On Saturday 16 August 2003 03:58 pm, Jay DeKing wrote:
On Friday 15 August 2003 4:17 am, Gregoire Favre honored me with this
communique:
Hello,
I have installed the new GRUB yesterday, and I didn't notice a problem,
know at boot, all I can see is: GRUB.
I had the same problem. Neither
On Friday 15 August 2003 4:17 am, Gregoire Favre honored me with this
communique:
Hello,
I have installed the new GRUB yesterday, and I didn't notice a problem,
know at boot, all I can see is: GRUB.
I had the same problem. Neither of my boot floppies worked either (yes, they
have the
Hello,
I have installed the new GRUB yesterday, and I didn't notice a problem,
know at boot, all I can see is: GRUB.
And from the drakboot:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] RPM]# drakboot
FATAL: Module floppy not found.
FATAL: Module floppy not found.
FATAL: Module floppy not found.
FATAL: Module floppy not
If someone is interested, i could setup a grub_hd.img floppy image
(~120K) that would propose:
title Mandrake is on the first drive partition #1
root (hd0,0)
kernel /isolinux/alt0/vmlinuz vga=788
initrd /isolinux/alt0/all.rdz
title Mandrake is on the first drive partition #2
root (hd0,1)
When one select the grub menu instead of lilo, this menu.lst is written :
title floppy
root (fd0)
chainloader +1
title windows
root (hd2,0)
map (0x81) (0x80)
map (0x80) (0x81)
makeactive
chainloader +1
And the map (0x81) (0x80) command doesn't work : grub doesn't boot, and grub
shell is
Stéphane Teletchéa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And the map (0x81) (0x80) command doesn't work : grub doesn't boot, and grub
shell is invocated instead of booting the windows partition.
I manually change it and it works (but as it windows sees two partitions).
title windows
map (hd2)
i heve a nvidia tnt2 32mb card, and i'm using mandrake82 ( with some
cooker updates ) and two days ago i switched from lilo to grub...
and grub works without problems...in text mode..
bye
gabor
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 02:28:25PM -0400, Denis Pelletier wrote:
Hello,
Is anyone using grub
Hello,
Is anyone using grub with an NVIDIA video card? Is it working correctly?
On my laptop, grub is VERY slow at drawing the screen when I boot. It
takes 3-4 seconds to draw the screen and about one second to change the
cursos from one entry to the next. The video card of my laptop is an
I think I saw the same when i used grub a few months ago. Very slow drawing of the
menu.
But then, my NVIDIA system is strange anyway. All kernels, exept when compiled with
VGA 16 or RIVA framebuffer do not show _anything at all_ on screen. Lilo shows up ok,
even in graphical mode, than it
# sh installsh
GRUB version 091 (640K lower / 3072K upper memory)
[ Minimal BASH-like line editing is supported For the first word, TAB
lists possible command completions Anywhere else TAB lists the
possible
completions of a device/filename ]
grub install
Quel Qun [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
grub install (hd1,4)/boot/grub/stage1 d (hd0) (hd1,4)/boot/grub/stage2
p (hdgrub install (hd1,4)/boot/grub/stage1 d (hd0)
(hd1,4)/boot/grub/stage2 p (hd1grub install (hd1,4)/boot/grub/stage1 d
(hd0) (hd1,4)/boot/grub/stage2 p (hd1grub install
On Sun, 2002-03-03 at 01:47, Pixel wrote:
Quel Qun [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
grub install (hd1,4)/boot/grub/stage1 d (hd0) (hd1,4)/boot/grub/stage2
p (hdgrub install (hd1,4)/boot/grub/stage1 d (hd0)
(hd1,4)/boot/grub/stage2 p (hd1grub install (hd1,4)/boot/grub/stage1 d
(hd0)
Quel Qun [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 2002-03-03 at 01:47, Pixel wrote:
Quel Qun [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
grub install (hd1,4)/boot/grub/stage1 d (hd0) (hd1,4)/boot/grub/stage2
p (hdgrub install (hd1,4)/boot/grub/stage1 d (hd0)
(hd1,4)/boot/grub/stage2 p (hd1grub install
2 We can't use them at the same time
? We can not use them both ?
have you tried having 2-3 Linux distros ( or installations)+ FreeBSD on
the same mashine
can you install lilo on 2 places ? or on second drive
why not lilo - /dev/hda - lin-distroes,grub
grub -
On Mon, 2001-09-17 at 16:51, Jay DeKing wrote:
2 We can't use them at the same time
? We can not use them both ?
have you tried having 2-3 Linux distros ( or installations)+ FreeBSD on
the same mashine
can you install lilo on 2 places ? or on second drive
why
Yura Gusev wrote:
On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Vincent Meyer wrote:
yeah, we really need grub. While I use Lilo with the pretty screen
on my desktop, it doesn't display correctly on my laptop, and I prefer
on that machine to have grub. (yes, I know there is a text based lilo.
