0.57 or not, 0.58 which be out at the end of this > month should at least run on other archs.. So you can run dosprograms on an other

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 3464] [enlightenment] New: .xvpics directory

2003-03-20 Thread andre
On Thursday 20 March 2003 15:38, scherer.michael wrote: > http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3464 > >Product: enlightenment > Component: enlightenment >Summary: .xvpics directory >Version: 0.16.5-12mdk > Platform: PC > OS/Versio

Re: [Cooker] dosemu

2003-03-19 Thread andre
On Thursday 20 March 2003 01:39, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > anyone knows where dosemu went? why is it no longer in contrib nor main?:( I think the reason is that it can't be build with a free compiler. But maybe http://dosbox.zophar.net is an o

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 3195] [XFree86] New: Cannot type "" (Euro currency symbol) with US International keyboard

2003-03-15 Thread andre
On Tuesday 11 March 2003 23:39, till wrote: > http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3195 > >Product: XFree86 > Component: XFree86 >Summary: Cannot type "€" (Euro currency symbol) with US > International keyboard >Version: 4.3-3md

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] dvd+rw-tools-5.2.4.1.4-1mdk

2003-03-10 Thread andre
On Tuesday 11 March 2003 02:36, Jason Greenwood wrote: > HOPEFULLY it means Mandrakesoft has come to its senses and realises we > all need more time to do some bugsquishing prior to the (very rapid) > final release to ensure that it goes smoother than 9.0 did. > > Kind Regards, > > Jason Greenwood

Re: [Cooker] xmovie as default on KDE

2003-03-10 Thread andre
On Monday 10 March 2003 18:06, Henri wrote: > Hi, > i installed 9.0 and upgraded to 9.1RC2. > Is it normal that xmovie is the default video viewer under KDE ? That > such an ugly software ! Why not having the embedded reader by default ? mime is not good in kde at the moment

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] ati.2-4.3.20030307-1mdk

2003-03-09 Thread andre
On Saturday 08 March 2003 23:12, Spencer Anderson wrote: > On Sat, 08 Mar 2003 22:55:18 +0100 > > Pascal Terjan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Pascal Terjan wrote: > > > rpm --verify ati.2 > > > > > > If files were changed you have XFree one :-) > > > > More seriously, just did the update. ati.2 wa

Re: [Cooker] tightvnc-server, no desktop or window manager started

2003-03-09 Thread andre
On Monday 10 March 2003 00:02, Greg Meyer wrote: > On Saturday 08 March 2003 11:58 pm, Quel Qun wrote: > > $ Xnest -ac :1 & > > $ DISPLAY=:1 startkde > > I am unfamiliar with Xnest, but I installed XFree86-Xnest and tried to > start it with the command you indicated and got > > Fatal server error:

Re: [Cooker] kdemoreartwork proposal

2003-03-08 Thread andre
On Saturday 08 March 2003 05:38, Andi Payn wrote: > If you're just looking for a non-controversial way to free up space on the > Mandrake CD's, look elsewhere. Removing the .xvpics files. They are included in many rpms but i doubt they are used ever

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 1859] [kdeartwork] Not included in 3.1

2003-03-07 Thread andre
On Friday 07 March 2003 17:00, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 20:43, jokerman64 wrote: > > I don't think the package is essential but I in no way think that it > > should be left out. I was pretty pissed the last time the screensavers > > were left out and don't want to see this hap

Re: [Cooker] kde is seriously broken.

2003-03-07 Thread andre
On Friday 07 March 2003 19:37, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > when i do "open in new window" in konqueror it opens a galeon window. > > This suck. MIME is again broken. > > This same problem makes it also that galeon is sta

[Cooker] kde is seriously broken.

2003-03-07 Thread andre
when i do "open in new window" in konqueror it opens a galeon window. This suck. MIME is again broken. ps rpmmon doesn't seem to work, is there a new version out or so?

