Re: [Cooker] Aurora cosmetic bug

2001-08-07 Thread SI Reasoning
I have no idea why my others don't work and gtk does. I do know that it has to try twice before it will work properly but that might have to do with the file-locking you are talking about. --- Blue Lizard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can get the others to work, as traditional wslib > is my favo

Re: [Cooker] Aurora cosmetic bug

2001-08-07 Thread Blue Lizard
I can get the others to work, as traditional wslib is my favorite. The gtk version requires the creation of some tmp lock file or something as i recall, and thus requires that you have your filesystem mounted rw. This screws up e2fsck and a few others. When filesystem is ro, aurora waits a l

Re: [Cooker] Aurora cosmetic bug

2001-08-07 Thread SI Reasoning
t;-Original Message- > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:cooker-owner@linux- > >>mandrake.com] On Behalf Of Gr§Ûgoire Colbert > >>Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 10:15 PM > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Subject: [Cooker] Aurora cosmetic bug > >

RE: [Cooker] Aurora cosmetic bug

2001-08-07 Thread Borsenkow Andrej
> > What about copying to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aurora maintainer if I'm > not wrong) ? > You are welcome. I personally consider 6 months long enough to declare package no more maintained. I check every new RPM of Aurora of course, and I stubbornly continue to report the same bugs over and over ag

Re: [Cooker] Aurora cosmetic bug

2001-08-07 Thread Grégoire Colbert
What about copying to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aurora maintainer if I'm not wrong) ? Borsenkow Andrej wrote: > Still, this requires somebody to do it. Aurora was not touched (I mean, > really touched) in at least half a year. > > 1. Major - any program that tries to do something interactively at >

RE: [Cooker] Aurora cosmetic bug

2001-08-07 Thread Borsenkow Andrej
> > You mean that nobody will correct this? I thought it was only a matter > of changing a string (which is not translated btw)... Or even better, > above the "change mode" stuff at the left, write "Use TAB to select...". > Still, this requires somebody to do it. Aurora was not touched (I mean,

Re: [Cooker] Aurora cosmetic bug

2001-08-07 Thread Grégoire Colbert
gt; > >>-Original Message- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cooker-owner@linux- >>mandrake.com] On Behalf Of Gr§Ûgoire Colbert >>Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 10:15 PM >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: [Cooker] Aurora cosmetic bug >> >>Hello,

RE: [Cooker] Aurora cosmetic bug

2001-08-06 Thread Borsenkow Andrej
@linux- > mandrake.com] On Behalf Of Gr§Ûgoire Colbert > Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 10:15 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Cooker] Aurora cosmetic bug > > Hello, > > I had to hard-reboot my system after a freeze, and since fsck could not > correct the problems al

[Cooker] Aurora cosmetic bug

2001-08-06 Thread Grégoire Colbert
Hello, I had to hard-reboot my system after a freeze, and since fsck could not correct the problems alone, I went into the "interactive" mode. Having Aurora installed, it took me a moment to understand that to activate the "Yes / No" buttons, I had to use the TAB key (and not the mouse or the