Ben Reser wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 11:09:50PM -0800, Ben Reser wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 07:51:48PM -0800, Ben Reser wrote:
I'd argue that those people would bother to help triage your bugs
anyway. :)
wouldn't
Blah it was right the first time. Never mind me. :P
~passing B
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 11:09:50PM -0800, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 07:51:48PM -0800, Ben Reser wrote:
> > I'd argue that those people would bother to help triage your bugs
> > anyway. :)
>
> wouldn't
Blah it was right the first time. Never mind me. :P
--
Ben Reser <[EMAIL PRO
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 07:51:48PM -0800, Ben Reser wrote:
> I'd argue that those people would bother to help triage your bugs
> anyway. :)
wouldn't
--
Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://ben.reser.org
"If you're not making any mistakes, you're flat out not trying hard
enough." - Jim Nichols
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 11:23:48AM +0100, Warly wrote:
> I will not split it immediately, at least. If this really does not
> work as this, the list will be splitted.
Okay. Thanks for your hard work getting this figured out!
--
Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://ben.reser.org
"If you're not
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 12:04:07PM +0100, Frederic Crozat wrote:
> I think splitting the list is a really bad idea..
>
> The main idea of putting bugzilla reports on cooker was to ensure all
> cooker folks would be able to help us to triage bugzilla, since it is
> extremely difficult to do it when
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 11:23:48 +0100, Warly wrote:
> Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 04:50:35PM +0100, Warly wrote:
>>> As a consequence, I will try:
>>>
>>> - to fix the duplicate problem so that anyone could reply to a bug in
>>> cooker without caring of the ad
Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 04:50:35PM +0100, Warly wrote:
>> As a consequence, I will try:
>>
>> - to fix the duplicate problem so that anyone could reply to a bug in
>> cooker without caring of the address is responding to. Bugzilla will
>> takes care not to
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 04:50:35PM +0100, Warly wrote:
> As a consequence, I will try:
>
> - to fix the duplicate problem so that anyone could reply to a bug in
> cooker without caring of the address is responding to. Bugzilla will
> takes care not to send duplicates.
>
> - to make it clearer on
Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 02:05:42PM -0800, Ben Reser wrote:
>
> More thinking on this:
>
> New bug reports go to cooker... everything thereafter goes to a separate
> bug list. If you want to see all the bug discussion you subscribe to
> the bug list. If you
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 10:58:18AM +0100, Warly wrote:
> I am still wondering. Look at cooker, 90 % of posts are bug reporting. If all
> the bugs go to bugzilla, why then not just remove cooker mailing list ? As
> a consequence the very only way to report will be bugzilla.
I believe you answered y
Le Dimanche 8 Décembre 2002 10:58, Warly a écrit :
> Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 05:48:41PM +0100, Warly wrote:
> >> OK I will have to investigate on this way.
> >
> > c) Disallow bug reports on the cooker list. If we allow people to post
> > bug reports on th
Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 05:48:41PM +0100, Warly wrote:
>> OK I will have to investigate on this way.
>
> c) Disallow bug reports on the cooker list. If we allow people to post
> bug reports on this list then we're back where we were before. People
> end up
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 05:48:41PM +0100, Warly wrote:
> OK I will have to investigate on this way.
:)
If you do it like that... a couple of things would be nice:
a) Make the cooker mailing list filter out messages that are CC'ed to
a bug mailing list. Right now we're getting some duplicates be
Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 02:05:42PM -0800, Ben Reser wrote:
>> It's going to be much easier to move the bug email (which is being
>> generated by bugzilla) to a different list than to get people to have
>> discussions on a different list. I advocated a cooke
--- Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 02:41:13PM -0800, David
> Walser wrote:
> > I suppose that would work, although it'd be a lot
> more
> > work adding yourself to CC's all the time. It
> might
> > be easier if the headers got set so that when you
> > reply to one o
See I'm all for having a seperation of bugzilla and cooker lists, only
because there are interesting cooker discussions that occur, however I
do not care to see all the little status updates for every bugzilla
entry. If this form of seperation were posible, sending only the
introductory bug report
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 02:41:13PM -0800, David Walser wrote:
> I suppose that would work, although it'd be a lot more
> work adding yourself to CC's all the time. It might
> be easier if the headers got set so that when you
> reply to one of those bugzilla e-mails it goes to the
> bug instead of
--- Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > to any list (right now we have some people,
> including Mandrake
> > employees, sending their replies to the list,
> while bugzilla will pick
> > them up you end up with 2 copies of the message
> when bugzilla reposts it
> > to the list). People shouldn
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 02:05:42PM -0800, Ben Reser wrote:
> It's going to be much easier to move the bug email (which is being
> generated by bugzilla) to a different list than to get people to have
> discussions on a different list. I advocated a cooker-bugs list for the
> bugzilla mail... All
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 12:01:57PM -0700, Vincent Danen wrote:
> There should then be a cooker-discuss list or something that is
> strictly for cooker discussion and *no* bug reports. Keep cooker as
> the place to discuss bugs and receive bug reports.
