[Cooker] autoconf tricked?

2002-09-17 Thread Austin Acton
Hey Guillaume, I'm not an autoconf expert, but this program seems to be tricking your /usr/bin/autoconf script: bash-2.05b$ ./autogen.sh Running autoheader FATAL ERROR: Autoconf version 2.52 or higher is required for this script Running aclocal Running automake Running autoconf FATAL ERROR:

Re: [Cooker] autoconf tricked?

2002-09-17 Thread danny
Looks similar as when you try to compile kde with automake 1.6 (instead of 1.4). I thought kde was at fault, but since Laurent seems to ignore my mails, maybe it is the script. On 17 Sep 2002, Austin Acton wrote: Hey Guillaume, I'm not an autoconf expert, but this program seems to be

Re: [Cooker] autoconf tricked?

2002-09-17 Thread Austin Acton
No, the application is non-standard. Austin On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 12:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looks similar as when you try to compile kde with automake 1.6 (instead of 1.4). I thought kde was at fault, but since Laurent seems to ignore my mails, maybe it is the script. On 17 Sep

[Cooker] AUTOCONF

2002-06-27 Thread Lucio Tarantino
Hallo, I have a little question. Why in cooker there is autoconf-2.13-12mdk ( version 2.13 ) and not the new version 2.52 or 2.53? All KDE3 new project require this new version and I have mount manually but why is not in cooker? Lucio smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic

Re: [Cooker] AUTOCONF

2002-06-27 Thread Lucio Tarantino
Also automake is version 1.4-p5 and not the new 1.5 why? Lucio Tarantino wrote: Hallo, I have a little question. Why in cooker there is autoconf-2.13-12mdk ( version 2.13 ) and not the new version 2.52 or 2.53? All KDE3 new project require this new version and I have mount manually

Re: [Cooker] AUTOCONF

2002-06-27 Thread Sebastian Dransfeld
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Lucio Tarantino wrote: Hallo, I have a little question. Why in cooker there is autoconf-2.13-12mdk ( version 2.13 ) and not the new version 2.52 or 2.53? All KDE3 new project require this new version and I have mount manually but why is not in cooker?

Re: [Cooker] AUTOCONF

2002-06-27 Thread Marcel Pol
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 11:29:57 +0200 Lucio Tarantino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also automake is version 1.4-p5 and not the new 1.5 why? It is in contribs (1.6 actually), which replaces automake 1.4 I have a little question. Why in cooker there is autoconf-2.13-12mdk ( version 2.13 ) and

Re: [Cooker] AUTOCONF

2002-06-27 Thread Sebastian Dransfeld
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Lucio Tarantino wrote: Also automake is version 1.4-p5 and not the new 1.5 why? Look closer, automake1.6 is there. seb

Re: [Cooker] AUTOCONF

2002-06-27 Thread Magnus Holmberg
you have both in cooker: from ftp://ftp.sunet.se/pub/Linux/distributions/mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS -rw-r--r-- 1 1137 ftpadm 521282 May 9 21:46 autoconf2.5-2.53-2mdk.noarch.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 1137 ftpadm 337091 Jun 14 16:00

[Cooker] autoconf ?

2002-06-01 Thread Magnus Holmberg
How do I configure Mandrake to use autoconf 2.5 ? /M

Re: [Cooker] autoconf ?

2002-06-01 Thread Andrea
Magnus Holmberg wrote: How do I configure Mandrake to use autoconf 2.5 ? /M export WANT_AUTOCONF_2_5=1

[Cooker] autoconf

2002-05-27 Thread SpamKill
I believe autoconf may need to be updated. I try to compile some apps, and they most of the time come up with the below error, or something like it. It may be the ac-wrapper.pl needs some fixing.. This Makefile is only for the CVS repository This will be deleted before making the

RE: [Cooker] autoconf

2002-05-27 Thread Borsenkow Andrej
I believe autoconf may need to be updated. [...] FATAL ERROR: Autoconf version 2.52 or higher is required for this script So install autoconf2.5 and be happy. -andrej

