Hamster is a fabulous bot, it find rpm on my mirror.
So, where is glibc-utils -5mdk:
main cooker i586: glibc-2.3.2-5mdk.i586.rpm
main cooker i586: glibc-utils-2.3.2-4mdk.i586.rpm
(Urpmi said same things)
Thanks hamster.
BTW: I got a failed about memusage on ppc, I am investigate because I don't
Bernd Niederberger wrote:
Hi everybody,
I 've installed Mandrake 9.1-rc3 and I am missing xev.
Has anybody an idea where it is?
Looks like X11R6-contrib is not on CDs. You can get it from a cooker mirror.
Hi everybody,
I 've installed Mandrake 9.1-rc3 and I am missing xev.
Has anybody an idea where it is?
Regards
Bernd
On Sun, 2003-03-23 at 01:31, Gary Greene wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sunday 23 March 2003 2:24 am, Quel Qun wrote:
> > On Sat, 2003-03-22 at 23:12, Gary Greene wrote:
> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > >
> > > subject asks it all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 23 March 2003 2:24 am, Quel Qun wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-03-22 at 23:12, Gary Greene wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> >
> > subject asks it all...
>
> I don't think it's anywhere, there's a defect entered about
On Sat, 2003-03-22 at 23:12, Gary Greene wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> subject asks it all...
>
I don't think it's anywhere, there's a defect entered about that.
You need to regenerate them from the kdelibs sources.
And don't forget to complain loudly.
--
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 23 March 2003 08:12, Gary Greene wrote:
> subject asks it all...
rpm -ql kdelibs?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] hawkeye]$ rpm -ql kdelibs|grep doc
/usr/share/doc/HTML
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common/1.p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
subject asks it all...
- --
Gary L. Greene, Jr.
Sent from uriel.gvsu.edu
02:11:33 up 23:39, 5 users, load average: 0.10, 0.10, 0.11
Founder and president of the Grand Valley Linux Users
I remeber some times ago (maybe one year back) someone from this list proposed
some kind of howto about reporting bugs properly (using strace, reporting
stderr output, etc...). I can't find it anywhere in cooker archive
unfortunatly :-(
Could the author please remind us of where it was ?
--
All
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bj?rn wrote on Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 12:24:45AM + :
> Is this OK? (Y/n)
>
> ftp.uninett.no::Mandrake/Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/aspell-no-0.50.2-3mdk.i586.rpm
> link_stat
> /Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/aspell-no-0.50
Is this OK? (Y/n)
ftp.uninett.no::Mandrake/Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/aspell-no-0.50.2-3mdk.i586.rpm
link_stat
/Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/aspell-no-0.50.2-3mdk.i586.rpm : No
such file or directory
rsync error: some files could not be transferred (code 23) at main
On Saturday 01 March 2003 07:41 am, Greg Meyer wrote:
> I don't think I ever have not gotten a message in a 8 hour time span
> before.
the gates are open now
jim tarvid
I don't think I ever have not gotten a message in a 8 hour time span before.
--
Greg
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 12:53, Lonnie Borntreger wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 14:47, Chuck Shirley wrote:
> > On Wednesday 12 February 2003 07:21, Combelles, Christophe (MED, ALTEN) wrote:
> > >Is it wanted ? kcontrol does not appear in the menu. You only have
> > >access to each kcontrol part sep
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 14:47, Chuck Shirley wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 February 2003 07:21, Combelles, Christophe (MED, ALTEN) wrote:
> >Is it wanted ? kcontrol does not appear in the menu. You only have
> >access to each kcontrol part separately, but not as a single application.
> >This would be nic
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 07:21, Combelles, Christophe (MED, ALTEN) wrote:
>Is it wanted ? kcontrol does not appear in the menu. You only have
>access to each kcontrol part separately, but not as a single application.
>This would be nice to have it in the KDE config submenu.
Yes! I have been
Is it wanted ? kcontrol does not appear in the menu. You only have
access to each kcontrol part separately, but not as a single application.
This would be nice to have it in the KDE config submenu.
Where is prelink? Is it contained within another package?
On Sat, 2003-02-01 at 23:55, Antony Suter wrote:
> To compile the current glibc in cooker requires prelink, but prelink is
> not in cooker...
>
> --
> Name: glibcRelocations: (not
> relocateable)
> Version
To compile the current glibc in cooker requires prelink, but prelink is
not in cooker...
