"Hoyt" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So if you were to create a shell script to do this named, for example,
"whatrpmprovides", what would it look like? (I'm a writer, not a
programmer).
there is urpmi that takes care of dependencies.
have a look at /var/lib/urpmi/depslist
also look at urpmf
"Hoyt" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nothing is more annoying than to try and intall an rpm and have it fail
because of a dependency issue, only to 1)have =that= rpm fial because of
another dependency issue, or 2) have the dependency be some library
buried in an rpm that isn't easily
"Hoyt" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nothing is more annoying than to try and intall an rpm and have it fail
because of a dependency issue, only to 1)have =that= rpm fial because of
another dependency issue, or 2) have the dependency
you are saying because package foo requires package
:~Nothing is more annoying than to try and intall an rpm and have it fail because of
:a dependency issue, only to 1)have =that= rpm fial because of another dependency
:issue, or 2) have the dependency be some library buried in an rpm that isn't easily
:discernable. The program ezrpm address
- Original Message -
From: "Geoffrey Lee" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2000 9:12 AM
Subject: RE: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - Address dependency issue better
you are saying because package foo requires package bar so you must also
- Original Message -
From: "Guillaume Cottenceau" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2000 8:45 AM
Subject: Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - Address dependency issue better
"Hoyt" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nothing is more
you are saying because package foo requires package bar so you must also
download package bar to satisfy pacakge foo right ??
just use rpm --force ...e.g. i don't insall the mandrake_desk
package becuse
i don't ened it so i use --force for wmaker. it's only in some
cases that
On Fri, 26 May 2000, Hoyt wrote:
just use rpm --force ...e.g. i don't insall the mandrake_desk package becuse
i don't ened it so i use --force for wmaker. it's only in some cases that
you should use --force anyway.
--nodeps is less ... forcing.
I often do just that =if= I understand
- Original Message -
From: "Geoffrey Lee" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2000 12:02 PM
Subject: RE: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - Address dependency issue
better
though i must admit that it's a litle hard to understand the
- Original Message -
From: "Stephane Gourichon" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2000 11:55 AM
Subject: Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - Address dependency issue
better
On Fri, 26 May 2000, Hoyt wrote:
But that's a job to extend the rp
Nothing is more annoying than to try and intall an rpm and have it fail because of a
dependency issue, only to 1)have =that= rpm fial because of another dependency issue,
or 2) have the dependency be some library buried in an rpm that isn't easily
discernable. The program ezrpm address some of
11 matches
Mail list logo
