Kaixo!
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 06:37:38PM +0200, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
> > 3. The fonts in all the GTK2 stuff look terrible. Very choppy on
> > my 1024x768 LCD, which is a very common thing on laptops. The
the gnome font configurator (gnome-font-properties) has fine-tuning options,
some of t
Buchan Milne wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Sep 2003, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > Erm...is 1024x768 actually your laptop's native resolution? Reason I ask
> > is I see no problem at all with the 1024x768 images on my CRT. Unless
> > you mean the white lines which become more prominent in a spherical
> > patte
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> I'm not sure Pixel will want to spend the necessary time to make
> this real. Changing steps in the installer has always been buggy.
> It's complicated and not really designed for it. Removing it
> completely allowed us to do things like deleting image files for
> lang
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Austin wrote:
>
> On 09/05/2003 09:14:32 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > okay - see my reply to your other post, i think between that and the
> > other replies in this thread I think we have it all sorted out, yeah? :)
>
> Yeah I understand the problem... I think I always did.
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Erm...is 1024x768 actually your laptop's native resolution? Reason I ask
> is I see no problem at all with the 1024x768 images on my CRT. Unless
> you mean the white lines which become more prominent in a spherical
> pattern in the top and slightly to t
On 09/05/2003 09:14:32 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
okay - see my reply to your other post, i think between that and the
other replies in this thread I think we have it all sorted out, yeah? :)
Yeah I understand the problem... I think I always did. I was just bringing it
up to see if it has to be
On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 02:13, Austin wrote:
> On 09/05/2003 08:06:46 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Erm...is 1024x768 actually your laptop's native resolution?
>
> Yes.
>
> > Reason I ask
> > is I see no problem at all with the 1024x768 images on my CRT.
>
> Neither do I.
okay - see my reply to
On 09/05/2003 08:06:46 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Erm...is 1024x768 actually your laptop's native resolution?
Yes.
Reason I ask
is I see no problem at all with the 1024x768 images on my CRT.
Neither do I.
Austin
--
Austin Acton Hon.B.Sc.
Synthetic Organic Chemis
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 01:02, Austin wrote:
> I just installed rc1 on my laptop (finally, been VERY busy lately).
>
> A few notes:
>
> 1. There are still not many 'BACK' button in drakx. This is very
> frustrating for a user when he screws up.
>
> 2. Draksound chose trident() as my soundcard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Austin wrote:
> On 09/05/2003 01:33:44 PM, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
>
>> Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > > > 3. The fonts in all the GTK2 stuff look terrible. Very choppy
>> on
>> > > > my 1024x768 LCD, which is a very common thing on laptop
"John Keller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thierry Vignaud wrote:
> > Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > I just installed rc1 on my laptop (finally, been VERY busy lately).
> > >
> > > A few notes:
> > >
> > > 1. There are still not many 'BACK' button in drakx. This is very
> > > f
On 09/05/2003 01:33:44 PM, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > 3. The fonts in all the GTK2 stuff look terrible. Very choppy
on
> > > my 1024x768 LCD, which is a very common thing on laptops. The
> > > 'real' text mode fonts look fine though.
> >
> > maybe can you up
Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > 3. The fonts in all the GTK2 stuff look terrible. Very choppy on
> > > my 1024x768 LCD, which is a very common thing on laptops. The
> > > 'real' text mode fonts look fine though.
> >
> > maybe can you upload a few screenshots on some site and post thei
On 09/05/2003 12:13:46 PM, John Keller wrote:
Did you run the vgahi install? I did, and the graphical install
looked
good
on my 1024x768 (native) LCD.
Well, no. I was just testing the installer like Joe User.
Personally I don't care how drakx looks. As long as I can get
basesystem installed,
On 09/05/2003 12:37:59 PM, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
anyway, since alan cox won't maintain much OSS drivers in the short
term, sound card default drivers may be progressively switched from
OSS to ALSA.
Sure, that's cool.
> 3. The fonts in all the GTK2 stuff look terrible. Very choppy on
> my 1024x7
Thierry Vignaud wrote:
> Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I just installed rc1 on my laptop (finally, been VERY busy lately).
> >
> > A few notes:
> >
> > 1. There are still not many 'BACK' button in drakx. This is very
> > frustrating for a user when he screws up.
>
> postponed to md
Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just installed rc1 on my laptop (finally, been VERY busy lately).
>
> A few notes:
>
> 1. There are still not many 'BACK' button in drakx. This is very
> frustrating for a user when he screws up.
postponed to mdk10
> 2. Draksound chose trident() as my
Austin wrote:
> 3. The fonts in all the GTK2 stuff look terrible. Very choppy on my
> 1024x768 LCD, which is a very common thing on laptops. The 'real' text
> mode fonts look fine though.
Did you run the vgahi install? I did, and the graphical install looked good
on my 1024x768 (native) LCD.
-
I just installed rc1 on my laptop (finally, been VERY busy lately).
A few notes:
1. There are still not many 'BACK' button in drakx. This is very
frustrating for a user when he screws up.
2. Draksound chose trident() as my soundcard driver, which is OSS. I
thought alsa was the default.
19 matches
Mail list logo