--
Name: glibcRelocations: (not
relocateable)
Version : 2.3.1 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
Release : 7mdk Build Date: Wed J
J.A. Magallon wrote:
PHP modules update require it, and it does not appear in mirrors...
Install the php-cli-4.3.0-1mdk or php-cgi-4.3.0-1mdk package. They
provide php430.
--
Mark Scott
PHP modules update require it, and it does not appear in mirrors...
--
J.A. Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> \ Software is like sex:
werewolf.able.es \ It's better when it's free
Mandrake Linux release 9.1 (Cooker) for i586
Linux 2.4.21-pre3-jam1
I see, thanks for that!!
Regards,
Jason
Charles A Edwards wrote:
On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 10:36:23 +1300
Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It doesn't appear to be on the cooker mirrors??
Is it not necessary anymore? ;)
There is only makedev now.
It provides /dev
Charles
--
On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 10:36:23 +1300
Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It doesn't appear to be on the cooker mirrors??
>
> Is it not necessary anymore? ;)
There is only makedev now.
It provides /dev
Charles
Ignorance is bliss.
-- Thomas Gray
Fortune u
It doesn't appear to be on the cooker mirrors??
Is it not necessary anymore? ;)
> W. Kasberg wrote:
> > On Monday 07 October 2002 09:19, Robert C. Dowdy wrote:
> >
>
> >>Actually, I believe this *is* a bug. I've installed 9.0 final three times
> >>and each time spell checking in OpenOffice.org was broken until I manually
> >>installed a US English myspell (which newbies c
W. Kasberg wrote:
> On Monday 07 October 2002 09:19, Robert C. Dowdy wrote:
>
>>Actually, I believe this *is* a bug. I've installed 9.0 final three times
>>and each time spell checking in OpenOffice.org was broken until I manually
>>installed a US English myspell (which newbies certainly wouldn
On Monday 07 October 2002 09:19, Robert C. Dowdy wrote:
> On Saturday 05 October 2002 5:55 am, Buchan Milne wrote:
> > On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Vox wrote:
> > > Carfield Yim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > Hi all, I have installed the mandrake version rpm package of
> > > > OpenOffice. However, the
On Saturday 05 October 2002 5:55 am, Buchan Milne wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Vox wrote:
> > Carfield Yim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Hi all, I have installed the mandrake version rpm package of
> > > OpenOffice. However, the package don't contain any dictionary files.
> > > Where can I fin
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Vox wrote:
> Carfield Yim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi all, I have installed the mandrake version rpm package of OpenOffice.
> > However, the package don't contain any dictionary files. Where can I
> > find the dictionary file and install?
>
> urpmi OpenOffice.org-l1
Carfield Yim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all, I have installed the mandrake version rpm package of OpenOffice.
> However, the package don't contain any dictionary files. Where can I
> find the dictionary file and install?
urpmi OpenOffice.org-l10n-
Vox
--
Pain is the gift of the god
Hi all, I have installed the mandrake version rpm package of OpenOffice.
However, the package don't contain any dictionary files. Where can I
find the dictionary file and install?
I remember that when I install the binary version of OpenOffice, it come
with the US English version of dictionary,
On Wednesday 02 October 2002 01:00 am, Palmer, Hilary wrote:
> C-Kermit was in 8.2. Used it almost every day.
Pull the 8.2 SRPM then, and rebuild it. Maybe PLF or Texstar have it.
Cheers; Leon
: [Cooker] Where is kermit?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I like the vague one line message with the 10+ line confidentiality
notice. I'm not a lawyer, but I think that whatever is the law applies,
regardless of whether you put a notice like that or not... it really
seems like a
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 05:13:32PM +0100, Alastair Scott wrote:
: On Tue, 1 Oct 2002 10:55:21 -0500 "Palmer, Hilary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:
: > Where did kermit go?? :-(
:
: Probably removed because the licence
:
: ftp://kermit.columbia.edu/kermit/f/COPYING.TXT
:
: was considered
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I like the vague one line message with the 10+ line confidentiality
notice. I'm not a lawyer, but I think that whatever is the law applies,
regardless of whether you put a notice like that or not... it really
seems like a waste of bandwidth. Besides,
Palmer, Hilary wrote:
>Where did kermit go?? :-(
>
he was here a few weeks ago visiting miss piggy for new muppet christmas
movie.
