Re: [Cooker] lspci doesn't know Matrox G550

2002-01-14 Thread Michal Suchanek
XFree on 8.1 contains the necessary patches. Just FrameBuffer should be Agreed, it says it has driver which supports cads up to G550, and theres one guy who installed 8.1 and the X worked. disabled when a G550 is detected, because when switching back from X to FB, the FB is just all

Re: [Cooker] lspci doesn't know Matrox G550

2002-01-13 Thread Alexander Skwar
So sprach »François Pons« am 2002-01-10 um 15:35:46 +0100 : use lspcidrake, we need merging of these tools. Another reason against lspcidrake: It doesn't provide as much information as lspci does. Compare the output of lspci -v with what lspcidrake -v prints. Alexander Skwar -- How to

Re: [Cooker] lspci doesn't know Matrox G550

2002-01-13 Thread Pixel
Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So sprach »François Pons« am 2002-01-10 um 15:35:46 +0100 : use lspcidrake, we need merging of these tools. Another reason against lspcidrake: It doesn't provide as much information as lspci does. Compare the output of lspci -v with what

Re: [Cooker] lspci doesn't know Matrox G550

2002-01-11 Thread pascal
my G550 works well on mdk 8.1 with 3D accel, you need pathces from the matrox site for XFree86. my lspcidrake is : unknown : Intel Corporation|82845 845 (Brookdale) Chipset Host Bridge unknown : Intel Corporation|82845 845 (Brookdale) Chipset AGP Bridge unknown : Intel

Re: [Cooker] lspci doesn't know Matrox G550

2002-01-11 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
pascal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: my G550 works well on mdk 8.1 with 3D accel, you need pathces from the matrox site for XFree86. What do you need by patches? Doesn't vanillaa 8.1 work ok with G550? -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] lspci doesn't know Matrox G550

2002-01-11 Thread Alexander Skwar
So sprach »Guillaume Cottenceau« am 2002-01-11 um 12:38:29 +0100 : What do you need by patches? Doesn't vanillaa 8.1 work ok with G550? XFree on 8.1 contains the necessary patches. Just FrameBuffer should be disabled when a G550 is detected, because when switching back from X to FB, the FB is

Re: [Cooker] lspci doesn't know Matrox G550

2002-01-11 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So sprach »Guillaume Cottenceau« am 2002-01-11 um 12:38:29 +0100 : What do you need by patches? Doesn't vanillaa 8.1 work ok with G550? XFree on 8.1 contains the necessary patches. Just FrameBuffer should be disabled when a G550 is detected,

Re: [Cooker] lspci doesn't know Matrox G550

2002-01-11 Thread Alexander Skwar
So sprach »Guillaume Cottenceau« am 2002-01-11 um 19:35:25 +0100 : According to DrakX source code, FrameBuffer is disabled for all Matrox cards. Is it not the case? Actually, I don't know. Haven't done an install in ages. Alexander Skwar -- How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german)

[Cooker] lspci doesn't know Matrox G550

2002-01-10 Thread Alexander Skwar
Hi! [askwar@teich askwar]$ lspci|grep Matrox 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Matrox Graphics, Inc.: Unknown device 2527 (rev 01) 2527 is a MGA G550 AGP. From /proc/pci: Bus 1, device 0, function 0: VGA compatible controller: Matrox Graphics, Inc. MGA G550 AGP (rev 1). IRQ

Re: [Cooker] lspci doesn't know Matrox G550

2002-01-10 Thread François Pons
Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [askwar@teich askwar]$ lspci|grep Matrox 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Matrox Graphics, Inc.: Unknown device 2527 (rev 01) 2527 is a MGA G550 AGP. From /proc/pci: use lspcidrake, we need merging of these tools. François.

Re: [Cooker] lspci doesn't know Matrox G550

2002-01-10 Thread Dave Seff
Same goes for a TI ieee1394 board. 00:07.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Texas Instruments: Unknown device 8020 Do we not have support for these things yet? We do have kernel modules for them! -Dave On Thursday 10 January 2002 09:15, you wrote: Hi! [askwar@teich askwar]$ lspci|grep Matrox

Re: [Cooker] lspci doesn't know Matrox G550

2002-01-10 Thread François Pons
Dave Seff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Same goes for a TI ieee1394 board. 00:07.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Texas Instruments: Unknown device 8020 Do we not have support for these things yet? We do have kernel modules for them! lspci is not used by install, check lspcidrake for that.

Re: [Cooker] lspci doesn't know Matrox G550

2002-01-10 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Dave Seff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Same goes for a TI ieee1394 board. 00:07.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Texas Instruments: Unknown device 8020 Do we not have support for these things yet? We do have kernel modules for them! But what's your problem guys with this output ? Does lspcidrake

Re: [Cooker] lspci doesn't know Matrox G550

2002-01-10 Thread Alexander Skwar
So sprach »François Pons« am 2002-01-10 um 15:35:46 +0100 : use lspcidrake, we need merging of these tools. Oh, you're right. lspcidrake knows the G550. However, I don't like lspcidrake. It prints fewer information (the rev. number is missing) and I don't like the layout of the output.

Re: [Cooker] lspci doesn't know Matrox G550

2002-01-10 Thread Dave Seff
No, It gives unknown unknown : VIA Technologies|VT8367 [KT266] unknown : VIA Technologies|VT8367 [KT266 AGP] unknown : Texas Instruments|TSB12LV26 OHCI-Lynx PCI IEEE 1394 Host Controller tulip : Lite-On|LC82C115 PNIC-II unknown : VIA Technologies|VT8233

Re: [Cooker] lspci doesn't know Matrox G550

2002-01-10 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Dave Seff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: No, It gives unknown Do you know which Linux kernel driver supports this board and can you send results for lspcidrake -v please? -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] lspci doesn't know Matrox G550

2002-01-10 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] lspci can be found on RedHat, SuSE and Mandrake (debian too?). So it's a kinda universal tool. lspcidrake can only be found on Mandrake. And since it doesn't add much (besides formatting)... lspcidrake's aim is to map a PCI card with its