Re: [Cooker] no more key use for ssh ?

2001-10-05 Thread Vincent Danen
On Fri Oct 05, 2001 at 12:20:30AM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: > So sprach »Vincent Danen« am 2001-10-04 um 14:04:23 -0600 : > > for SSH2 (~/.ssh/id_dsa(.pub) and ~/.ssh/id_rsa(.pub)) and use > > ~/.ssh/authorized_keys2 to store authorized keys for protocol2. > > Isn't authorized_keys2 and know

Re: [Cooker] no more key use for ssh ?

2001-10-05 Thread Ben Reser
On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 07:32:59AM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: > Am Fre, 2001-10-05 um 06.21 schrieb 1002255697: > > ~/.ssh/config doesn't work something in ssh is borked. > > Hm? It does work. I've set some aliases for hosts in my ~/.ssh/config, > and they still work. Let me revise that. Th

Re: [Cooker] no more key use for ssh ?

2001-10-04 Thread Alexander Skwar
Am Fre, 2001-10-05 um 06.21 schrieb 1002255697: > ~/.ssh/config doesn't work something in ssh is borked. Hm? It does work. I've set some aliases for hosts in my ~/.ssh/config, and they still work. -- Alexander Skwar -- How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english

Re: [Cooker] no more key use for ssh ?

2001-10-04 Thread Alexander Skwar
Am Fre, 2001-10-05 um 04.43 schrieb 1002249836: > Not yet, not yet,next version. But you can allready throw all keys in > the same file. Make sure you don't have two ( ssh1 & ssh2 ) keys from > the same host. Yes, that's right. But if they only read the file for backwards compatibility, it's a s

Re: [Cooker] no more key use for ssh ?

2001-10-04 Thread Ben Reser
On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 10:12:55PM +0200, Xavier Bertou wrote: > > > Yes, if users are aware of changes :-) > > Check the changelog: > > (vdanen@logan: ~)$ rpm -q openssh --changelog > [...] > And use ssh -v to understand what's wrong. > To go back to protocol 1, in ~/.ssh/config: > Host * (or wha

Re: [Cooker] no more key use for ssh ?

2001-10-04 Thread Han
Alexander Skwar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > So sprach »Vincent Danen« am 2001-10-04 um 14:04:23 -0600 : >> for SSH2 (~/.ssh/id_dsa(.pub) and ~/.ssh/id_rsa(.pub)) and use >> ~/.ssh/authorized_keys2 to store authorized keys for protocol2. > Isn't authorized_keys2 and known_hosts2 deprecated? Acco

Re: [Cooker] no more key use for ssh ?

2001-10-04 Thread Alexander Skwar
So sprach »Vincent Danen« am 2001-10-04 um 14:04:23 -0600 : > for SSH2 (~/.ssh/id_dsa(.pub) and ~/.ssh/id_rsa(.pub)) and use > ~/.ssh/authorized_keys2 to store authorized keys for protocol2. Isn't authorized_keys2 and known_hosts2 deprecated? According to http://www.deadly.org/article.php3?sid=2

Re: [Cooker] no more key use for ssh ?

2001-10-04 Thread Xavier Bertou
> > Yes, if users are aware of changes :-) > Check the changelog: > (vdanen@logan: ~)$ rpm -q openssh --changelog [...] And use ssh -v to understand what's wrong. To go back to protocol 1, in ~/.ssh/config: Host * (or whatever you need) Protocol 1,2

Re: [Cooker] no more key use for ssh ?

2001-10-04 Thread Vincent Danen
On Thu Oct 04, 2001 at 06:19:07PM +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote: > [guillaume@silbermann guillaume]$ diff -Naur .ssh/authorized_keys > .ssh/identity.pub > > [guillaume@silbermann guillaume]$ ssh localhost > guillaume@localhost's password: > Why doesn't ssh use keys login anymore ? I didn't chan

Re: [Cooker] no more key use for ssh ?

2001-10-04 Thread Oden Eriksson
torsdagen den 4 oktober 2001 19.33 skrev Guillaume Rousse: > Ainsi parlait Oden Eriksson : > > This new package defaults to using v2 (rsa, dsa 2048 bits) which is a > > good thing. > > Yes, if users are aware of changes :-) Yes, they, we all should at least try to :) -- Oden Eriksson, Jokkmokk

Re: [Cooker] no more key use for ssh ?

2001-10-04 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Ainsi parlait Oden Eriksson : > This new package defaults to using v2 (rsa, dsa 2048 bits) which is a good > thing. Yes, if users are aware of changes :-) -- Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG key http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html

Re: [Cooker] no more key use for ssh ?

2001-10-04 Thread Oden Eriksson
torsdagen den 4 oktober 2001 18.35 skrev Guillaume Rousse: > Ainsi parlait Chmouel Boudjnah : > > Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > [guillaume@silbermann guillaume]$ diff -Naur .ssh/authorized_keys > > > .ssh/identity.pub > > > > > > [guillaume@silbermann guillaume]$ ssh localhost

Re: [Cooker] no more key use for ssh ?

2001-10-04 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Ainsi parlait Han : > Guillaume Rousse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > [guillaume@silbermann guillaume]$ diff -Naur .ssh/authorized_keys > > .ssh/identity.pub > > > > [guillaume@silbermann guillaume]$ ssh localhost > > guillaume@localhost's password: > > Why doesn't ssh use keys login anymore ? I d

Re: [Cooker] no more key use for ssh ?

2001-10-04 Thread Han
Guillaume Rousse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > [guillaume@silbermann guillaume]$ diff -Naur .ssh/authorized_keys > .ssh/identity.pub > [guillaume@silbermann guillaume]$ ssh localhost > guillaume@localhost's password: > Why doesn't ssh use keys login anymore ? I didn't change anything in my > co

Re: [Cooker] no more key use for ssh ?

2001-10-04 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Ainsi parlait Guillaume Cottenceau : > Or, to revert, you may edit /etc/ssh/ssh_config and invert the Protocol > parameter. As a side question, how did a new config file replace the ancient one ? I thought rpm was designed to avoid this ? -- Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG key http://li

Re: [Cooker] no more key use for ssh ?

2001-10-04 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Ainsi parlait Chmouel Boudjnah : > Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [guillaume@silbermann guillaume]$ diff -Naur .ssh/authorized_keys > > .ssh/identity.pub > > > > [guillaume@silbermann guillaume]$ ssh localhost > > guillaume@localhost's password: > > Why doesn't ssh use keys login

[Cooker] no more key use for ssh ?

2001-10-04 Thread Guillaume Rousse
[guillaume@silbermann guillaume]$ diff -Naur .ssh/authorized_keys .ssh/identity.pub [guillaume@silbermann guillaume]$ ssh localhost guillaume@localhost's password: Why doesn't ssh use keys login anymore ? I didn't change anything in my configuration ?? -- Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> G