( filmed in my area ) ~wink~
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002 10:55:21 -0500 "Palmer, Hilary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where did kermit go?? :-(
Probably removed because the licence
ftp://kermit.columbia.edu/kermit/f/COPYING.TXT
was considered too one-sided. This discussion is most revealing:
http://www.columbia.edu/kermit/
Where did kermit go?? :-(
Confidentiality Notice
This message is intended for the sole use of the individual and entity to
whom it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under a
That's indeed what I'm doing. And I'm glad to (finally) be able to synch
to my USB visor!
Rich
On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 10:18, Frederic Crozat wrote:
But you can still synchronize your palm with gnome-pilot : just add
gpilotd to your current session and check gpilotd output from
~/.xse
Le Tue, 13 Aug 2002 08:13:44 +, Richard Tango-Lowy a écrit :
> --=-2RcLZxqwM4+gwJt7YKqN
> Content-Type: text/plain
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> I can't seem to find the gnome pilot applet in 9.0. Is it gone?
Indeed.. Gnome-pilot has not been ported to GNOME 2 yet..
But
Am Dienstag, 13. August 2002, 08:13:44 Uhr MET, schrieb Richard Tango-Lowy:
> I can't seem to find the gnome pilot applet in 9.0. Is it gone?
If it's gnome1 stuff, then yes. The new gnome2 panel isn't compatible
with old applets :-(
--
Götz Waschk <> master of computer science <> University
I can't seem to find the gnome pilot applet in 9.0. Is it gone?
Rich
--
ars Cognita Richard Tango-Lowy
-
President
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
603 424-0713
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sat, 2002-08-03 at 21:47, Antony Suter wrote:
>
> I'm trying to upgrade my perl to current cooker. I dont want to download
> unnecessary rpms. Please tell me where to find libg2c.so.0 ? Thanks.
>
> error: failed dependencies:
> libg2c.so.0 is needed by perl-PDL-2.3.3-3mdk
libf2c0
--
I'm trying to upgrade my perl to current cooker. I dont want to download
unnecessary rpms. Please tell me where to find libg2c.so.0 ? Thanks.
error: failed dependencies:
libg2c.so.0 is needed by perl-PDL-2.3.3-3mdk
--
- Antony Suter (sutera internode on net) "Exner"
- "Tools to mak
thx thats work :)
i have miss to try with locate :(
+
Le jeu 01/08/2002 à 08:08, David Walser a écrit :
> If your package is installed correctly, you have it.
>
> [walser@mario walser]$ rpm -qlp
> /mnt/disk/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/kdebase-3.0.2-28mdk.i586.rpm
> | grep sysguard
> /etc/ksysgua
Le Thursday 01 August 2002 08:08, networker a écrit :
> but im using kde i have kdebase !
>
> but not ksysguard !
>
> what can i do to find it !!! and use it ?
Ksysguard is in kdebase.
Regards.
>
> my kdebase version is 3.0.2-23
>
> thx 4 help
If your package is installed correctly, you have it.
[walser@mario walser]$ rpm -qlp
/mnt/disk/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/kdebase-3.0.2-28mdk.i586.rpm
| grep sysguard
/etc/ksysguarddrc
/usr/bin/ksysguard
/usr/bin/ksysguardd
...
--- networker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> but im using kde i have kd
but im using kde i have kdebase !
but not ksysguard !
what can i do to find it !!! and use it ?
my kdebase version is 3.0.2-23
thx 4 help
Le jeu 01/08/2002 à 06:46, David Walser a écrit :
> It's in the kdebase package. It has not to my
> knowledge ever been a seperate package.
>
> --- netw
It's in the kdebase package. It has not to my
knowledge ever been a seperate package.
--- networker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> when i use urpm to find i find nothing :(
>
> when i use rpmdrake it bug
>
> where to find this useful pakage ?!
>
>
__
when i use urpm to find i find nothing :(
when i use rpmdrake it bug
where to find this useful pakage ?!
Le Mardi 9 Avril 2002 06:03, Sean Dague a écrit :
[..]
> > You can find it on the mirrors at mandrake/8.2/contrib/i586.
>
> What is the mechanism for adding contrib directories to rpmdrake? I can't
> figure out where the hdlist is (thought I might just be missing it at this
> point).