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 1245] [Installation] kdenetwork-kppp is not automatically selected as part of kde workstation install

2003-03-06 Thread andre
On Friday 07 March 2003 00:39, Jason Greenwood wrote: > Why the hell has it been separated from kde network??? This seems futile > IMHO. > Cause to make it work you need a setuid program (ppp and kppp probably too) which if you don't use ppp is not something you want to have installed. The other

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 2839] [skobo] New: Unneeded directory in package

2003-03-06 Thread andre
On Thursday 06 March 2003 13:17, rrowan wrote: > http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2839 > >Product: skobo > Component: packaging >Summary: Unneeded directory in package >Version: 0.4-0.pre8.6mdk > Platform: PC > OS/Version: All

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 1859] [kdeartwork] Not included in 3.1

2003-03-06 Thread andre
On Thursday 06 March 2003 09:17, waschk wrote: > > > --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-06 > 09:17 --- Hey, this is no important package, it's 12 MB of stuff that > can be better used for applications. > divide it up in essential and pretty

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 1847] [drakxtools] isdn startup at boot after configuration

2003-03-06 Thread andre
On Thursday 06 March 2003 17:22, Steffen Barszus wrote: > On Thursday 06 March 2003 13:34, rcc wrote: > > definitely, Germany (=ISDN country) is the second largest market next to > > the US. I just don't understand how mdk can afford to surrender that > > market to SuSE. I've personally converted l

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 2528] [kernel] deadkeys in numeric row on French keyboard not active

2003-03-04 Thread andre
On Tuesday 04 March 2003 13:00, pixel wrote: > - as it should be! "~" is of no use in french > - à è are available directly > > Uhm, so cd ~/ doesn't work in france

Re: [Cooker] Xfree 4.3 and RandR

2003-03-03 Thread andre
On Monday 03 March 2003 14:33, Steffen Barszus wrote: > On Monday 03 March 2003 13:06, andre wrote: > > RandR is something you complain about if you don't have it and never use > > if you have it > > Whats that ? There are uses of it, and there are people that used to h

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 2636] [rpmdrake] New: Improvements to UI

2003-03-03 Thread andre
rpmdrake isn't only for cooker users but also for normal users. They are more likely to be interested in the files than the changelog. ps. rpmdrake --changelog-first does that to, You could alias it

Re: [Cooker] Xfree 4.3 and RandR

2003-03-03 Thread andre
On Monday 03 March 2003 13:05, Steffen Barszus wrote: > I feel that this RandR feature is a must have. A lot of people was > complaining about it a long time. RandR is something you complain about if you don't have it and never use if you have it

Re: [Cooker] MIME types - usability issue

2003-03-01 Thread andre
On Wednesday 26 February 2003 17:43, Jan Ciger wrote: > > Hi, > > I noticed one change after the upgrade of my cooker today - kmail is not > able to open links inside of the mail with Konqueror anymore. Upon clicking > on the the link, Quanta pops up :-( > > I checked the associations and text/html

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 1333] [gtk+2.0] pb with numeric keypad

2003-02-27 Thread andre
On Thursday 27 February 2003 22:14, Frederic Crozat wrote: > You mean you too have '.' on your keypad but ',' is your decimal separator > ? > > ARg.. Yes

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 1333] [gtk+2.0] pb with numeric keypad

2003-02-27 Thread andre
On Thursday 27 February 2003 23:31, John Keller wrote: > Frederic Crozat wrote: > > Besides, it'd be ironic for a French-driven disto to chnage the correct > > > behavior in the French locale only. ;) > > > > I would prefer to patch French maths to use '.' instead of ',' :)) > > So would I, but I'

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 1333] [gtk+2.0] pb with numeric keypad

2003-02-27 Thread andre
On Thursday 27 February 2003 21:03, fcrozat wrote: > http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333 > I've explained the behaviour wanted by GTK authors.. (decimal separator key > on keypad should print separator for current locale) > > Unfortunately, on french keyboard, instead of having a ',' (

Re: [Cooker] Bug 1583 not taken into account ?

