Vadim Plessky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday 19 February 2002 22:22, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> | Geoffrey Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | > IIRC, It is non-free, unfortunately.
> |
> | Yes. Even unrar was removed from contrib because of the licensing
> | issue.
>
> Is t
»Vadim Plessky« sagte am 2002-02-20 um 11:24:20 + :
> any plans to add ARJ to Cooker? :-)
As far as I know, there isn't an ARJ version for linux, is there? Not
that it matters much, because RAR is better...
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.t
On Tuesday 19 February 2002 22:22, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
| Geoffrey Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > IIRC, It is non-free, unfortunately.
|
| Yes. Even unrar was removed from contrib because of the licensing
| issue.
Is there someone on Cooker list who is located in California, p
»Guillaume Cottenceau« sagte am 2002-02-19 um 23:22:49 +0100 :
> position is very slow, and if there is corruption at a place of
> the stream, the whole rest of data is lost.
However, that's not true with RAR. RAR (and also the even better
compressing ACE archiver) support so called "recovery da
Geoffrey Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> IIRC, It is non-free, unfortunately.
Yes. Even unrar was removed from contrib because of the licensing
issue.
> We all know that RAR is good but because of licensing issues we cannot do
> that.
Well RAR is nice, but as ARJ or even bzip2, the compress
On Fri Feb 15, 2002 at 12:20:30PM +1100, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
> > > Vadim Plessky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > >> Reason why you may want to use rar, instead of zip: zip can't cut
> > >> archive into multiple pcs, say, of 1.5MB
> >
> > > tar -M
> >
> > ...with the added advantage of working on
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 07:27:34AM +0800, Leon Brooks wrote:
> On Friday 15 February 2002 00:34, Han wrote:
> > Vadim Plessky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >> Reason why you may want to use rar, instead of zip: zip can't cut
> >> archive into multiple pcs, say, of 1.5MB
>
> > tar -M
>
> ...with t
On Thursday 14 February 2002 22:18, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
> Anyway, there are other ways to split files up -- but it does result in a
> bit of inconvenience if you don't know how to join them back up with a bit
> of shell scripting.
Instructions are your friend. Presuming the attachments arrived in
On Friday 15 February 2002 00:34, Han wrote:
> Vadim Plessky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> Reason why you may want to use rar, instead of zip: zip can't cut
>> archive into multiple pcs, say, of 1.5MB
> tar -M
...with the added advantage of working on practically anything Unixish, and
Windows (
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 01:51:33AM +1100, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
> yes, I am sure that many are aware here that in the windows world (in the
> power users category) people are aware that RAR is a very good
> compression algorithm. We also know that in windows people distribute stuff
> using RAR, pr0n
Ainsi parlait Geoffrey Lee :
[..]
> > BTW: does it mean that PLD Linux is not so distinctive with licensing
> > issues?
>
> PLD is not any different -- a license is a license. Unless they have
> special permission, in which case probably a new license would be in force,
> under some special provis
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 08:17:45PM +, Vadim Plessky wrote:
> | > absolutely necessary to have!
> |
> | IIRC, It is non-free, unfortunately.
> |
> | We all know that RAR is good but because of licensing issues we cannot do
> | that.
> |
>
> ahh, I forgot to take a look at its license..
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 06:48:15PM +0100, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> Ainsi parlait Geoffrey Lee :
> [..]
> > > BTW: does it mean that PLD Linux is not so distinctive with licensing
> > > issues?
> >
> > PLD is not any different -- a license is a license. Unless they have
> > special permission, in
>
>
>IIRC, It is non-free, unfortunately.
>
>We all know that RAR is good but because of licensing issues we cannot do
>that.
>
>Anyway, there are other ways to split files up -- but it does result in a
>bit of inconvenience if you don't know how to join them back up with a bit
>of shell scriptin
> and rebuild it without any problem (except rpm wanted , for some reason, to
> be built as root)
>
> resulting binary (i586) rar works fine.
>
> Reason why you may want to use rar, instead of zip:
> zip can't cut archive into multiple pcs, say, of 1.5MB
> You may need to send files as an atta
On Thursday 14 February 2002 16:34, Han wrote:
| Vadim Plessky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
| > Reason why you may want to use rar, instead of zip: zip can't cut
| > archive into multiple pcs, say, of 1.5MB
| >
| > You may need to send files as an attachment by mail, and as many mail
| >
On Thursday 14 February 2002 14:18, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
| >
| > Reason why you may want to use rar, instead of zip:
| > zip can't cut archive into multiple pcs, say, of 1.5MB
| > You may need to send files as an attachment by mail, and as many mail
| > servers reject all mails with attac
Ainsi parlait Vadim Plessky :
> Can someone from MDK add rar archiver to Cooker/LM 8.2, please?
>
> It's available for several Linux distros, and I am wondering why MDK
> doesn't have it.
License problems. Check list archive for details.
If you find a rar archiver with a clear free/os license, yo
>
>
>>Reason why you may want to use rar, instead of zip: zip can't cut
>>archive into multiple pcs, say, of 1.5MB
>>
>>You may need to send files as an attachment by mail, and as many mail
>>servers reject all mails with attachements >2MB, tool like rar is
>>absolutely necessary to have!
>>
>
>ta
Vadim Plessky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Reason why you may want to use rar, instead of zip: zip can't cut
> archive into multiple pcs, say, of 1.5MB
>
> You may need to send files as an attachment by mail, and as many mail
> servers reject all mails with attachements >2MB, tool like rar is
Can someone from MDK add rar archiver to Cooker/LM 8.2, please?
It's available for several Linux distros, and I am wondering why MDK doesn't
have it. Check
http://rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/search.php?query=rar&submit=Search+...
I have taken this source
ftp://rpmfind.net/linux/PLD/current/dist
21 matches
Mail list logo