>
> Of course, the usefulness of cooker-dis
On Thursday, December 5, 2002, at 03:27 AM, Buchan Milne wrote:
[..]
If this policy isn't about to change, please let me know so I can
discontinue my subscription. At this rate I'm better off just
checking
bugzilla every few days to see what's going on. It will save on my
bandwidth.
I don't
On Thursday 05 December 2002 10:27, Buchan Milne wrote:
> Of course, there are some things that could be done to resolve Neils
> issues:
>
> 1)He could filter his mail so bugzilla mail went to a seperate folder
> than cooker mail
>
I did this, and it works just great, no need to subcribe to YAML.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vincent Danen wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, December 4, 2002, at 08:37 PM, Nelson Bartley wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure if this has been brought up before but I'm going to ask.
>>
>> Is it absolutely necessary to have all bugzilla updates sent to the
>> cooker l
On Wednesday, December 4, 2002, at 08:37 PM, Nelson Bartley wrote:
I'm not sure if this has been brought up before but I'm going to ask.
Is it absolutely necessary to have all bugzilla updates sent to the
cooker list? The reason I ask is I currently keep a local copy of all
messages I've receiv
Hi Guys,
I'm not sure if this has been brought up before but I'm going to ask.
Is it absolutely necessary to have all bugzilla updates sent to the
cooker list? The reason I ask is I currently keep a local copy of all
messages I've received on the cooker list for at least the last year (I
had almo
At 11:26 AM 12/3/02 +0100, you (Warly) wrote:
>Yes you are right some more detailed doc should be produced.
>
>However I sent some mails some days ago, look into cooker
>archives, to explain the mail interface basics.
IMO references to archives don't quite cut it when it is
about *guidelines*.
At 09:41 PM 12/2/02 -0500, you (Brian J. Murrell) wrote:
>
>I am just tired of going to the effort to do the bugzilla thing and
>nobody following up (to vote)
(...)
>You don't have to use the web-pages! There is a
>"reply-by-email" interface that allows you to vote among other things.
Very nice
David Walser wrote:
> --- Warly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Can we make it so that bugs that are marked as
> > RESOLVED|INVALID or
> > > do not continue to send email to the list.
> > Whoever changed the state
> > > should still be receiving emails
--- Warly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Can we make it so that bugs that are marked as
> RESOLVED|INVALID or
> > do not continue to send email to the list.
> Whoever changed the state
> > should still be receiving emails on it... so if it
> needs to be c
Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can we make it so that bugs that are marked as RESOLVED|INVALID or
> do not continue to send email to the list. Whoever changed the state
> should still be receiving emails on it... so if it needs to be changed
> they can handle it.
You want that closed
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 09:14:08PM -0800, Quel Qun wrote:
> Hmm, maybe the person who closed it was wrong...
Problem is a lot of these non-cooker bug report people keep going on
about their bug... Which keeps filling the list with it...
But yeah I can see the problem with wrongly closed bugs.
On Sun, 2002-12-01 at 19:33, Ben Reser wrote:
> Can we make it so that bugs that are marked as RESOLVED|INVALID or
> do not continue to send email to the list. Whoever changed the state
> should still be receiving emails on it... so if it needs to be changed
> they can handle it.
>
Hmm, maybe
Can we make it so that bugs that are marked as RESOLVED|INVALID or
do not continue to send email to the list. Whoever changed the state
should still be receiving emails on it... so if it needs to be changed
they can handle it.
--
Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://ben.reser.org
"If you're
The most usefull groups are canconfirm and editbugs,
canconfirm made you able to switch a bug from unconfirmed to new state
editbugs allow you, mainly, to invalidate a bug.
You can ask me to be put in those groups.
--
Warly
I changed ISP's since creating my Bugzilla account. Neither "account
settings" nor "email settings" provide a place to change email address
for the account. How is this done?
