On 08/09/03 11:20:13, Buchan Milne wrote:
Forget about the performance aspects for a moment, since they are
mostly
irrelevant, but the package management aspects may be ...
There is no concrete evidence that gentoo performs faster than other
distros, exept perhaps for a handfull of multimedia
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 09 August 2003 21:00, Austin wrote:
If you forget about the optimisation arguments, and think about the
time-saving and customisation aspects, I think a tool like Portage for
rpm/urpmi would be useful. Just think, we may never see
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 09 August 2003 16:55, Leon Brooks wrote:
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 20:11, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
cooker is
usually quite up to date on most areas, and you'd rather want
something that's tested and actually works, don't you?
Sorry -
Two and a half years ago I was enchanted with Mandrake Linux. The
release cycles were much faster and more bold at using the latest
versions of the applications that people wanted at the time. She
was feature rich and still leads the pack in the installation
many categories. I'm always
On 08/09/03 16:36:58, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
I cannot see how this would solve the problem with packages unable to build
on
older releases, you still have to satisfy those new dependencies, maybe you
could try to cut stuff down a little, and only compile in features you want
yourself, not
On Sun, 10 Aug 2003, andre wrote:
On Saturday 09 August 2003 17:20, Buchan Milne wrote:
I wanted to reply to this one earlier, but gave up after mozilla crashed
on the half-finished mail ..
You got mozilla working. That is more than most
It's been working fine since I started running
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 08 August 2003 13:44, Joe Baker wrote:
Two and a half years ago I was enchanted with Mandrake Linux. The
release cycles were much faster and more bold at using the latest
versions of the applications that people wanted at the time. She
On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 07:11, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 08 August 2003 13:44, Joe Baker wrote:
Two and a half years ago I was enchanted with Mandrake Linux. The
release cycles were much faster and more bold at using the latest
On Saturday 09 August 2003 17:20, Buchan Milne wrote:
I wanted to reply to this one earlier, but gave up after mozilla crashed
on the half-finished mail ..
You got mozilla working. That is more than most
On 08/09/03 17:36:36, Buchan Milne wrote:
Time to get to know perl::URPM I fear ...
I shudder to think of it.
Austin
--
Austin Acton Hon.B.Sc.
Synthetic Organic Chemist, Teaching Assistant
Department of Chemistry, York University, Toronto
On Sat, 9 Aug 2003, Per [iso-8859-1] Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 09 August 2003 21:00, Austin wrote:
It would be an amazing feature. The only two tricky parts would be:
1. making it 'intelligent' enough to only upgrade the necessary
I wanted to reply to this one earlier, but gave up after mozilla crashed
on the half-finished mail ..
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, Per [iso-8859-1] Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 08 August 2003 13:44, Joe Baker wrote:
Two and a half years ago I was
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 20:11, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
cooker is
usually quite up to date on most areas, and you'd rather want
something that's tested and actually works, don't you?
Sorry - tested and actually works isn't fitting very well inside my
head with cooker. (-:
Cheers; Leon
13 matches
Mail list logo