The hdlist i
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 04:52:19PM +0100, Peter Ruskin wrote:
> On Saturday 06 Apr 2002 16:26, Sean Dague wrote:
> > I'm looking through the 8.2 RPM lists getting ready to upgrade my 4
> > Linux Mandrake 8.1 boxes, and can't for the life of me find AfterStep
> > in there anywhere. Did it get yoin
On Saturday 06 Apr 2002 16:26, Sean Dague wrote:
> I'm looking through the 8.2 RPM lists getting ready to upgrade my 4
> Linux Mandrake 8.1 boxes, and can't for the life of me find AfterStep
> in there anywhere. Did it get yoinked again!?!
>
> I have been a loyal fan of Linux Mandrake for many ye
I'm looking through the 8.2 RPM lists getting ready to upgrade my 4 Linux
Mandrake 8.1 boxes, and can't for the life of me find AfterStep in there
anywhere. Did it get yoinked again!?!
I have been a loyal fan of Linux Mandrake for many years, and am a member of
the Mandrake Club, mostly because
Op do 28-02-2002, om 18:03 schreef Borsenkow Andrej:
> People write about? I do not see it after updating kernel several times
> :(
>
> -andrej
me too.
I want to see it. And think rute thinks about it just like with Aurora
Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> People write about? I do not see it after updating kernel several times
> :(
check the latest initscripts + bootsplash package.
--
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://www.frozen-bubble.org/
Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> People write about? I do not see it after updating kernel several times
> :(
It appears with splash screen.
A bit less buggy in initscripts 31mdk
--
Warly
Baal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I see enlightenment-conf is not on the CDs... Was it forgotten or do you
> plan not to put it in the distro? This tool is very useful to configure
> E and I hope it will be available...
According to rpmmon, it's currently rejected, true. It can be for
Hi,
I see enlightenment-conf is not on the CDs... Was it forgotten or do you
plan not to put it in the distro? This tool is very useful to configure
E and I hope it will be available...
Regards,
Baal
Christian Bricart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 06:08:23PM +0100, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
>> mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> [..]
>> > and which version(s) does it work with?
>>
>> Latest kernel latest mkinitrd.
>
> Should mkinitrd not get a dependancy to bootsplash
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 06:08:23PM +0100, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
> mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [..]
> > and which version(s) does it work with?
>
> Latest kernel latest mkinitrd.
Should mkinitrd not get a dependancy to bootsplash ?
Christian
--
"Backups are for wimps. Real men upload
mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Where do you find "bootsplash rpm" ??
On the mirrors.
> and which version(s) does it work with?
Latest kernel latest mkinitrd.
--
http://www.chmouel.org/
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
>
> Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > It has been replaced by small albeit cute penguin. What gives?
>
> Install bootsplash rpm and regenerate an initrd.
>
> --
> http://www.chmouel.org/
Where do you find "bootsplash rpm" ??
and which version(s) doe
Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It has been replaced by small albeit cute penguin. What gives?
Install bootsplash rpm and regenerate an initrd.
--
http://www.chmouel.org/
It has been replaced by small albeit cute penguin. What gives?
-andrej
No problem, it works and i can live without it ;)
Pascal
Le Tuesday 05 February 2002 16:08, Laurent Montel a écrit :
> Le Tuesday 05 February 2002 15:00, pascal a écrit :
> > Missing rpm in contrib ?
> > no package seems to provide libfreetype.so.7
> >
> > # urpmi kdetoys3
> > error: failed dep
Le Tuesday 05 February 2002 15:00, pascal a écrit :
> Missing rpm in contrib ?
> no package seems to provide libfreetype.so.7
>
> # urpmi kdetoys3
> error: failed dependencies:
> libfreetype.so.7 is needed by kdetoys3-3.0-0.beta1.5mdk
I don't have time to fix it.
Wait please.
Regards
Missing rpm in contrib ?
no package seems to provide libfreetype.so.7
# urpmi kdetoys3
error: failed dependencies:
libfreetype.so.7 is needed by kdetoys3-3.0-0.beta1.5mdk
... I forgot the Kernel modules ...
LIRC builds modules for the running Kernel, I see my 'unsupported'
Plustek parport scanner also needs misc modules.
I build the modules after every kernel update. How about an
kernel-modules-misc package with some additional modules? (to make me
happy ;-)
Stef
Hi cookers,
I like to use my Hauppauge remote control to remote control my system
(xawtv, radio, irmp3/cd, some [X]system cmds).
It's not a great thing to get the package working.But using it is great!