2003-02-27 Thread andre
On Thursday 27 February 2003 12:50, Buchan Milne wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Reinout van Schouwen wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Buchan Milne wrote: > >>> a) Edit /etc/hosts > >>> b) Give up on proftpd / gnome and use something else. > >> > >>c) Fix your DNS. >

Re: [Cooker] MIME types - usability issue

2003-02-26 Thread andre
On Wednesday 26 February 2003 17:43, Jan Ciger wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed one change after the upgrade of my cooker today - kmail is not > able to open links inside of the mail with Konqueror anymore. Upon clicking > on the the link, Quanta pops up :-( > > I checked the associations and text/html i

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 2345] [metacity] Shortcut keys don't work

2003-02-26 Thread andre
On Wednesday 26 February 2003 13:40, reinout wrote: > http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2345 > > > > > > --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-26 13:40 --- > Frédéric, > > I am using US keyboard layout. The "nl" keyboard layout does exist but > nobody produces or

[Cooker] new window in konqueror starts galeon

2003-02-22 Thread andre
Not yet looked at why but i get a galeon window instead of a konqueror window if i use open in new window

Re: [Cooker] Re: wine-20020219

2003-02-20 Thread andre
On Thursday 20 February 2003 23:10, rcc wrote: > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 21:40:53 +0100 > > andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thursday 20 February 2003 20:09, rcc wrote: > > > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 18:39:24 +0100 > > > > > > andre <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [Cooker] How to rebuild nvidia-kernel for rc1

2003-02-20 Thread andre
On Thursday 20 February 2003 17:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 08:44:15 -0800 (PST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > In fact the drivers was build and installed, but when you try to install > > nvidia-glx there is an error about "failed dependencies, nvidia-kernel" > > is needed").

Re: [Cooker] Re: wine-20020219

2003-02-20 Thread andre
On Thursday 20 February 2003 20:09, rcc wrote: > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 18:39:24 +0100 > > andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > winemine is buildin, notepad is a script to use the windows version. > > err, not necessarily, on my box it uses builtin notepad, I'm pretty

Re: [Cooker] Re: wine-20020219

2003-02-20 Thread andre
On Thursday 20 February 2003 19:11, rcc wrote: > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 12:11:56 -0500 > > Paul R Streitman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We have a much bigger problem than getting the current wine release > > (although I agree it would be worthwhile) - currently wine does not > > work at all because

[Cooker] Re:

2003-02-20 Thread andre
On Thursday 20 February 2003 17:40, you wrote: > From: Bugzilla Mail Interface <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Bugzilla Result: > In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > ERROR process: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > is not a valid qa.mandrakesoft.com login. > Please first create an account with a valid mai

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 1254] [drakconf] New: Can't open drakconf!

2003-02-04 Thread andre
mcc works now but i get this error message: (drakconf.real:15548): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: file ../../gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbuf-util.c: line 183 (gdk_pixbuf_saturate_and_pixelate): assertion `gdk_pixbuf_get_has_alpha (src) == gdk_pixbuf_get_has_alpha (dest)' failed BUG with LANGUAGE nl_NL:nl and m

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 1254] [drakconf] New: Can't open drakconf!

2003-02-03 Thread andre
Sorry, type error export LC_MESSAGE=C LANG=C

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 1254] [drakconf] New: Can't open drakconf!

2003-02-03 Thread andre
On Tuesday 04 February 2003 00:25, Wim Horst wrote: > Op maandag 3 februari 2003 23:38, schreef [Bug 1254]: > > https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254 > > > >Product: drakconf > > Component: drakconf > >Summary: Can't open drakconf! > >Version:

Re: [Cooker] KDE apps splitting: why stop there ?

