> "danny" == <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
danny> On 4 Dec 2002, Juan Quintela wrote:
scott> Does this include the preemption patch or low latency patch?
scott> Just wondering.
scott> Scott
>>
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> No preemption.
>> lowlatency is there since at least 8.2 beta.
danny> That is not
On 4 Dec 2002, Juan Quintela wrote:
> scott> Does this include the preemption patch or low latency patch?
> scott> Just wondering.
> scott> Scott
>
>
> Hi
>
> No preemption.
> lowlatency is there since at least 8.2 beta.
That is not completely true me thinks. It is a mini-lowlatency patch. For
> "owen" == Owen Savill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Does this include the preemption patch or low latency patch?
owen> Or indeed the NGPT (Posix Threads) changes ?
Still deciding with mandrake glibc maintainer (aka gb) if we are going
to use NGPT or NTPL?
Don't you like acronims?
Later
> "scott" == scott chevalley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
scott> Does this include the preemption patch or low latency patch?
scott> Just wondering.
scott> Scott
Hi
No preemption.
lowlatency is there since at least 8.2 beta.
Later, Juan.
scott> Juan Quintela wrote:
>> --=-=-=
>> Name
Disabled ACPI for the 2.4.20 kernel in lilo, and all is well again.
Thanks guys.
On 2002.11.21 John Allen wrote:
> On Thursday 21 November 2002 10:00, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
> > On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Owen Savill wrote:
> > > >>> Does this include the preemption patch or low latency patch?
> > >
>
> The NVIDIA accelerated drivers don't appear to work with the 2.4.20 kernel.
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002 14:13:00 +
John Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 21 November 2002 13:38, Simon Ree wrote:
> > On 21 Nov 2002 11:01:39 +
> >
> > Adam Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 10:04, John Allen wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 21 November
On Thursday 21 November 2002 13:38, Simon Ree wrote:
> On 21 Nov 2002 11:01:39 +
>
> Adam Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 10:04, John Allen wrote:
> > > On Thursday 21 November 2002 10:00, Gwenole Beauchesne
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Owen Sa
On 21 Nov 2002 11:01:39 +
Adam Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 10:04, John Allen wrote:
> > On Thursday 21 November 2002 10:00, Gwenole Beauchesne
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Owen Savill wrote:
> > > > >>> Does this include the preemption patch or low
>
On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 10:04, John Allen wrote:
> On Thursday 21 November 2002 10:00, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
> > On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Owen Savill wrote:
> > > >>> Does this include the preemption patch or low latency patch?
> > >
>
> The NVIDIA accelerated drivers don't appear to work with the
On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 11:45, Pierrot Rey wrote:
> Le Jeudi, 21 Novembre 2002 11.04, John Allen a écrit :
> > On Thursday 21 November 2002 10:00, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
> > > On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Owen Savill wrote:
> > > > >>> Does this include the preemption patch or low latency patch?
> >
> >
Le Jeudi, 21 Novembre 2002 11.04, John Allen a écrit :
> On Thursday 21 November 2002 10:00, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
> > On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Owen Savill wrote:
> > > >>> Does this include the preemption patch or low latency patch?
>
> The NVIDIA accelerated drivers don't appear to work with the
Am Donnerstag, 21. November 2002, 10:04:09 Uhr MET, schrieb John Allen:
> The NVIDIA accelerated drivers don't appear to work with the 2.4.20 kernel.
> Driver just hangs.
> Anybody outh there got them working?
Yes. But I had to disable ACPI.
--
Götz Waschk <> master of computer science <>
On Thursday 21 November 2002 10:00, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Owen Savill wrote:
> > >>> Does this include the preemption patch or low latency patch?
> >
The NVIDIA accelerated drivers don't appear to work with the 2.4.20 kernel.
Driver just hangs.
Anybody outh there got t
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Owen Savill wrote:
> >>> Does this include the preemption patch or low latency patch?
> Or indeed the NGPT (Posix Threads) changes ?
Most of NGPT changes should be there. However that's not the goal for ia32
branch. Probably post 9.1, we'll use NPTL instead and a backport of
>>> Does this include the preemption patch or low latency patch?
Or indeed the NGPT (Posix Threads) changes ?
Owen
scott chevalley wrote:
I saw the 2.4.19 on mdk club but I need XFS support so instead I've been
using a 2.5.46 kernel, which is working just fine so far. I need to
get 2.5.48 a
I saw the 2.4.19 on mdk club but I need XFS support so instead I've been
using a 2.5.46 kernel, which is working just fine so far. I need to
get 2.5.48 and compile that up to see what's new.
If you get a chance and make a 2.4.20 with pre-empt and XFS, then I may
use that as a fallback :).
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, scott chevalley wrote:
> Does this include the preemption patch or low latency patch?
Although I haven't looked yet: I do not think so.
I provide a 2.4.19 preempt kernel on mdk club. And plan to soon include
lock-breaking (already compiled and tested). The default mdk kernel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Es Dimecres 20 Novembre 2002 14:27, en scott chevalley va escriure:
> Does this include the preemption patch or low latency patch?
Where can I find that one? Last I've seen at cooker is 2.4.19-19mdk 8-?
TIA
- --
Joan Tur. Eivissa-Spain
AOL quini
Does this include the preemption patch or low latency patch?
Just wondering.
Scott
Juan Quintela wrote:
--=-=-=
Name: kernel-2.4.20.0.1mdk Relocations: (not relocateable)
Version : 1 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
Release : 1mdk
20 matches
Mail list logo