--
"The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom. . . ." Proverbs 8:13
NIV
Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409
Felix
Commented result of the help command sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Available commands for bug processing (@COMMAND=value):
These commands can be included in reply to a bug. Normal text
will be added as bug comment, and command such as
@command=value will be processed.
Some command are limited to
Le Lundi 25 Novembre 2002 10:56, Warly a écrit :
> Pascal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > If I take the following bug report information, I am unable to know which
> > package / component this bug report is related to.
> >
> > Wouldn't it be great if bugzilla could indicate something like
> > packa
Pascal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If I take the following bug report information, I am unable to know which
> package / component this bug report is related to.
>
> Wouldn't it be great if bugzilla could indicate something like
> package/component:
> before the Version: v
If I take the following bug report information, I am unable to know which
package / component this bug report is related to.
Wouldn't it be great if bugzilla could indicate something like
package/component:
before the Version: v
line in the posted emails ?
:°
Pasca
Warly wrote:
> 9.0 is (likely to be) finished.
> Thanks to you all for your precious help.
> During last 6 months period, and especially in the last beta period, some
> of you give some advice/critic/flame regarding Mandrakesoft development
> process.
> It is now the right time to debrief a
The Mandrakelinux page
http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/90rc.php3 says,
>To obtain a BugZilla account, send an email to
>'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with "canpostabug" in the body of
>your message. Note: you must first create a BugZilla account if you
>do not have one yet.
So I did that, and got the
change in functionality. Hummm...
>
>
> >From: Greg Sarsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To: Cooker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: [Cooker] bugzilla @ qa.mandrakesoft.com
> >Date: 20 Mar 2002 09:05:52 -0500
> >
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [Cooker] bugzilla @ qa.mandrakesoft.com
>Date: 20 Mar 2002 09:05:52 -0500
>
>Okay I have a username and password for qa.mandrakesoft.com bugzilla but
>I'm not allowed to post a bug. Why would a password be issued if you
>can't post a bug? Do
Okay I have a username and password for qa.mandrakesoft.com bugzilla but
I'm not allowed to post a bug. Why would a password be issued if you
can't post a bug? Don't understand the need after getting a
password/username to email [EMAIL PROTECTED] asking to be able to post
a bug.
If you follow t
Leon Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Friday 08 March 2002 01:44, David Walluck wrote:
>> Have the bug report (URL) as part of this
>> message. Since bugzilla is restricted, one still doesn't have a nice way
>> to query if a bug is reported if they are a newbie.
>
> This is kind of a newbi
On Friday 08 March 2002 01:44, David Walluck wrote:
> Have the bug report (URL) as part of this
> message. Since bugzilla is restricted, one still doesn't have a nice way
> to query if a bug is reported if they are a newbie.
This is kind of a newbie question, does Bugzilla have a public-read-only
Does anyone else have problems with Konqueror freezing when visiting the
advanced query page at Mandrake's bugzilla? I do with Konqueror 2.2.1 on
Mandrake 8.1.
--
John Kintree
4043 Delor Street
St. Louis, MO 63116
314-351-7454
le mar 27-11-2001 à 17:34, Yura Gusev a écrit :
>
> Sorry for offtopic but where is bugzilla on .mandrake.com?
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com
--
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/linux_wizard/index.html
-
Chagrin: On a vu l'homme-araignée ce matin. Les nuls
Sorry for offtopic but where is bugzilla on .mandrake.com?
--
11:32am up 42 days, 29 min, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
__
| / \ |Iouri Goussev// \\
\_\\ //_/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] _\\()//_
.'/()\'.
Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> I might have to succumb to the irony of having to use a Windows-based browser
> to use Mandrake's bugzilla :p
Try with Opera 5, it seems to work :
http://www.opera.com
Grégoire
On Thursday 06 September 2001 9:32 pm, you wrote:
> Michel Alexandre Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Bugzilla (qa.mandrakesoft.com) seems to have been down for the past few
> > days - rather at an awkward moment, given that beta3 is imminent?
>
> try https
The problem is that
andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Op 06 Sep 2001 21:02:49 +0200, Chmouel Boudjnah schreef:
> > Don Head <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Any particular reason? I'm just kinda curious, as I've
> > > never heard of anyone saying not to do that before. Some
> > > kind of security issue I'm
Op 06 Sep 2001 21:02:49 +0200, Chmouel Boudjnah schreef:
> Don Head <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Any particular reason? I'm just kinda curious, as I've
> > never heard of anyone saying not to do that before. Some
> > kind of security issue I'm not familiar with?