Are there any problems with http://www.lirc.org/ (I missed a mdk link) -
or is this package si
On Wed, 2002-01-16 at 19:50, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 10:15:12PM -0800, Quel Qun wrote:
> > Isn't this header missing? It does not seem to be in libxpm4-devel
> >
> > I cannot find it anywhere in fact.
> >
>
> I believe both maintainers (david and fredl) were trying to corr
>
>
>Isn't this header missing? It does not seem to be in libxpm4-devel
>
It used to be in libxpm4-devel, then XFree86-*-4.1.99.6-1mdk came out
which had xpm.h in the devel package (= conflict), then xpm.h was
removed from libxpm4-devel (in libxpm4-*-3.4k-18mdk), and now it's also
not in XFree8
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 10:15:12PM -0800, Quel Qun wrote:
> Isn't this header missing? It does not seem to be in libxpm4-devel
>
> I cannot find it anywhere in fact.
>
I believe both maintainers (david and fredl) were trying to correct the
same problem by removing xpm.h from _both_ libxpm4-deve
Isn't this header missing? It does not seem to be in libxpm4-devel
I cannot find it anywhere in fact.
=-=
kk1
"R.I.P. Deaddog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I made: automake-1.5-1mdk.src.rpm, bash-2.05a-2mdk.src.rpm,
> > fileutils-4.1-6mdk.src.rpm.
> >
> > And none of these packages made it into cooker/contrib
>
> For bash and fileutils, I'm not sure, but I think automake has been
> discussed in cooke
Frederic Lepied ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Ainsi parlait Han :
> > >
> > > > I am making a new rpm and I get this error message from
> > > > rpmlint.
> > > >
> > > > E: libuds1-devel non-versioned-file-in-library-package
> > > > /usr/includ
Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Ainsi parlait Han :
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am making a new rpm and I get this error message from rpmlint.
> > >
> > > E: libuds1-devel non-versioned-file-in-library-package
> > > /usr/include/uds/flex_func.hh
> > >
> > > What should I do about i
Guillaume Rousse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Ainsi parlait Han :
>
> > E: libuds1-devel non-versioned-file-in-library-package
> >/usr/include/uds/flex_func.hh
>
> You can try -info flag if you want more explanations about rpmlint
> recriminations.
Thanks, I looked everywhere for this info
> Ainsi parlait Han :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am making a new rpm and I get this error message from rpmlint.
> >
> > E: libuds1-devel non-versioned-file-in-library-package
> > /usr/include/uds/flex_func.hh
> >
> > What should I do about it? And does anybody have a full list with
> > explanations from
Ainsi parlait Han :
> Hi,
>
> I am making a new rpm and I get this error message from rpmlint.
>
> E: libuds1-devel non-versioned-file-in-library-package
> /usr/include/uds/flex_func.hh
>
> What should I do about it? And does anybody have a full list with
> explanations from rpmlint?
You can try
Hi,
I am making a new rpm and I get this error message from rpmlint.
E: libuds1-devel non-versioned-file-in-library-package /usr/include/uds/flex_func.hh
What should I do about it? And does anybody have a full list with
explanations from rpmlint?
Groetjes, Han.
--
http://www.xs4all.nl/~ha
Hi Warly,
mkcd-2.6.1-1mdk is missing "Mkcd/Package.pm".
rpm -Uvh perl-RPM-0.32-4mdk.i586.rpm
Preparing...### [100%]
1:perl-RPM ### [100%]
rpm -Uvh perl-TimeDate-1.10-4mdk.noarch.rpm
They are not in SPECS they are not in contrib-SPECS. Where are they?
-andrej
On Thu, 25 Oct 2001 15:17:12 -0500
Paul Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday, Oct 25, 2001, Charles A Edwards wrote:
>
> > > > So where is python-devel-2.1.1-5 to solve this?
> > >
> > > libpython2.1-devel-*
> > >
> >
> > But if python-devel is installed why does libpython-devel not s
On Thursday, Oct 25, 2001, Charles A Edwards wrote:
> > > So where is python-devel-2.1.1-5 to solve this?
> >
> > libpython2.1-devel-*
> >
>
> But if python-devel is installed why does libpython-devel not show as an update
> or at least a required depend?
Probably because it's a different nam
On Thu, 25 Oct 2001 09:32:50 +0200 (CEST)
Gwenole Beauchesne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Charles A Edwards wrote:
>
> > So where is python-devel-2.1.1-5 to solve this?