2003-02-02 Thread andre
On Sunday 02 February 2003 13:12, Guillaume Rousse wrote: > I just saw kpackage and kppp were split from kdeadmin and kdenetwork, great > ! Please keep up good work, it does really gives package an additional > value over tarballs. I dream of a kdenetwork-kmail package... kppp has suid issues whic

Re: [Cooker] burner doesn't work anymore

2003-02-01 Thread andre
On Sunday 02 February 2003 00:31, Quel Qun wrote: > On Sat, 2003-02-01 at 14:18, andre wrote: > > With one of the updates my dvd player has been moved from /dev/hdb to > > /dev/scd0 and my burner form /dev/scd0 to /dev/scd1. This means that the > > dvd player /mnt/cdrom has c

[Cooker] burner doesn't work anymore

2003-02-01 Thread andre
With one of the updates my dvd player has been moved from /dev/hdb to /dev/scd0 and my burner form /dev/scd0 to /dev/scd1. This means that the dvd player /mnt/cdrom has changed to /mnt/cdrom2 and the burner isn't viewable at all. I have repaired fstab but i don't think every user of Mandrake is

Re: [Cooker] win32 for 9.1? migration tools

2003-02-01 Thread andre
On Saturday 01 February 2003 18:09, Leon Brooks wrote: > You can apply those to source, which means you can check them, be more > selective, and mix patches if necessary. Closed source doesn't permit that. > Also, PostgreSQL seems to have suffered far fewer security faux pas > (francophones: any id

Re: [Cooker] win32 for 9.1? migration tools

2003-02-01 Thread andre
On Saturday 01 February 2003 19:02, Buchan Milne wrote: > On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, andre wrote: > > On Saturday 01 February 2003 16:00, Buchan Milne wrote: > > > boxes to patch?", "Don't worry, we installed latest Mandrake and it > > > migrate our dbs to p

Re: [Cooker] win32 for 9.1? migration tools

2003-02-01 Thread andre
On Saturday 01 February 2003 16:00, Buchan Milne wrote: > On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Leon Brooks wrote: > > And from Unix (SFU - Services For Unix, GPLed(!) software to supply many > > of the Unix services and features still absent from Windows). > > And they still complain about the GPL? They bought the

Re: [Cooker] win32 for 9.1?

2003-01-31 Thread andre
On Friday 31 January 2003 13:22, Michael Scherer wrote: > Le Vendredi 31 Janvier 2003 12:57, Chmouel Boudjnah a écrit : > > Oden Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Here's my proposal. Why not ship distributable win32 applications like > > > "WinSCP", cygwin, etc? > > > > i don't belive that

Re: [Cooker] win32 for 9.1?

2003-01-31 Thread andre
On Friday 31 January 2003 10:16, Oden Eriksson wrote: > Hi. > > Here's my proposal. Why not ship distributable win32 applications like > "WinSCP", cygwin, etc? There are some Japanese distribution of cygwin who uses rpm as package system. Maybe something to add to build system next to the sparc,

Re: [Cooker] What happened to the program "more"?

2003-01-30 Thread andre
On Friday 31 January 2003 02:40, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 01:25, Lonnie Borntreger wrote: > > > > >After seeing the program dog( as in a more powerful form of cat) in > > > > > contribs I was wondering, what happened to the program "more"? > > > > > > I have a more in /bin...I

Re: [Cooker] Linux Audio Users

2003-01-30 Thread andre
On Thursday 30 January 2003 18:41, Buchan Milne wrote: > But just KDE3 and > OpenOffice.org doesn't do well on 128MB. Surprisingly :)

Re: [Cooker] icons/default/index.theme missing

2003-01-30 Thread andre
On Thursday 30 January 2003 16:02, Bret Baptist wrote: > On Wednesday 29 January 2003 7:37 pm, Adam Williamson wrote: > > How do you mean, temporary workaround? This isn't a bug, it's a design > > choice. The reversion to old cursors is mentioned in the changelog of > > the latest X as something MD

Re: [Cooker] Linux Audio Users

2003-01-30 Thread andre
On Thursday 30 January 2003 03:13, Leon Brooks wrote: > If I have a multi-screen machine (e.g. four screens, four video cards, four > sets of USB mice and keyboards), and the users on these screens are running > disparate WM's, where do they stand WRT sound daemons? > > Have the designers of these