[Cooker] autoconf is very old 2.13

2002-05-16 Thread Jeremy Salch
Just mentioning it -- Mr. Jeremy Salch - Data Services Granbury.Com, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email www.granbury.com - Business Website www.tblx.net - Personal Website

Re: [Cooker] autoconf is very old 2.13

2002-05-16 Thread Goetz Waschk
Am Donnerstag, 16. Mai 2002, 10:02:43 Uhr MET, schrieb Jeremy Salch: Just mentioning it Maybe some programs still need it (incompatibilities autoconf 2.13 vs autoconf 2.5), that't why both versions are in the distribution. And they don't conflict, so where's the problem? -- Götz Waschk

Re: [Cooker] autoconf is very old 2.13

2002-05-16 Thread Jeremy Salch
On Thursday 16 May 2002 10:13 am, Goetz Waschk wrote: Am Donnerstag, 16. Mai 2002, 10:02:43 Uhr MET, schrieb Jeremy Salch: Just mentioning it Maybe some programs still need it (incompatibilities autoconf 2.13 vs autoconf 2.5), that't why both versions are in the distribution. And they

Re: [Cooker] autoconf is very old 2.13

2002-05-16 Thread Thierry Vignaud
Jeremy Salch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Just mentioning it autoconf2.5-2.53 isn't :-) -- il a ete brule au 28e degre (the naheulbeuk witch) c curieux, gcc fonctionne (gwenole)

[Cooker] Autoconf still setting executable suffix to .C for C++ compiles

2001-09-04 Thread John Allen
-- John Allen, Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Orbiscom Ltd,Web:http://www.orbiscom.com/ 3 Sandyford Park,Direct: +353-1-2178610, +353-86-2315986 Sandyford Industrial Estate, Office: +353-1-2945111 Dublin 18.

Re: [Cooker] Autoconf still setting executable suffix to .C for C++ compiles

2001-09-04 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
John Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Do you have an error scenario? -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] Autoconf 2.13 broken

2001-08-19 Thread john . allen
Borsenkow Andrej wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The autoconf 2.13 is detecting .C as the executable suffix. The problem is in the executable suffix check where it only lists *.c *.obj etc.. but not *.C which is the extension that autoconf gives to C++ test programs (conftest.C) Works

Re: [Cooker] Autoconf 2.13 broken

2001-08-17 Thread Borsenkow Andrej
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The autoconf 2.13 is detecting .C as the executable suffix. The problem is in the executable suffix check where it only lists *.c *.obj etc.. but not *.C which is the extension that autoconf gives to C++ test programs (conftest.C) Works fine with 2.14

[Cooker] Autoconf 2.13 broken

2001-08-14 Thread john . allen
The autoconf 2.13 is detecting .C as the executable suffix. The problem is in the executable suffix check where it only lists *.c *.obj etc.. but not *.C which is the extension that autoconf gives to C++ test programs (conftest.C) Works fine with 2.14 -- John Allen

Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.50-1mdk conflicts w/ rpm-build

2001-05-25 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
R.I.P. Deaddog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 24 May 2001, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: So where is rpm-build 4.0-30mdk ? [gc@obiwan ~] rpmwatch -p rpm flepied But if you want you can set Conflict: rpm = 4.1 too. Contact flipied I thought of Conflicts: kernel != 2.1.139 why rpm

Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.50-1mdk conflicts w/ rpm-build

2001-05-25 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
R.I.P. Deaddog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 25 May 2001, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: But if you want you can set Conflict: rpm = 4.1 too. Contact flipied I thought of Conflicts: kernel != 2.1.139 I see. Please note that I was on drugs at that time. Or probably. Just

Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.50-1mdk conflicts w/ rpm-build

2001-05-25 Thread R.I.P. Deaddog
On 25 May 2001, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: But if you want you can set Conflict: rpm = 4.1 too. Contact flipied I thought of Conflicts: kernel != 2.1.139 I see. Just don't upgrade autoconf, that's not a big deal. Yes, Arnd has posted a whole bunch of rpms that barfed at new

Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.50-1mdk conflicts w/ rpm-build

