-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frederic Lepied wrote:
>>>The only hack to achieve something like choosing a hostname that will
>>>be valid on your network, is to use zeroconf by setting a hostname in
>>>.local.
>>
>>What about if your server supports Dynamic DNS (ie DHCP server mak
On Tuesday 04 March 2003 09:01 am, Greg Meyer wrote:
> Somehow, running drakconnect changes a setting somewhere, that I cannot (or
> have not been able to) find, that breaks localhost resolution. You'll note
> that an entry has been made to /etc/hosts for the hostname I chose when I
> ran drakconn
On Tuesday 04 March 2003 04:23 am, Buchan Milne wrote:
> Ben Reser wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 07:43:15PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
> >>Sorry, just a query here, did you run 'host `localhost`', or 'host
> >>`hostname`'.
> >>
> >>If 'host `hostname`' resolves, GNOME should work. If it does n
On Tuesday 04 March 2003 04:23 am, Buchan Milne wrote:
> Ben Reser wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 07:43:15PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
> >>Sorry, just a query here, did you run 'host `localhost`', or 'host
> >>`hostname`'.
> >>
> >>If 'host `hostname`' resolves, GNOME should work. If it does n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ben Reser wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 07:43:15PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
>
>>Sorry, just a query here, did you run 'host `localhost`', or 'host
>>`hostname`'.
>>
>>If 'host `hostname`' resolves, GNOME should work. If it does not, GNOME
>>should
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 07:43:15PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
> Sorry, just a query here, did you run 'host `localhost`', or 'host
> `hostname`'.
>
> If 'host `hostname`' resolves, GNOME should work. If it does not, GNOME
> should complain.
That's not really true. Again the host command *ONLY* q
On Monday 03 March 2003 12:43 pm, Buchan Milne wrote:
> Greg Meyer wrote:
> > 2) The only times that host `localhost` resolved successfully was when
>
> static
>
> > addressing was used.
>
> Sorry, just a query here, did you run 'host `localhost`', or 'host
> `hostname`'.
>
> If 'host `hostname`' r
Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Frederic Lepied wrote:
> > Greg Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > First that's the normal behaviour to be able to set the hostname only
> > in static IP mode. You can't choose by yourself a name and have it
> > known by the other hosts on the netwo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Buchan Milne wrote:
>
>>Also, what about drakconnect breaking localhost resolution for GNOME?
>
> I think Fred may have fixed it in the latest initscripts, you may want
> to test.
>
Make that dhcp ...
- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg Meyer wrote:
> On Monday 03 March 2003 12:17 pm, Frederic Lepied wrote:
>
> Why is this possible in prior releases then? I could always set the
host name
> and still obtain a dhcp address. I am making a big issue about this
because
> a lot of pe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frederic Lepied wrote:
> Greg Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> First that's the normal behaviour to be able to set the hostname only
> in static IP mode. You can't choose by yourself a name and have it
> known by the other hosts on the network if t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg Meyer wrote:
>
> 2) The only times that host `localhost` resolved successfully was when
static
> addressing was used.
>
Sorry, just a query here, did you run 'host `localhost`', or 'host
`hostname`'.
If 'host `hostname`' resolves, GNOME should w
On Monday 03 March 2003 12:17 pm, Frederic Lepied wrote:
> First that's the normal behaviour to be able to set the hostname only
> in static IP mode. You can't choose by yourself a name and have it
> known by the other hosts on the network if the IP is given by DHCP.
>
> The only hack to achieve so
Greg Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> With all the discussion on Cooker about broken localhost resolution and the
> new zeroconf setup, I took it upon myself to install Friday night's Cooker
> about 14 times to test various scenarios. Since Buchan has been in the
> center of this discussion
On Sunday 02 March 2003 08:43 am, Greg Meyer wrote:
Somehow, I missed the output for step 10. I added it to output.tgz and
reposted.
>
> http://cybercfo.gkmweb.com/network-test.summary
>
> http://cybercfo.gkmweb.com/output.tgz
--
Greg
With all the discussion on Cooker about broken localhost resolution and the
new zeroconf setup, I took it upon myself to install Friday night's Cooker
about 14 times to test various scenarios. Since Buchan has been in the
center of this discussion, I conferred with him and he suggested I spam
16 matches
Mail list logo