>
> libpython2.1-devel-*
>
>
Thanks.
But if python-devel is installed why does libpython-devel not s
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001 18:50:46 -0400
Charles A Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The following can not be installed from todays cooker
>
> tkinter-2.1.1-5mdk.i586
> libpython2.1-2.1.1-5mdk.i586
> python-docs-2.1.1-5mdk.i586
> python-2.1.1-5mdk.i586
>
> The reason being that python-2.1.
The following can not be installed from todays cooker
tkinter-2.1.1-5mdk.i586
libpython2.1-2.1.1-5mdk.i586
python-docs-2.1.1-5mdk.i586
python-2.1.1-5mdk.i586
The reason being that python-2.1.1-4 is required by python-devel-2.1.1-4
So where is python-devel-2.1.1-5 to solve this?
Ch
On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Pixel wrote:
> > > Thanks a lot. I have reported problem about building glibc or
> > > links with gawk 3.1.0 (infinitely large files are generated during
> > > building process),
>
> i've just tested, and had no pb
Thanks, it's personal problem. My environment seems to be ser
Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "R.I.P. Deaddog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On 31 Aug 2001, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> >
> > > > Where can I get older gawk SRPMs(e.g. 3.0.6)? There are
> > > > a lot of nuisance with gawk 3.1.0 . TIA!
> > >
> > > In 8.0 f
On 1 Sep 2001, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
> > Thanks a lot. I have reported problem about building glibc or
> > links with gawk 3.1.0 (infinitely large files are generated during
> > building process), but seems to be ignored. Should I report
> > it in bugzilla instead to get more attention?
>
> you
"R.I.P. Deaddog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks a lot. I have reported problem about building glibc or
> links with gawk 3.1.0 (infinitely large files are generated during
> building process), but seems to be ignored. Should I report
> it in bugzilla instead to get more attention?
you get
"R.I.P. Deaddog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 31 Aug 2001, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
>
> > > Where can I get older gawk SRPMs(e.g. 3.0.6)? There are
> > > a lot of nuisance with gawk 3.1.0 . TIA!
> >
> > In 8.0 for example.
> >
> > /stable/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/gawk-3.0.6-2mdk.i586.rpm
On 31 Aug 2001, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> > Where can I get older gawk SRPMs(e.g. 3.0.6)? There are
> > a lot of nuisance with gawk 3.1.0 . TIA!
>
> In 8.0 for example.
>
> /stable/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/gawk-3.0.6-2mdk.i586.rpm
Thanks a lot. I have reported problem about building glibc
"R.I.P. Deaddog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> Where can I get older gawk SRPMs(e.g. 3.0.6)? There are
> a lot of nuisance with gawk 3.1.0 . TIA!
In 8.0 for example.
/stable/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/gawk-3.0.6-2mdk.i586.rpm
--
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakeso
Hi all,
Where can I get older gawk SRPMs(e.g. 3.0.6)? There are
a lot of nuisance with gawk 3.1.0 . TIA!
Abel
When some package provides different language resources (man pages,
message catalogs, etc) RPM installs only some of them. Where (file?
Variable?) is the list of languages defined?
-andrej
DUCLOS Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why kde1-compat-1.1.2-8mdk.i586.rpm & qt-1.44-30mdk.i586.rpm & (... ?) in
> mandrake/8.0/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/ (mirror server) but not in my cd
>
> ]$ ll /mnt/cdrom/Mandrake/RPMS/qt-*
> ls: /mnt/cdrom/Mandrake/RPMS/qt-*: Aucun fichier ou répertoire
Why kde1-compat-1.1.2-8mdk.i586.rpm & qt-1.44-30mdk.i586.rpm & (... ?) in
mandrake/8.0/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/ (mirror server) but not in my cd
]$ ll /mnt/cdrom/Mandrake/RPMS/qt-*
ls: /mnt/cdrom/Mandrake/RPMS/qt-*: Aucun fichier ou répertoire de ce type
]$ ll /mnt/cdrom/Mandrake/RPMS2/qt-*
l
"W.Kasberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am missing kdat. It should be in kdeadmin - but is not - why?
I just notice that kdat have the option Do_NOT_COMPILE in
kdeadmin configure file (Maybe for good reasons, i don't know)
Ok, i can't test it there as i don't have tape.
So i gonna build a n
1 - 100 of 194 matches
Mail list logo