Re: [Cooker] Linux Audio Users

2003-01-30 Thread andre
On Thursday 30 January 2003 10:21, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 02:13, Leon Brooks wrote: > > On Thursday 30 January 2003 09:42 am, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > esd and arts should never "walk all over each other" - > > > one belongs to GNOME and should only be running when GNOME

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 1023] [Installation] New: unable to go back to the start of the installation

2003-01-23 Thread andre
On Thursday 23 January 2003 15:25, Pixel wrote: > "[Bug 1023]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > when I've advanced, the package selection, I was unable to go back to > > select another keyboard layout. > > @resolution=wontfix > > why exactly would you want to change the keyboard layout at the > pack

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 974] [mount] New: fat32 filesytem mounted as world-writable

2003-01-23 Thread andre
On Wednesday 22 January 2003 12:01, Buchan Milne wrote: > Todd Lyons wrote: > > Nearly every problem that someone has when trying to save files to a FAT > > partition is because they don't realize they need to be root. Should we > > protect them from possible bad things and make it umask=022, or s

Re: [Cooker] 9.1 Beta 2

2003-01-21 Thread andre
On Tuesday 21 January 2003 17:52, Pascal Cavy wrote: > Le Mardi 21 Janvier 2003 16:20, andre a écrit : > > On Monday 20 January 2003 17:17, Austin Acton wrote: > > > On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 11:17, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > > > > a sound editing tool whose "

Re: [Cooker] 9.1 Beta 2

2003-01-21 Thread andre
On Monday 20 January 2003 17:17, Austin Acton wrote: > On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 11:17, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > > a sound editing tool whose "sound is broken" and which "can not > > record" can still be a very good app? :) > > Sound is only broken in KDE. > Austin "Soundrecording" with gnomemmet

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 795] [XFree86] Cursor shadow is annoying

2003-01-21 Thread andre
On Monday 20 January 2003 16:19, R.I.P. Deaddog wrote: > > Regarding the grandparent post: X ships with a cursor set without > > shadows called handhelds (see /usr/lib/X11/icons). As has been already > > mentioned several times on this list, you can change the default by > > changing default/index.

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rpmdrake-2.1-2mdk

2003-01-21 Thread andre
On Tuesday 21 January 2003 00:46, Benjamin Pflugmann wrote: > On Mon 2003-01-20 at 20:49:04 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > [...] > > > Somebody else suggested to divide maximum information into the three. > > Maybe that is an idea. Changelog is something i like to see and now i > > have to scrol

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rpmdrake-2.1-2mdk

2003-01-20 Thread andre
On Monday 20 January 2003 16:32, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I have seen that you can now have maximum information about an rpm but > > could you make it like with the old rpmdrake were you could select > > between the desc

Re: [Cooker] Package verification

2003-01-18 Thread andre
On Thursday 16 January 2003 18:45, Buchan Milne wrote: > Götz Waschk wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 16. Januar 2003, 19:04:37 Uhr MET, schrieb Buchan Milne: > >>To know whether your CDs are ok before you format? > > > > So you want to run a rpm -K *rpm before starting to install anything? > > This shoul

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake Broke?

2003-01-17 Thread andre
On Friday 17 January 2003 00:02, J. Greenlees wrote: > so, besides the bankruptcy protection application, maybe Mandrake can > look at other mainframe manufacturers to see if any of them would be > willing to invest in Mandrake, as IBM did with SUSE. The reason why IBM gave money to SuSE was that

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] Geramik-0.17-2mdk

2003-01-15 Thread andre
On Wednesday 15 January 2003 15:53, Michael Scherer wrote: > > I think it's a good thing to package it like any other GTK theme. > > I understand what you want though. But imo it would only make sense if > > you select Keramik in Kcontrol and decide to have other apps follow that > > theme, maybe t

Re: [Cooker] 9.1 Beta 1.