On the machine the
On Sunday 16 September 2001 02:33 am, you wrote:
Yura Gusev wrote:
On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Vincent Meyer wrote:
yeah, we really need grub. While I use Lilo with the pretty screen
on my desktop, it doesn't display correctly on my laptop, and I prefer
on that machine to have grub. (yes, I know
On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Hoyt wrote:
I think they(lilo and grub) need to provide bootloader so they can't be
installed at the same time. And basesystem need to depend on bootloader
so you need to install one of them.
And I am happy having both so I can play with both.
Having both is a
Yura Gusev wrote:
On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Hoyt wrote:
I think they(lilo and grub) need to provide bootloader so they can't be
installed at the same time. And basesystem need to depend on bootloader
so you need to install one of them.
And I am happy having both so I can play with both.
Having
On 16 Sep 2001, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
Do we really need grub? I think lilo works just fine.
grub is better but less friendly.
OK if user wants grub thats ok. But i dont need 2 bootloaders installed by
default. (basesystem depends on lilo and grub)
--
8:46pm up 22 days, 9:50, 3
yeah, we really need grub. While I use Lilo with the pretty screen
on my desktop, it doesn't display correctly on my laptop, and I prefer
on that machine to have grub. (yes, I know there is a text based lilo.
On the machine the pretty one works on, I like it, and so do my kids)
Vinny
On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Vincent Meyer wrote:
yeah, we really need grub. While I use Lilo with the pretty screen
on my desktop, it doesn't display correctly on my laptop, and I prefer
on that machine to have grub. (yes, I know there is a text based lilo.
On the machine the pretty one works on,
I agree. I don't know any reason why both are required.
V.
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
Yura Gusev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do we really need grub? I think lilo works just fine.
grub is better but less friendly.
agreed. better in some respects as far as say, command line editing,
less need for repeated rebuilding, etc. Too bad it recently
Cannot find a boot loader, you may have to see why detectloader has
problems or specify via the command line.
# detectloader
no bootloader on MBR, trying partitions!
=-=
kk1
_
Free email with personality! Over 200 domains!
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 09:45:47PM -0400, salane wrote:
rpm -q grub
grub-0.5.96.1-8mdk
It won't install by using control panel
[..]
Error 31: File is not sector aligned
It is not a grub problem but a ControlCenter bug..
it has been "fixed" by disabling the feature the time to correct the
rpm -q grub
grub-0.5.96.1-8mdk
It won't install by using control panel
Use of uninitialized value in subroutine entry at
/usr/X11R6/bin/DrakConf.real line 199, VERS line 1.
test 1
1
Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) at
/usr/X11R6/bin/DrakConf.real
line 454, VERS line 1.
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, salane wrote:
grub /dev/hda7
grub
setup --stage2=/boot/grub/stage2 --prefix=/grub (hd0,6)
Checking if "/grub/stage1" exists... yes
Checking if "/grub/stage2" exists... yes
Checking if "/grub/reiserfs_stage1_5" exists... yes
Running "install
Hi!
Is it right that the only available documentation for grub in
grub-0.5.96.1-8mdk are the info/man pages? I've also installed the -doc
subpackage, but this only contains:
/usr/share/doc/grub-doc-0.5.96.1
/usr/share/doc/grub-doc-0.5.96.1/BUGS
/usr/share/doc/grub-doc-0.5.96.1/ChangeLog
Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi!
Is it right that the only available documentation for grub in
grub-0.5.96.1-8mdk are the info/man pages? I've also installed the -doc
subpackage, but this only contains:
/usr/share/doc/grub-doc-0.5.96.1
So sprach Ryan Little am Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 12:20:50AM -0500:
Why is Grub installed mandatory? If you try to unistall it it says it's
rewuired by basesystemthat's great but I use good ol liloperhaps
this dependency could be romoved.question though...since I'm using
LILO can I
This issue has been brought up before, and somebody (I forgot the name)
suggested that basesystem requires a virtual package called "bootloader"
or something like that instead of requiring both lilo and grub. And then
nobody followed up. Period.