>
> they don't allow any r
Don Head <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Any particular reason? I'm just kinda curious, as I've
> never heard of anyone saying not to do that before. Some
> kind of security issue I'm not familiar with?
they don't allow any request to a non crypted port from outside (that
stupid i know but i'm n
> > Bugzilla went live. Is it possible that the web admin
> > could add a simple redirect on
> > http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/ that points to
>
> only a problem of our security people doen't allow us to do that :-(.
Any particular reason? I'm just kinda curious, as I've
never heard of anyone say
Don Head <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bugzilla went live. Is it possible that the web admin
> could add a simple redirect on
> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/ that points to
only a problem of our security people doen't allow us to do that :-(.
On Thu Sep 06, 2001 at 12:41:20PM -0500, Don Head wrote:
> >> Bugzilla (qa.mandrakesoft.com) seems to have been down for
> >> the past few days
> >> - rather at an awkward moment, given that beta3 is imminent?
> >
> > try https
>
> I've noticed this has been a problem ever since Mdk's
> Bugzi
>> Bugzilla (qa.mandrakesoft.com) seems to have been down for
>> the past few days
>> - rather at an awkward moment, given that beta3 is imminent?
>
> try https
I've noticed this has been a problem ever since Mdk's
Bugzilla went live. Is it possible that the web admin
could add a simple redir
Michel Alexandre Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> Bugzilla (qa.mandrakesoft.com) seems to have been down for the past few days
> - rather at an awkward moment, given that beta3 is imminent?
try https
--
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
Hello,
Bugzilla (qa.mandrakesoft.com) seems to have been down for the past few days
- rather at an awkward moment, given that beta3 is imminent?
Wanted to check the progress on DrakNet; Internet Connection Sharing is very
buggy in 8.0 freq3, gabber refuses to start up too, complaining of a mis
Why is the bugzilla submission thing for cooker so slow?
-Chris
C'est réponse au poteau au poteau ' incorrect ':
"if there was a way to mark a question here as invalid I would
sure mark this one"
You know you have been using Bugzilla too long when...
you start trying to deal with Real Life the same
way you would a bug report :-)
Girlfriend whinin
As subject
cu and good work...;o)
--
Franco Silvestro
c/o CeSIA - Alma Mater Studiorum - Universita' di Bologna
Current Linux uptime: 11 days 1 hour 39 minutes.
--
Thu Jan 11 20:55:23 CET 2001
--
Linux gattosil.alma.
Fresh cooker full expert install developer :
[root@gattosil1 RPMS]# [root@gattosil1 cooker]# cat VERSION
Linux-Mandrake Cooker-i586 20001128 19:17
[root@gattosil1 RPMS]# rpm -Uvh bugzilla-2.11-1mdk.noarch.rpm
error: failed dependencies:
perl-Chart-0.99c is needed by bugzilla-2.11-1mdk
I wrote:
>
> I'm trying to post a bug and the only respnse I get is "Posting Bug - One moment
> please..."
Never mind... forgot to enter a summary. I'll bug bugzilla...
Pierre
I'm trying to post a bug and the only respnse I get is "Posting Bug - One moment
please..."
Pierre
neognomic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> --- Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I'd like to submit some new bugs, ...
> DELETED>
> > PS: I put Charles in the recp. list.
> >
> > Alexander Skwar
> > --
>
> Yep, it's down too. I can't even load the main page at
> https:
--- Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'd like to submit some new bugs, ...
DELETED>
> PS: I put Charles in the recp. list.
>
> Alexander Skwar
> --
Yep, it's down too. I can't even load the main page at
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/dimension/cgi-bin/index.cgi .
Sure hope
Hi!
I'd like to submit some new bugs, or much rather I'd like not to, but
Well, anyway, after clicking on "Submit a Bug" and "Login", Netscape stops
loading the page. Looking in the source code of the page, I see this at the
bottom:
Content-type: text/html
Software error:
select user_g
concerns about hosting the Mandrake Cooker Bugzilla database off-site.
I'll toss my hat in the ring in favor of using Bugzilla to track Cooker
issues! Let me know how I can be of service, and I'll gladly contribute.
FYI: I maintain the Bugzilla documentation. I will have a new versio
101 - 170 of 170 matches
Mail list logo
