-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Eastcott
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 11:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Cooker] ntp-4.1.1a-1mdk
On Thursday 15 August 2002 09:31
On 15. aug 2002 00:59, Oden Eriksson wrote:
I have updated the ntp package, either use attached patch, get the package at
http://d-srv.com/Cooker/, or ignore the whole thing...
it is possible to split this package into two(?) parts? ntp-server,
ntp-clients..
many machines is synced via ntp
On torsdagen den 15 augusti 2002 05.09 Tibor Pittich wrote:
On 15. aug 2002 00:59, Oden Eriksson wrote:
I have updated the ntp package, either use attached patch, get the
package at http://d-srv.com/Cooker/, or ignore the whole thing...
it is possible to split this package into two(?)
--- Oden Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On torsdagen den 15 augusti 2002 05.09 Tibor Pittich
wrote:
On 15. aug 2002 00:59, Oden Eriksson wrote:
I have updated the ntp package, either use
attached patch, get the
package at http://d-srv.com/Cooker/, or ignore
the whole thing...
On Thursday 15 August 2002 11:27 am, you wrote:
On torsdagen den 15 augusti 2002 05.09 Tibor Pittich wrote:
On 15. aug 2002 00:59, Oden Eriksson wrote:
I have updated the ntp package, either use attached patch, get the
package at http://d-srv.com/Cooker/, or ignore the whole thing...
On 15. aug 2002 06:41, David Eastcott wrote:
I'll try to fix it and hope it will be accepted.
Be kinda interesting to know how you propose to split package?
if i can propose, my idea is:
ntp-server - which might be contain: ntpd binar, ntp.conf, ntp.keys,
and
--- Tibor Pittich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 15. aug 2002 06:41, David Eastcott wrote:
I'll try to fix it and hope it will be accepted.
Be kinda interesting to know how you propose to
split package?
if i can propose, my idea is:
ntp-server - which might be contain: ntpd binar,
Da 15. aug 2002 o 07:22, David Walser napsal(a):
ntp-clients - which also might be contain: ntpq,
ntpdate
ntpd is a client too, what you're proposing doesn't
actually make any sense.
i think, if program is running as daemon (ntpd) and provide any service
then it is server. client is,
On torsdagen den 15 augusti 2002 10.22 David Walser wrote:
--- Tibor Pittich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 15. aug 2002 06:41, David Eastcott wrote:
I'll try to fix it and hope it will be accepted.
Be kinda interesting to know how you propose to
split package?
if i can propose,
On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 15:01, Tibor Pittich wrote:
On 15. aug 2002 06:41, David Eastcott wrote:
I'll try to fix it and hope it will be accepted.
Be kinda interesting to know how you propose to split package?
if i can propose, my idea is:
ntp-server - which might be contain: ntpd
--- Tibor Pittich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i think, if program is running as daemon (ntpd) and
provide any service
then it is server. client is, imho, only standalone
application, which
can _only_ using this service, but not provide
further.
p.s.: you call named as client too?;)
You're
--- Adam Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IIRC, the ntp page says ntpdate is deprecated, since
its functionality
can now be duplicated with ntp (or ntpd, I
forget)...
Not sure what you're referring to, but rdate does the
job, so ntpdate still isn't needed :o)
--- Oden Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually it does since the current setup provides
both client and server
meaning a possible security issue on port 123.
Unless you changed something in your 4.1.1a, the
current setup doesn't allow you to use ntpd as a
server, you have to run
On Thursday 15 August 2002 02:40 pm, you wrote:
--- Adam Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IIRC, the ntp page says ntpdate is deprecated, since
its functionality
can now be duplicated with ntp (or ntpd, I
forget)...
Not sure what you're referring to, but rdate does the
job, so
On Thursday 15 August 2002 09:31 am, you wrote:
[...]
IIRC, the ntp page says ntpdate is deprecated, since its functionality
can now be duplicated with ntp (or ntpd, I forget)...
Yes you can (ntpd), but if the local clock is too far out, it will never
lock-in and properly adjust the system
On Thursday 15 August 2002 08:01 am, you wrote:
On 15. aug 2002 06:41, David Eastcott wrote:
I'll try to fix it and hope it will be accepted.
Be kinda interesting to know how you propose to split package?
if i can propose, my idea is:
ntp-server - which might be contain: ntpd binar,
On Thursday 15 August 2002 16:41, David Walser wrote:
--- Oden Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually it does since the current setup provides
both client and server
meaning a possible security issue on port 123.
Unless you changed something in your 4.1.1a, the
current setup doesn't
On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 08:41, David Eastcott wrote:
On Thursday 15 August 2002 11:27 am, you wrote:
On torsdagen den 15 augusti 2002 05.09 Tibor Pittich wrote:
On 15. aug 2002 00:59, Oden Eriksson wrote:
I have updated the ntp package, either use attached patch, get the
package at
On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 10:01, Tibor Pittich wrote:
On 15. aug 2002 06:41, David Eastcott wrote:
I'll try to fix it and hope it will be accepted.
Be kinda interesting to know how you propose to split package?
if i can propose, my idea is:
ntp-server - which might be contain: ntpd
Hi.
I have updated the ntp package, either use attached patch, get the package at
http://d-srv.com/Cooker/, or ignore the whole thing...
This:
http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~ntp/ntp_spool/ntp4/ntp-4.1.1a.tar.gz
Plus attached patch = ntp-4.1.1a-1mdk
Or:
http://d-srv.com/Cooker/
Chears.
--
20 matches
Mail list logo