Abel Cheung
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Ryan Little
On 03.29 R.I.P. Deaddog wrote:
This issue has been brought up before, and somebody (I forgot the name)
suggested that basesystem requires a virtual package called "bootloader"
or something like that instead of requiring both lilo and grub. And then
nobody followed up. Period.
It was me
- Original Message -
From: "J . A . Magallon" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 4:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Cooker] GRUB...Why is it a dependency of base system (i.e why
can't it be removed?)
On 03.29 R.I.P. Deaddog wrote:
This issu
Not sure about macro thing, but to forcefully remove a package, hvae to
use:
rpm -e --nodeps
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Ryan Little wrote:
Linux werewolf 2.4.2-ac28 #1 SMP Thu Mar 29 16:41:17 CEST 2001 i686
Wish I could, take a look at this :(
[root@littlebox /root]# rpm -e
On 03.30 Ryan Little wrote:
Wish I could, take a look at this :(
[root@littlebox /root]# rpm -e --force grub
Macro %_install_langs has empty body
rpm: only installation, upgrading, rmsource and rmspec may be forced
p... I will never get used to which one in used in each case.
Try with
Why is Grub installed mandatory? If you try to
unistall it it says it's rewuired by basesystemthat's great but I use good
ol liloperhaps this dependency could be romoved.question though...since
I'm using LILO can I safely force a remove on GRUB?
Ryan
I upgraded to the grub-0.5.96.1-1mdk release yesterday and discovered that
it's fatal. Grub reports an incompability between stage1 and stage2. Ignore
or overlook the warning message the first time around and you'll find
yourself with an unbootable system.
To protect yourself, save the
On Monday 11 December 2000 06:32, you wrote:
I upgraded to the grub-0.5.96.1-1mdk release yesterday and discovered that
it's fatal. Grub reports an incompability between stage1 and stage2.
I just did a strings on stage2 to try and remember the exact error message,
and I think it was: "Bad
Ed Wilts [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I upgraded to the grub-0.5.96.1-1mdk release yesterday and discovered that
it's fatal. Grub reports an incompability between stage1 and stage2. Ignore
oops, forgotten to call it in %post, should be ok in grub-0.5.96-1.2mdk:
- add a call to
Hi, I used grub from 7.2 (grub-0.5.95-7mdk).
I have 3 reiserfs part on hda and another ext2fs on hdc.
I want to use grub for booting mandrake on hda and debian on hdc. But as
grub use reiserfs_stage1.5, it can't handle ext2fs.
I tried to install reiserfs-grub on hda and ext2fs-grub on hdc and
Thomas Poindessous [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi, I used grub from 7.2 (grub-0.5.95-7mdk).
I have 3 reiserfs part on hda and another ext2fs on hdc.
I want to use grub for booting mandrake on hda and debian on hdc. But as
grub use reiserfs_stage1.5, it can't handle ext2fs.
I tried to install
Thomas Poindessous wrote:
I want to use grub for booting mandrake on hda and debian on hdc. But as
grub use reiserfs_stage1.5, it can't handle ext2fs.
I tried to install reiserfs-grub on hda and ext2fs-grub on hdc and
chainloader from hda to hdc during the boot, but it doesn't work.
maybe,
Peter Ruskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Still not on cooker list at Thu Aug 24 04:31:55 BST 2000, so here's a
FMY what is BST ?
--
Guillaume Cottenceau -- Distribution Developer for MandrakeSoft
http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Peter Ruskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Still not on cooker list at Thu Aug 24 04:31:55 BST 2000, so here's a
FMY what is BST ?
i believe it include all this city :
(chmou@cassini)[share/zoneinfo]-% grep -riw BST *
Binary file America/Nome
On Thu, 24 Aug 2000, Pixel wrote:
Peter Ruskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
BTW, lilo-0.21.5-1mdk.i586.rpm on Cooker gives a nice menu, but it
installs /boot/boot.b as a link to boot-menu.b, so drakboot can't make you
a boot floppy - it can't open boot.b. "Progress means
On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Peter Ruskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Still not on cooker list at Thu Aug 24 04:31:55 BST 2000, so here's a
FMY what is BST ?
British Summer Time, which is GMT + 1
--
--
Peter
On Thu, 24 Aug 2000, you wrote:
Peter Ruskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BTW, lilo-0.21.5-1mdk.i586.rpm on Cooker gives a nice menu, but it
installs /boot/boot.b as a link to boot-menu.b, so drakboot can't make
you a boot floppy - it can't open boot.b. "Progress means deterioation."
