David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Given that, it seems to me the best thing for services
we don't want enabled by default on installation, is
to just have them not run _post_service in the SPEC
file. They'll get chkconfig --add run when they're
enabled, and they don't lose the list of
--- Pixel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
maybe we could disable nfs by default, agreed.
for the others, i don't know :-/
if you are right, I do agree they should not be
running by default,
and it's a bug. And you should report to the
David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
% grep chkconfig /etc/init.d/*
...
/etc/init.d/portmap:# chkconfig: 345 11 89
...
/etc/init.d/ypserv:# chkconfig: - 16 84
...
- portmap will run by default at runlevels 3, 4 and
5
- ypserv will not run by default (notice the -)
--- Pixel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
% grep chkconfig /etc/init.d/*
...
/etc/init.d/portmap:# chkconfig: 345 11 89
...
/etc/init.d/ypserv:# chkconfig: - 16 84
...
- portmap will run by default at runlevels 3, 4
and
5
--- Pixel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
maybe we could disable nfs by default, agreed.
for the others, i don't know :-/
if you are right, I do agree they should not be
running by default,
and it's a bug. And you should report to the
On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 18:09, Buchan Milne wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- only services that have a useful default
configuration are on by
default
Wrong, apcupsd, dhcpd, jabber, named, nfs, ntpd, smb,
ypbind, and
--- Mark Piper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And perhaps we should have LISa AT LEAST LISTED in
the services, if not
on by default, so that an inexperienced user will be
able to see
something aside from an error message when clicking
on Konqueror's LAN
browser.
It has a useful default. Turn
On Friday 16 August 2002 05:58 pm, David Walser wrote:
--- Mark Piper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And perhaps we should have LISa AT LEAST LISTED in
the services, if not
on by default, so that an inexperienced user will be
able to see
something aside from an error message when clicking
http://lisa-home.sourceforge.net/src/lisa.mandrake
has init scripts for lisa. This is mandrake specfic (though it was written for
8.0)
Thre are also init scripts for redhat (7.2, 7.3) and suse (7.1 )listed at
http://lisa-home.sourceforge.net/download.html
Perhaps Madrake could include this
David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- only services that have a useful default
configuration are on by
default
Wrong, apcupsd, dhcpd, jabber, named, nfs, ntpd, smb,
ypbind, and maybe mysql and ldap (can't remember) are
on by default if you install them, and they need to be
--- Pixel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- only services that have a useful default
configuration are on by
default
Wrong, apcupsd, dhcpd, jabber, named, nfs, ntpd,
smb,
ypbind, and maybe mysql and ldap (can't remember)
are
on by default if
David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
maybe we could disable nfs by default, agreed.
for the others, i don't know :-/
if you are right, I do agree they should not be
running by default,
and it's a bug. And you should report to the
maintainers.
So the package decides not drakx?
--- Pixel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
maybe we could disable nfs by default, agreed.
for the others, i don't know :-/
if you are right, I do agree they should not be
running by default,
and it's a bug. And you should report to the
David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I thought that field let chkconfig know what runlevels
to enable the service for with chkconfig service on.
How does it know then?
well it's quite ugly but that's redhat you've done it so.
they have decided to put - everywhere, and they use
chkconfig
Austin Acton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I only have one request to add to v9.0 in the installer. I want an
Install All button - ala Redhat. Disks are cheap. The time required to
get the system fully operational isn't. Having an install all capability
would be a real productivity enhancer for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And I have one more suggestion. I ran into this while upgrading via CD from
9.0 B1 to B2...when doing an expert upgrade and it comes to package
selection time it gets VERY confusing. If you select all the groups of
packages you want to upgrade by ticking next to
--- Pixel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- RedHat has (very) few packages which explain why
Install All is no
such big deal for them (hell, they don't even have
rxvt anymore!)
Yeah, I noticed that. RedHat sucks! No xlockmore
either!
- only services that have a useful default
configuration
Cheers Pixel. Does this mean the screen is gone or do you simply tick
the groups of packages you want to upgrade and if they are installed it
adds up the upgrade size and compares it to the size available??
Hasta~~
Jason
Pixel wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And I have one more
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Cheers Pixel. Does this mean the screen is gone or do you simply tick the
groups of packages you want to upgrade and if they are installed it adds up
the upgrade size and compares it to the size available??
it computes the size as done in 8.2, ie it does:
On Tuesday 13 August 2002 04:04, Austin Acton wrote:
Thanks for your support.
You have good ideas, but some of them won't fly.
We NEED rpm to keep things uniform. Easy to upgrade, easy to replace,
(not-so)easy to build, and the same for every package. Seriously. If
there is ANYTHING that
Someone on the club had a cool and easy suggestion, so I just wanted to
make sure you heard it.
Austin
(quoting)
Hello!
I only have one request to add to v9.0 in the installer. I want an
Install All button - ala Redhat. Disks are cheap. The time required to
get the system fully operational
I would like to 2nd this concept.
Also I would like to add a little something for some day in the future,
maybe...
Follow the thought, it would be too hard to describe otherwise...
1. Say CD1 is a minimal installer and a file system, rudimentary, ready to
go. ( And yes, I've actually
And I have one more suggestion. I ran into this while upgrading via CD
from 9.0 B1 to B2...when doing an expert upgrade and it comes to
package selection time it gets VERY confusing. If you select all the
groups of packages you want to upgrade by ticking next to them (and turn
off individual
1. Say CD1 is a minimal installer and a file system, rudimentary, ready to
go. ( And yes, I've actually created such a thing on contract for a
company in the Northwest so I know this pretty well... )
2. You do the install and partition, and format, and BL !
Your
Thanks for your support.
You have good ideas, but some of them won't fly.
We NEED rpm to keep things uniform. Easy to upgrade, easy to replace,
(not-so)easy to build, and the same for every package. Seriously. If
there is ANYTHING that linux needs to survive it's a bit of
standardization
On Monday 12 August 2002 09:05 pm, Ryan Little wrote:
1. Say CD1 is a minimal installer and a file system, rudimentary, ready
to go. ( And yes, I've actually created such a thing on contract for a
company in the Northwest so I know this pretty well... )
2. You do the install and
On Monday 12 August 2002 09:04 pm, Austin Acton wrote:
Thanks for your support.
You have good ideas, but some of them won't fly.
We NEED rpm to keep things uniform. Easy to upgrade, easy to replace,
(not-so)easy to build, and the same for every package. Seriously. If
there is ANYTHING
On Tue, 13 Aug 2002 11:45, allen wrote:
On Monday 12 August 2002 09:05 pm, Ryan Little wrote:
1. Say CD1 is a minimal installer and a file system, rudimentary,
ready to go. ( And yes, I've actually created such a thing on contract
for a company in the Northwest so I know this pretty well...
On Monday 12 August 2002 11:15 pm, Leon Brooks wrote:
snips minimal install cd1 with base file system that has rpm database of
what is rpm -ivh'd in advance into the base file system so it is rpm
-Uvh-able...
If I did it that way (or the following way), I'd install a minimal amount
of RPM
Quick additional thought...
Maybe now IS a good time to bring this up...
DVD...
That would give enough room to have one of more base images, kernel selection,
plus everything that needs installing while you're already up and running...
Don't forget though some HDD needs available for
30 matches
Mail list logo
