On Tuesday 15 July 2003 22:00, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 01:22:01PM -0400, Gary Lawrence Murphy wrote:
> > IBM reports that they find two orders of magnitude more bugs in an OS
> > release within 30 days of a public release than in the /entire/
> > development QA period. That obse
> B> It may work just after a stable release, but if it doesn't
> B> work, please don't waste the maintainers time filing a bug
> B> report, until you have either rebuilt the source package, or
> B> tried full cooker.
>
> You you don't want anyone but experienced developers debuggin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andi Payn wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 July 2003 12:02, Gary Lawrence Murphy wrote:
>
>>I suppose -- people /still/ use Windows? Amazing ;)
>
>
> I'm sure Buchan will explain why samba is going to be necessary for
Windows to
> finally die--
# net rpc vampi
On Tuesday 15 July 2003 12:02, Gary Lawrence Murphy wrote:
> I suppose -- people /still/ use Windows? Amazing ;)
I'm sure Buchan will explain why samba is going to be necessary for Windows to
finally die--but even after that happens, samba may well survive. SMB/CIFS,
when done right, is a good
> "B" == Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
B> Maybe now I can go back to spending my limited time fixing
B> *real* bugs in samba?
I suppose -- people /still/ use Windows? Amazing ;)
--
Gary Lawrence Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: office voice/fax: 01 519 4222723
Business Adva
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 01:22:01PM -0400, Gary Lawrence Murphy wrote:
> IBM reports that they find two orders of magnitude more bugs in an OS
> release within 30 days of a public release than in the /entire/
> development QA period. That observation doesn't really fit your
> snapshot/beta/pre mode
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary Lawrence Murphy wrote:
>>"B" == Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> B> Maybe now I can go back to spending my limited time fixing
> B> *real* bugs in samba?
>
> I suppose -- people /still/ use Windows? Amazing ;)
>
samba3
On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 18:11, Gary Lawrence Murphy wrote:
> > "A" == Adam Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> A> Well, you've reported two essentially invalid bugs, which isn't
> A> helping anyone much :)
>
> You'd be surprised -- I get technical questions solved all the time by
> "B" == Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
B> That's why we have snapshots, betas, and pre-releases.
So you're saying once it's cut, it's perfect? That's a bit much to
believe. Let's just agree to disagree: I want Mandrake's distros to
be maximally consistent and bug-free, and th
> "A" == Adam Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
A> Well, you've reported two essentially invalid bugs, which isn't
A> helping anyone much :)
You'd be surprised -- I get technical questions solved all the time by
finding false positives. Diskspace for archives is cheap, especiall
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary Lawrence Murphy wrote:
> B> Of course it is all valid, but the points you are missing out
> B> are: 1)What relevance is a bug in the previous ditro to the
> B> next one if it's already fixed in cooker?
>
> ah, yes, but, that assumes i
On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 16:25, Gary Lawrence Murphy wrote:
> > "B" == Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> B> Gary Lawrence Murphy wrote:
> >> I'm hoping I missed something, but the apm-tools (apmd) tell me
> >> the 9.1 distro kernel
>
> B> Of course, this is the wrong l
> "B" == Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
B> FYI, my Thinkpad 600X runs either acpi or apm just fine on
B> 2.4.21.0.13mdk (sorry, can't give definitive answers for other
B> kernels, as I have so many installed on it now for other
B> reasons).
Good -- that's what I need
> "B" == Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
B> Gary Lawrence Murphy wrote:
>> I'm hoping I missed something, but the apm-tools (apmd) tell me
>> the 9.1 distro kernel
B> Of course, this is the wrong list for this question ...
Even if we're building cooker with options i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary Lawrence Murphy wrote:
>>"B" == Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> B> Gary Lawrence Murphy wrote:
> >> I'm hoping I missed something, but the apm-tools (apmd) tell me
> >> the 9.1 distro kernel
>
> B> Of course, thi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary Lawrence Murphy wrote:
> I'm hoping I missed something, but the apm-tools (apmd) tell me the
> 9.1 distro kernel
Of course, this is the wrong list for this question ...
- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan
> I'm hoping I missed something, but the apm-tools (apmd) tell me the
> 9.1 distro kernel does not include APM support -- is this correct?
no.
> If so, does it mean I _must_ build a custom kernel for a laptop?
it depends. For a start you may try to boot with acpi=off.
-andrey
I'm hoping I missed something, but the apm-tools (apmd) tell me the
9.1 distro kernel does not include APM support -- is this correct?
If so, does it mean I _must_ build a custom kernel for a laptop?
--
Gary Lawrence Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: office voice/fax: 01 519 4222723
Business Advant
18 matches
Mail list logo