2003-01-13 Thread andre
On Monday 13 January 2003 03:06, Ron Stodden wrote: > > 2. The following RPMs are not present in addition to those in 1 above): > > libtobe > unicon-input > FreeWnn > chininput > xcin > ami > kon > xa+cv > xenkb > XFree86-serever-4.2.99 > libijs > ne > > Most of these are Japanes, Korean or Chines

Re: [Cooker] Aladdin license?

2003-01-11 Thread andre
On Sunday 12 January 2003 00:32, Mark Scott wrote: > 2(a)(i) It is posting it on a public access area for download, where the > charge is a fee for downloading an amount of data, irrespective of what > that data is, e.g. $0.02 per Mb. > > Exclusion 2(a)(i) does not apply to Mandrake, since no charg

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rpmdrake-2.1-2mdk

2003-01-10 Thread andre
On Friday 10 January 2003 17:42, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > please test and report any problem (I'll be in vacations jan > 11-18 though - but mails won't be lost, hopefully). I have seen that you can now have maximum information about an rpm but could you make it like with the old rpmdrake we

Re: [Cooker] Prepare for the onslaught.

2003-01-10 Thread andre
On Saturday 11 January 2003 01:15, Austin Acton wrote: > On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 19:04, Pierre Fortin wrote: > > 1.44 & 650MB are ubiquitous; 700MB and DVD > > aren't yet. > > I dunno about the rest of the world, but if I go to > http://www.futureshop.ca right now (Canadian equivalent of BestBuy), an

Re: [Cooker] Prepare for the onslaught.

2003-01-10 Thread andre
On Friday 10 January 2003 20:29, Gerard Patel wrote: > At 12:01 PM 1/10/03 -0500, you wrote: > >ShoreWall is (IMHO) awful. I install it only because I > >think it was required by some other package, but I > >"chkconfig --del" it, and keep a copy of Bastille rpms > >handy to do the job. > > My gues

[Cooker] php-manual-en

2003-01-10 Thread andre
You have php-manual-en in contrib and php-manual_en in cooker. Seems to me the same content. I also miss php-manual-nl

Re: [Cooker] Cursor in latest XFree86

2003-01-07 Thread andre
On Monday 06 January 2003 21:06, Jason Straight wrote: > On Monday 06 January 2003 09:43 am, Vincent Meyer, MD wrote: > > Hello, > > > > For a brief while there was a pink cursor - and while people complained > > about it, it actually seemed to work pretty for me. Also, the > > see-through and

Re: [Cooker] Saving Mandrake - a Users Perspective

2003-01-01 Thread andre
On Sunday 29 December 2002 06:07, Leon Brooks wrote: > On Friday 27 December 2002 02:43 pm, SI Reasoning wrote: > > The best thing about having the iso out before > > the boxed set is that you have all of these people testing and reporting > > problems back to get fixed. > > No. The ISO is in theor

Re: [Cooker] New nvidia drivers

2002-12-15 Thread andre
On Sunday 15 December 2002 02:46, J.A. Magallon wrote: > On 2002.12.14 andre wrote: > >On Saturday 14 December 2002 09:59, Lea Gris wrote: > >> This is a hardware feature not a driver software implementation. 128 > >> bits graphic chips would have much much work address

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake and business.

2002-12-14 Thread andre
On Saturday 14 December 2002 17:11, Steffen Barszus wrote: > On Saturday 14 December 2002 16:25, Warly wrote: > > "francesco.melo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > i have dvd-r burner ... so for me and i think for other user it is > > > better to have a single big iso in the mirror > > > and bur

Re: [Cooker] New nvidia drivers

2002-12-14 Thread andre
On Saturday 14 December 2002 09:59, Lea Gris wrote: > This is a hardware feature not a driver software implementation. 128 > bits graphic chips would have much much work addressing odd order of > bytes boundary (24bits 3 bytes) in memory even worse this would require > one more address line switch

Re: [Cooker] New nvidia drivers

2002-12-13 Thread andre
On Friday 13 December 2002 18:38, Murray J. Root wrote: > To followup myself - > according to NVidia docs, 24bpp uses 32bpp, just the high order > 8 bits are not used. > So the correct calculation is > > 1600*1200 pixels * 32bpp/8bits_per_byte / (1024*1024 bytes_per_Meg) = 7.3M I know that is tr

Re: [Cooker] Bugzilla posts absolutely nescessary?

