Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake (good job)

2002-08-29 Thread Chuck Shirley
On Thursday 29 August 2002 10:18, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: >d'you know that "knight rider" was called K-2000 here in France? >i remember i enjoyed very much this program, the car was so >strong :-). i heard that they stopped shooting it because it cost >too much money.. Hmm changing the name s

Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake (good job)

2002-08-29 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > Just a suggestion: error message > "Désolé, les paquetages suivants ne peuvent pas être sélectionnés" should be a > little bit more explicit: why ? Well I've just talked about that with Francois, the urpmi API doesn't provide the reason so

Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake (good job)

2002-08-29 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Chuck Shirley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > See, Guillaume, I told you folks would come around to appreciating > the new rpmdrake! BTW, Jason meant, in his second paragraph, that > the side-to-side oscillating "Please Wait" window from Old rpmdrake > used too much network bandwidth when

Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake (good job)

2002-08-29 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Le Jeudi 29 Août 2002 12:34, Chuck Shirley a écrit : > >> I'm glad there aren't any high activity widgets when installing packages > >> on gurpmi, the one that went back and forth like knigh rider before > >> could swamp a pair of T1's running from remote :-/ > > > >Not sure my english is enough t

Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake (good job)

2002-08-29 Thread Chuck Shirley
On Thursday 29 August 2002 05:47, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: >Jason Straight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I was scared at first when I saw the new face of rpmdrake, but it's shaped up >> well, just wanted to say, "Good job!" > >Thanks. > >> I'm glad there aren't any high activity widgets wh

Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake (good job)

2002-08-29 Thread François Pons
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Le Jeudi 29 Août 2002 11:47, Guillaume Cottenceau a écrit : > > Jason Straight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I was scared at first when I saw the new face of rpmdrake, but it's > > > shaped up well, just wanted to say, "Good job!" > > > > Thanks.

Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake (good job)

2002-08-29 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Jason Straight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I was scared at first when I saw the new face of rpmdrake, but it's shaped up > well, just wanted to say, "Good job!" Thanks. > I'm glad there aren't any high activity widgets when installing packages on > gurpmi, the one that went back and forth

Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake (good job)

2002-08-29 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Le Jeudi 29 Août 2002 11:47, Guillaume Cottenceau a écrit : > Jason Straight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I was scared at first when I saw the new face of rpmdrake, but it's > > shaped up well, just wanted to say, "Good job!" > > Thanks. Same for me, even if i barely use it :-) Just a suggesti

Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake (good job)

2002-08-28 Thread Liam R. E. Quin
On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 13:07, Jason Straight wrote: > I'm glad there aren't any high activity widgets when installing packages on > gurpmi, the one that went back and forth like knigh rider before could swamp > a pair of T1's running from remote :-/ Seconded that rpmdrake is really coming along

[Cooker] rpmdrake (good job)

2002-08-28 Thread Jason Straight
I was scared at first when I saw the new face of rpmdrake, but it's shaped up well, just wanted to say, "Good job!" I'm glad there aren't any high activity widgets when installing packages on gurpmi, the one that went back and forth like knigh rider before could swamp a pair of T1's running fr