I
Franco Silvestro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
mkbootdisk don't understand that symlink, I remove symlink boot.b and I
cool, fixed :)
Still not on cooker list at Thu Aug 24 04:31:55 BST 2000, so here's a
repost. Hope this doesn't create another darned duplicate.
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: [Cooker] GRUB not working with SCSI boot disk
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 00:14:45 +0100
From: Peter Ruskin [EMAIL
Peter Ruskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Thanks Pixel, tried that. It's a GRUB bug. /usr/doc/grub-doc-0.5.94/BUGS:
- GRUB hangs up when accessing a disk via Adaptec AIC-7880
SCSI-controller in LBA mode. It is unknown if this is due to GRUB or
the SCSI BIOS. For now, you need
Peter Ruskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I quite liked GRUB, but since I got a new ATA66 disk and Promise
controller, repartitioned and used my IBM SCSI disk to boot from, it
doesn't work - all I get is the message `First stage install ...'
LILO works fine. I've tried different versions of
Peter Ruskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--Boundary-=_XrJmOWFrxsjyBldbEFSArCBynEcd
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi cookers,
I quite liked GRUB, but since I got a new ATA66 disk and Promise
controller, repartitioned and used my IBM SCSI disk to boot
Does anyone know if it is possible to make Grub boot off of a CD?
Ta
Alex
Alex Boag-Munroe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does anyone know if it is possible to make Grub boot off of a CD?
booting of a cd needs el torito. that is emulation of a floppy. see mkisofs for
more.
it with?
Help would be greatly appreciated
Thanks
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Pixel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 July 2000 3:29
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Cooker] Grub
Alex Boag-Munroe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does anyone know if it is possible to make Grub boot off
Alex Boag-Munroe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I would like, is to have a bootable CD with a Grub menu. It then gives
the option whether to continue to boot off the CD, or boot off the hard
drive (Like the Windows 98/2000 CDs do...)
If I cannot do it with grub, does anyone know ANYTHING
Didn't explain what I wanted.
What I would like, is to have a bootable CD with a Grub menu. It then
gives
the option whether to continue to boot off the CD, or boot off the hard
drive (Like the Windows 98/2000 CDs do...)
(with 'c')
and try command "displaymem"
also, look at the /proc/cmdline booting with lilo and grub.
Here it is:
Using the current cooker grub-0.5.94-9mdk, /proc/cmdline shows 'mem=66551K
root=/dev/hda5'
grub displaymem
EISA Memory BIOS Interface is present
Address Map BIOS
Hi,
Can anyone explain to me why the system boots with 128MB of RAM with lilo and only
64MB with grub?
Everything seems to work fine when I specify mem=128m, but that's still strange.
Mandrakely,
=-=
kk1
(Following lines are not from me).
--
Linux est libre, et vous ?
Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quel Qun wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone explain to me why the system boots with 128MB of RAM with lilo and only
64MB with grub?
Everything seems to work fine when I specify mem=128m, but that's still strange.
Mandrakely,
(please understand this is a personal
"David Foresman" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is drakx going to go back to lilo at any point in the future?
at the moment, it configures both. I'm playing with grub, so sometimes it ends
up with grub sometimes with lilo. In expert, there'll be a choice between the 2.
anyway, as both are
I quickly looked through the list archive but
didn't find any informat.
Is there anywhere to get information on how to
setup grub? i went to thier web page, and all they had was a doc.
Is drakx going to go back to lilo at any point in
the future?
At the very least there should be an
type info grub after you have installed it...
You also have a documentation directory in the grub package...
/M
On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, David Foresman wrote:
I quickly looked through the list archive but didn't find any informat.
Is there anywhere to get information on how to setup grub? i
If anyone is interested, I built a rpm for grub 0.5.93.1 (on a redhat
6.0 box,
but it works fine on an helios box). Just tell me where to upload it.
It just contains the files, no automatic configuration. Read
/usr/doc/grub../grub.ps
Bruno
- Original Message -
From: Pixel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gary Lawrence Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 1999 9:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Cooker] Re: Cooker Boot Glitches
Gary Lawrence Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
GRUB?
the hurd boot
- Original Message -
From: Chmouel Boudjnah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 1999 10:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Cooker] GRUB
"Hoyt" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just out of curiosity, how is your first name pronounced? I see it
taken
On 22 Dec 1999, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
"Hoyt" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have to learn how to count from zero? 8 )
well just because it's a different structure of linux.
Isn't it a little late to be working Chmouel?
humm sound like i should go to sleep :), but well a lot of work
68 matches
Mail list logo
