Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> Yes. There are two separate branches:
>
> 1. cooker. with the same rules as before. uploads allowed. development
>stuff. rulz.
>
> 2. frozen. *not the same rules*. only fixes. stabilization stuff. rulz.
>
> rulz.
>
> Specially dedicated to francois: Fri Sep 8
Steve Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Vincent Danen wrote:
> > Try ftp.sunet.se. Give that one a shot. And we're sorry about all of
> > the problems with the mirrors... rest assured we *are* trying to get
> > this fixed ASAP... not only does this frustrate all of you (and us),
> > but it make
Vincent Danen wrote:
> Try ftp.sunet.se. Give that one a shot. And we're sorry about all of
> the problems with the mirrors... rest assured we *are* trying to get
> this fixed ASAP... not only does this frustrate all of you (and us),
> but it makes the beta cycle less effective if nobody can get
On Wed Sep 06, 2000 at 11:14:40PM -0700, Daniel Tabuenca wrote:
> And now they took off read/execute permissions on the Mandrake-devel
> directory. I don't mean to sound like an asshole and sorry about the
> language, but what gives? I'm not really looking for the ISO, I want a
> working FTP mirr
And now they took off read/execute permissions on the Mandrake-devel
directory. I don't mean to sound like an asshole and sorry about the
language, but what gives? I'm not really looking for the ISO, I want a
working FTP mirror that I can mirror to our FTP servers so that we can
test out network i
Wow! You're really drunk aren't you?
>
>It's been two days and I still can't find a site to download
>Mandrake or do an
>ftp install. All the files in the RPM directory are broken links?
>How hard is
>this to fix and how did it get so broken in the first place?
>
>
>
Ron Stodden wrote:
>
> I am looking forward to a formal authoritative announcement of the
> new structure from MandrakeSoft which will explain how it should be
> used by people who want only cooker, only 7.2beta tree, only 7.2beat
> ISOs, and all of the above.
These guys dont owe you anything. I
Pixel wrote:
> Ron Stodden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I am looking forward to a formal authoritative announcement of the
> > new structure from MandrakeSoft which will explain how it should be
> > used by people who want only cooker, only 7.2beta tree, only 7.2beat
> > ISOs, and all of the
Ron Stodden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am looking forward to a formal authoritative announcement of the
> new structure from MandrakeSoft which will explain how it should be
> used by people who want only cooker, only 7.2beta tree, only 7.2beat
> ISOs, and all of the above.
as for me, your
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
>
> seems that some packages are missing :-(.
The lack of communication among MandrakeSoft operations yet again
amazes me!
For those inside and out that had not yet realised it, the ftp
services of MandrakeSoft are undergoing a very MAJOR reorganisation
which seems i
Geoffrey Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> >
> > It's been two days and I still can't find a site to download Mandrake or do an
> > ftp install. All the files in the RPM directory are broken links? How hard is
> > this to fix and how did it get so broken in the first place?
> >
> >
>
> Y
>
>
>
> It's been two days and I still can't find a site to download Mandrake or do an
> ftp install. All the files in the RPM directory are broken links? How hard is
> this to fix and how did it get so broken in the first place?
>
>
You mean 7.2? I have seen it available for download on ftp.free
It's been two days and I still can't find a site to download Mandrake or do an
ftp install. All the files in the RPM directory are broken links? How hard is
this to fix and how did it get so broken in the first place?
13 matches
Mail list logo