2001-05-24 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Quel Qun [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --=-=-= Name: autoconf Relocations: (not relocateable) Version : 2.50 Vendor: MandrakeSoft Release : 1mdk Build

Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.50-1mdk conflicts w/ rpm-build

2001-05-24 Thread Sebastian Dransfeld
On 24 May 2001, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: Quel Qun [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --=-=-= Name: autoconf Relocations: (not relocateable) Version : 2.50 Vendor: MandrakeSoft

Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.50-1mdk conflicts w/ rpm-build

2001-05-24 Thread Quel Qun
Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quel Qun [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --=-=-= Name: autoconf Relocations: (not relocateable) Version : 2.50 Vendor: MandrakeSoft

Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.50-1mdk conflicts w/ rpm-build

2001-05-24 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Sebastian Dransfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 24 May 2001, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: Quel Qun [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --=-=-= Name: autoconf Relocations: (not relocateable) Version : 2.50

Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.50-1mdk conflicts w/ rpm-build

2001-05-24 Thread R.I.P. Deaddog
On 24 May 2001, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: So where is rpm-build 4.0-30mdk ? [gc@obiwan ~] rpmwatch -p rpm flepied But if you want you can set Conflict: rpm = 4.1 too. Contact flipied why rpm 4.1 was not released?

[Cooker] autoconf-2.50-1mdk conflicts w/ rpm-build

2001-05-23 Thread Quel Qun
Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --=-=-= Name: autoconf Relocations: (not relocateable) Version : 2.50 Vendor: MandrakeSoft Release : 1mdk Build Date: Wed May 23 16:05:31 2001 - version

Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.50-1mdk conflicts w/ rpm-build

2001-05-23 Thread R.I.P. Deaddog
On 23 May 2001, Quel Qun wrote: # rpm -Uvh autoconf-2.50-1mdk.noarch.rpm error: failed dependencies: rpm-build = 4.0-30mdk conflicts with autoconf-2.50-1mdk # rpm -q rpm-build rpm-build-4.0-30mdk From autoconf spec: Conflicts: rpm-build = 4.0-30mdk Abel

[Cooker] Autoconf bugs?

2001-04-05 Thread Steve Fox
I was trying to compile some of the nightly Evolution snapshots and got the below message: creating gal/menus/Makefile creating gal/shortcut-bar/Makefile creating tests/Makefile creating docs/Makefile creating gal.spec creating stamp.h ./config.status: line 600: syntax error: unexpected end of

Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.14.1-9mdk

2000-08-15 Thread Eric MC.D
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: Reinhard Katzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] The tse3 is a package needed by noteedit ! it's in .tar format not from mandrake. The config.h.in in this package mentio. a PACKAGE and VERSION but it also need this from autoconfig

Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.14.1-9mdk

2000-08-15 Thread Reinhard Katzmann
Hi Eric! but I'll do it before I post the spec (and the patch). Guillaume Cottenceau don't believe me when I said that #undef PACKAGE and ..VERSION must be added to acconfig.h (from the autoconfig package) to compile tse3. Without it, it wouldn't compile, asked always about PACKAGE and

Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.14.1-9mdk

2000-08-14 Thread Reinhard Katzmann
Hi! On Sun, Aug 13, 2000 at 05:35:36PM +0200, Eric MC.D wrote: Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: "Eric MC.D" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: "Eric MC.D" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So please add on acconfig.h: Can you send the SRPM for investigation?

Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.14.1-9mdk

2000-08-14 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Reinhard Katzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] The tse3 is a package needed by noteedit ! it's in .tar format not from mandrake. The config.h.in in this package mentio. a PACKAGE and VERSION but it also need this from autoconfig (acconfig.h). So when I added it to acconfig.h

Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.14.1-9mdk

2000-08-14 Thread Eric MC.D
Reinhard Katzmann wrote: Hi! On Sun, Aug 13, 2000 at 05:35:36PM +0200, Eric MC.D wrote: Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: "Eric MC.D" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: "Eric MC.D" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So please add on acconfig.h:

Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.14.1-9mdk

2000-08-14 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Proabably a chmou sucks :-). see carefully the Changelog big man : --=-=-= * Fri Mar 31 2000 Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.13-2mdk - new groups * Mon Mar 06 2000 Chmouel Boudjnah [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.13-1mdk - Back to last 2.13 and

Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.14.1-9mdk

2000-08-14 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Chmouel Boudjnah [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Proabably a chmou sucks :-). see carefully the Changelog big man : --=-=-= * Fri Mar 31 2000 Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.13-2mdk - new groups * Mon Mar 06 2000 Chmouel

Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.14.1-9mdk

2000-08-14 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
"Eric MC.D" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: Reinhard Katzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] The tse3 is a package needed by noteedit ! it's in .tar format not from mandrake. The config.h.in in this package mentio. a PACKAGE and VERSION

Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.14.1-9mdk

2000-08-14 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
"Eric MC.D" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] I have written a spec file for ts3, which I did not yet post because I wait for feedback from Lenny, if noteedit may be I hope so, great prog. integrated or not. I have not changed acconfig.h in this package but I'll do it before I post the

Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.14.1-9mdk

2000-08-13 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
"Eric MC.D" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: "Eric MC.D" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So please add on acconfig.h: /* Define VERSION and PACKLAGE */ #undef PACKAGE #undef VERSION Let me precise my thinking, relatively to the last post: I mean,

Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.14.1-9mdk

2000-08-13 Thread Eric MC.D
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: "Eric MC.D" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: "Eric MC.D" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So please add on acconfig.h: /* Define VERSION and PACKLAGE */ #undef PACKAGE #undef VERSION Let me precise my thinking,

Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.14.1-9mdk

2000-08-13 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
"Eric MC.D" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] [gc@kenobi ~] ls /RPMS/tse* ls: /RPMS/tse*: No such file or directory [gc@kenobi ~] ls /contrib/RPMS/tse* ls: /contrib/RPMS/tse*: No such file or directory The tse3 is a package needed by noteedit ! it's in .tar format not from mandrake.

Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.14.1-9mdk

2000-08-13 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
"Eric MC.D" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: "Eric MC.D" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] [gc@kenobi ~] ls /RPMS/tse* ls: /RPMS/tse*: No such file or directory [gc@kenobi ~] ls /contrib/RPMS/tse* ls: /contrib/RPMS/tse*: No such file or directory

Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.14.1-9mdk

2000-08-12 Thread Eric MC.D
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: "Eric MC.D" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So please add on acconfig.h: /* Define VERSION and PACKLAGE */ #undef PACKAGE #undef VERSION Let me precise my thinking, relatively to the last post: I mean, if you want to have it in your programs, the proper

Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.14.1-9mdk

2000-08-12 Thread Eric MC.D
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: "Eric MC.D" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Have above package installed, but when searching on rpmfind.net found only a lower version ?? not announced on freshmeat; these two ftp sites are unreachable ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/autoconf/

[Cooker] autoconf-2.13-4mdk || automake-1.4-11mdk

2000-07-19 Thread D.Parodi
One of the rpms (the second, I daresay) in the subject brakes compilation of other packages, at least; - gettext-0.10.35-14mdk.src.rpm - rpm-3.0.5-0.29mdk.src.rpm They both blame: ... + make cd . aclocal aclocal: configure.in: 10: macro `AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE' not found in library aclocal:

Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.13-4mdk || automake-1.4-11mdk

2000-07-19 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
"D.Parodi" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: One of the rpms (the second, I daresay) in the subject brakes compilation of other packages, at least; - gettext-0.10.35-14mdk.src.rpm - rpm-3.0.5-0.29mdk.src.rpm They both blame: ... + make cd . aclocal aclocal: configure.in: 10: macro

[Cooker] autoconf fix proposal

2000-07-08 Thread Stefan van der Eijk
This package has a makeinstall problem on my system. I think I fixed it with the .diff file attached. Please integrate into cooker if possible. Thanks!! Stefan van der Eijk PS: the new src.rpm file has been uploaded to /incoming. 9c9 Release: 2mdk --- Release: 3mdk 51,52c51 make