2002-12-13 Thread andre
On Friday 13 December 2002 14:31, andre wrote: > There is a bigger problem. The bugzilla post are unreadable. They start > with https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi? which says nothing to me > except when i go to that webpage. Than there is optional some extra info. > After that

Re: [Cooker] Bugzilla posts absolutely nescessary?

2002-12-13 Thread andre
On Monday 09 December 2002 16:50, Warly wrote: > I think there is 2 problems. > > - first one is technical, when you reply to the bug into cooker you > get your comment posted both by sympa an bugzilla, this I can fix. > > - second one is maintainers and subscribers problems. Some of them do > not

Re: [Cooker] licq and set autoresponse

2002-11-20 Thread andre
On Tuesday 19 November 2002 08:20, Vox wrote: > This time "J.P. Pasnak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > becomes daring and writes: > > !, > > > > Anyone else having a problem with LICQ w/kde-gui pinning the processor > > with the Set AutoResponse window stuck open? Cookered right up... > > maybe a pr

Re: DNS (was: Re: [Cooker] WTF?)

2002-11-14 Thread andre
On Thursday 14 November 2002 23:30, Vincent Danen wrote: > Quite frankly, I'd like to see another DNS server in main. We phased > out wu-ftpd as the defacto FTP server with proftpd... I'd like to see > something take the place of bind as well. If, for nothing else, then > as a caching-nameserver

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake Made Easy: a modest suggestion for Windows users[linux , what sucks ?]

2002-11-14 Thread andre
On Thursday 14 November 2002 13:17, Oden Eriksson wrote: > torsdagen den 14 november 2002 13.08 skrev Faraj Meir: > > > 1 ) to get the register ( easy, these file are well known , system.dat, > > > > and > > > > > user.dat ) > > > > No problem > > > > > 2 ) to read it ( difficult part ), and to get

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake Made Easy: a modest suggestion for Windowsusers

2002-11-05 Thread andre
On Tuesday 05 November 2002 04:06, Robert martin wrote: > how about this in the windows program (you know that autorun thing you > get) > > 1 do an export of the hku tree and a dir of the users file tree (vast > amounts of user data since 75% of the "good" windows programs keep their > settings in

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] kdelibs-3.1-0.beta2.11mdk

2002-10-30 Thread andre
On Wednesday 30 October 2002 16:42, Guy.Bormann wrote: > On 30 Oct 2002, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Wed, 2002-10-30 at 12:13, Guy.Bormann wrote: > > > > Linux you just highlight and middle click. And yes > > > > > > ^^ > > >what has Linux got to do with it??!!! You meant KDE? > >

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] kdelibs-3.1-0.beta2.11mdk

2002-10-30 Thread andre
On Wednesday 30 October 2002 14:14, David Walser wrote: > --- andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wednesday 30 October 2002 06:05, Vincent Danen > > > > wrote: > > > Ok, this is *really* laughable. You think GNOME > > > > is more similar to >

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] kdelibs-3.1-0.beta2.11mdk

2002-10-30 Thread andre
On Wednesday 30 October 2002 06:05, Vincent Danen wrote: > Ok, this is *really* laughable. You think GNOME is more similar to > windows than KDE? What kinda pot you been smoking? Care to share? > KDE is the biggest Windows wanna-be out there! One reason I *don't* > run KDE is because it reminds

Re: [Cooker] MDK 8.2, 1024 MB RAM

2002-10-29 Thread andre
On Tuesday 29 October 2002 21:35, Peter Magnusson wrote: > On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Bryan Whitehead wrote: > > Actaully it's more than that. A machine with 2GB of ram only sees this > > without highmem: > > total used free sharedbuffers cached > > Mem:904940

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >