: Friday, September 27, 2002 7:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Cooker] LM9.0: Setting up LVM
Well, I succeeded today setting Up LM9.0 with LVM. I believe the pbm was
that I used Linux_extended (0x85) partition type instead of plain
Extended.
I have now the following setup:
SWAP hda1 Primary
On Sat, 2002-09-28 at 18:28, Alan Hughes wrote:
The problem with having / on an LVM volume set is that LILO can't handle it.
Take this scenario as an example: mt LVM volume set spans 3 disks, that
means a root file system could potentially be on any of those disks. LILO
would have to analyse
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 8:32 PM
Subject: [Cooker] LM9.0: Setting up LVM
Hi
I have been trying to setup LM9.0 using LVM with no success so far...
The box is a vanilla Dell 4100 with a 20Gb HD, 256MB Ram P3 933MHz
The first pbm is that / cannot
afterwards, but
maybe I did'nt test it well enough.
- Original Message -
From: Frederic Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 8:32 PM
Subject: [Cooker] LM9.0: Setting up LVM
Hi
I have been trying to setup LM9.0
Hi
I have been trying to setup LM9.0 using LVM with no success so far...
The box is a vanilla Dell 4100 with a 20Gb HD, 256MB Ram P3 933MHz
The first pbm is that / cannot be part of the LVM... (had no pbm having
/ part of the LVM on RH (null) and Gentoo.
Scenario A
--
1) ran fdisk
Please remove my name from the mailing list
Frederic Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
HiI have been trying to setup LM9.0 using LVM with no success so far...The box is a vanilla Dell 4100 with a 20Gb HD, 256MB Ram P3 933MHzThe first pbm is that / cannot be part of the LVM... (had no pbm having/
