On Tue, 2002-02-19 at 05:43, Bill Greenwood wrote:
>
> transfugdrake would be: mdktransfuge
> drakconf would be: mdkconf, or maybe: mdkctrlcntr
> drakfirsttime would be: mdkfirsttime
> We already have: mdkonline
Alternatively, prefixing all of them with drak would work and require
less work. The
Fantastic idea. I always wondered why there were naming discrepancies
with the mdk configuration tools. And I also agree that ALL mandrake
configuration tools should be in MCC. It would make it so much easier,
especially since some tools are redundant within the KDE/Gnome setup
tools. One
Alexander Skwar wrote:
>»Bill Greenwood« sagte am 2002-02-20 um 00:43:11 +1300 :
>
>>Any other thoughts on this?
>>
>
>Good idea! This would allow users to type mdk to see what
>Mandrake tools are available.
>
Yes, I have problems finding Mandrake config tools myself. It would be
great if they
»Bill Greenwood« sagte am 2002-02-20 um 00:43:11 +1300 :
> Any other thoughts on this?
Good idea! This would allow users to type mdk to see what
Mandrake tools are available.
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english)
Homepage: http://w
I suggest that each of the Mandrake tools have a small change in their
naming layout for the directory listing, and for other reasons.
The way it is right now, each of the tools are laid out in their name
just a little different, which makes it hard to easily spot a Mandrake
Tool. And sometim
